Cited by 95Smart Grid Energy ManagementBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

A novel demand side management program using water heaters and particle swarm optimization

Sepulveda, Arnaldo, Paull, Liam, Morsi, Walid G., Li, Howard, Diduch, C. P., Chang, Liuchen·2010·2010 IEEE Electrical Power & Energy Conference

Abstract

Power systems' operators have the task of maintaining the balance between the demand and generation of electric power. Much research and attention is being given to find more environmental friendly sources of power generation. Naturally, more power is required when the load is at its peak value, and this tends to be when the most non environmentally friendly sources of power generation are used. This paper proposes a new controller for peak load shaving by intelligently scheduling power consumption of domestic electric water heater using binary particle swarm optimization. Past studies show that similar demand side management programs were not successful because the impact that the load control has on the end users' comfort. In this study, Binary Particle Swarm Optimization (BPSO) finds the optimal load demand schedule for minimizing the peak load demand while maximizing customer comfort level. A simulation in Matlab is used to test the performance of the demand response program using field data gathered by smart meters from 200 households. The direct load control is shown to be an effective tool for peak shaving of load demand, shifting the loads to valleys and reducing the aggregated load of electricity without compromising customer satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/epec.2010.5697187

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cited works on demand scheduling neglect grid constraints, and therefore there is no strict control of congestion events and voltage issues along the feeders.

    “All these works neglect grid constraints, and therefore there is no strict control of congestion events and voltage issues along the feeders.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 95

Authors
Sepulveda, A., Paull, L., Morsi, W. G., Li, H., Diduch, C. P., & Chang, L.
Affiliations
University of New Brunswick (CA)
Venue
2010 IEEE Electrical Power & Energy Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-08
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W2129589829
Cited by
95
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
demand-side management, demand response, electric water heaters, peak shaving, binary particle swarm optimization, direct load control, load scheduling, customer comfort, smart meters, household electricity consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review