The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Timing analysis of reliable real-time communication in CAN networks
Abstract
The Controller Area Network (CAN) is a fieldbus network with real-time capabilities. It is generally considered that CAN guarantees atomic multicast properties, through its extensive error detection/signalling mechanisms. However, there are error situations where messages can be delivered in duplicate by some receivers or delivered only by a subset of the receivers, leading to inconsistencies in the supported applications. In order to prevent such inconsistencies, a set of atomic multicast protocols is proposed, taking advantage of CAN synchronous properties to minimise its run-time overhead. This paper presents such set of protocols, focusing on the timing analysis of the supported reliable real-time communication. It demonstrates that, in spite of the extra stack of protocols, the real-time capabilities of CAN are preserved, since the predictability of message transfer is guaranteed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this paper is presented an analytical assessment tool that is based on legacy response time analysis research works [3-6] previously proposed for the analysis of CAN (Controller Area Network) communication.”
From Real-Time Analysis of Time-Critical Messages in IEC 61850 Electrical Substation Communication Systems (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The response time analysis for a non-preemptive fixed-priority system, as proposed in [3-5], can be adapted to estimate the maximum response time of message exchanges in an IEC 61850 process bus communication system Equation (1).”
From Real-Time Analysis of Time-Critical Messages in IEC 61850 Electrical Substation Communication Systems (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
Fault-tolerant broadcasts and related problems
Hadzilacos, V., & Toueg, S. (1993) · ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. eBooks · Cited by 478
Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times
Tindell, K., Burns, A., & Wellings, A. J. (1994) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)45747-8 · Cited by 439
Calculating controller area network (can) message response times
Tindell, K., Burns, A., & Wellings, A. J. (1995) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(95)00112-8 · Cited by 435
ATOMIC BROADCAST: FROM SIMPLE MESSAGE DIFFUSION TO BYZANTINE AGREEMENT
Cristian, F., Aghili, H., Strong, R., & Volev, D. (2005) · IEEE International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing · doi:10.1109/ftcsh.1995.532668 · Cited by 355
Fault-tolerant broadcasts in CAN
Rufino, J., Veríssimo, P., Arroz, G., Almeida, C., & Rodrigues, L. (2002) · IEEE International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing · doi:10.1109/ftcs.1998.689464 · Cited by 117
Replica determinism and flexible scheduling in hard real-time dependable systems
Poledna, S., Burns, A., Wellings, A. J., & Barrett, P. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/12.833107 · Cited by 75
Integrating inaccessibility in response time analysis of CAN networks
Pinho, L. M., Vasques, F., & Tovar, E. (2002) · IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS) · doi:10.1109/wfcs.2000.882537 · Cited by 34
Self-citationAchieving Fault-Tolerant Ordered Broadcasts in CAN
Kaiser, J., & Livani, M. A. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48254-7_24 · Cited by 22
Distributed Computer-Controlled Systems: The Dear-COTS Approach 1
Veríssimo, P., Casimiro, A., Rodrigues, L., Pinho, L. M., Tovar, E., & Vasques, F. (2000) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)36739-3 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- rufino, 1995, A Study on the Inaccessibility Characteristics of the Controller Area Network, Proc of the 2nd International CAN Conference London United Kingdom October 1995
- 1993, Road Vehicle - Interchange of Digital Information - Controller Area Network (CAN) for High-Speed Communication
Cited by
León, H., Montez, C., Valle, O., & Vasques, F. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12122272 · Cited by 35
Self-citationFlexibility in Dependable Real-Time Communication
Broster, I. (2004) · Cited by 23
Replication Management in Reliable Real-Time Systems
Pinho, L. M., Vasques, F., & Wellings, A. J. (2004) · Real-Time Systems · doi:10.1023/b:time.0000018248.18519.46 · Cited by 20
Self-citationWeakly hard real-time constraints on controller area network
Broster, I., Bernat, G., & Burns, A. (2003) · Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS) · doi:10.1109/emrts.2002.1019193 · Cited by 18
Timing Analysis of hybrid FlexRay, CAN-FD and CAN vehicular networks
Lange, R., Bonatto, A. C., Vasques, F., & de Oliveira, R. S. (2016) · Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) · doi:10.1109/iecon.2016.7793791 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinho, L. M., & Vasques, F.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Técnica do Porto (PT)
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Venue
- Proceedings 13th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Pages
- 103-114
- ISSN
- 1068-3070 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136614457
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Real-Time Systems Scheduling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Keywords
- CAN bus, atomic multicast, timing analysis, error detection, fieldbus networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
