Cited by 14Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesBusiness Strategies and InnovationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Developing machine learning products better and faster at startups

Shams, Rushdi·2018·IEEE Engineering Management Review

Abstract

There are many uncertainties in developing machine-learning (ML)-based products. Due to the gap between research and development, the overall progress becomes slow, and experiences many failures and learnings only to see an initial idea not working or generating no significant revenue. To minimize these drastic effects, there are continuing studies to make a balanced handshake between research and development to shorten the time span of ML-based products from idea generation to deployment. This paper demonstrates a three-phase ML product development workflow at OneClass. The workflow is a combination of multiple best-practices in the innovation-based startup industry. The first phase of the workflow considers the pivotal idea generation for products that involves data reliability assessment, idea prioritization, expectation setting, and building trust among users. The second phase concentrates on several state-of-the-art strategies for planning and future re-use of several product components. Finally, the actual research and development phase describes the fail-fast method practiced by OneClass to learn quickly from failures and act accordingly. The workflow is followed by the company to develop many sophisticated ML-based products successfully within a very short period of time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/emr.2018.2870669

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Shams, R.
Corresponding author
Shams, Rushdi
Venue
IEEE Engineering Management Review
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
36-39
ISSN
  • 0360-8581 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-4178
OpenAlex
W2896627448
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Engineering Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
startups, idea generation, data reliability assessment, idea prioritization, user trust, innovation management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review