Cited by 41Simulation Techniques and ApplicationsMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationDigital Transformation in Industry

LLM experiments with simulation: Large Language Model Multi-Agent System for Simulation Model Parametrization in Digital Twins

Open access
Xia, Yuchen, Dittler, Daniel, Jazdi, Nasser, Chen, Haonan, Weyrich, Michael·2024·2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel design of a multi-agent system framework that applies large language models (LLMs) to automate the parametrization of simulation models in digital twins. This framework features specialized LLM agents tasked with observing, reasoning, decision-making, and summarizing, enabling them to dynamically interact with digital twin simulations to explore parametrization possibilities and determine feasible parameter settings to achieve an obj ective. The proposed approach enhances the usability of simulation model by infusing it with knowledge heuristics from LLM and enables autonomous search for feasible parametrization to solve a user task. Furthermore, the system has the potential to increase user-friendliness and reduce the cognitive load on human users by assisting in complex decision-making processes. The effectiveness and functionality of the system are demonstrated through a case study, and the visualized demos and codes are available at a GitHub Repository: https://github.comlYuchenXia/LLMDrivenSimulation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/etfa61755.2024.10710900

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interplay of digital twins and cyber deception suggests an emerging architecture in which a digital twin of the production IoT environment serves both as a high-fidelity decoy and as a simulation testbed for response playbooks.

    “The interplay of digital twins and cyber deception [128] suggests an emerging architecture in which a digital twin of the production IoT environment serves both as a high-fidelity decoy and as a simulation testbed for response playbooks [138,139].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, Y., Dittler, D., Jazdi, N., Chen, H., & Weyrich, M.
Affiliations
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Venue
2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-09-10
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W4403447187
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 3
FWCI
28.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
large language models, multi-agent systems, digital twin, parameter optimization, LLM agents, autonomous decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review