CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59Battery Modeling and ManagementAdvancements in Battery MaterialsExtraction and Separation Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrical safety of commercial Li-ion cells based on NMC and NCA technology compared to LFP technology

Brand, Martin, Glaser, Simon, Geder, Jan, Menacher, Stefan, Obpacher, Sebastian, Jossen, Andreas, Quinger, Daniel·2013·2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27)
DOI 10.1109/evs.2013.6914893
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since a laptop caught fire in 2006 at the latest, Li-ion cells were considered as more dangerous than other accumulators [1]. Recent incidents, such as the one involving a BYD e6 electric taxi [2] or the Boeing Dreamliner [3], give rise to questions concerning the safety of L#i-ion cells. This is a crucial point, since Li-ion cells are increasingly integrated in all kinds of (electric) vehicles. Therefore the economic success of hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) and battery electric vehicles (BEV) depends significantly on the safety of Li-ion cells. Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) and lithium nickel cobalt aluminium oxide (NCA) are two standard Li-ion cathode chemistries, which are often used for today's HEVs and BEVs Li-ion batteries. Cells with this two cathode technologies are investigated in detail and compared to cells with the alleged save lithium iron phosphate (LFP) technology. Furthermore only commercially available and mass produced Li-ion cells were tested, in order to get as close to real end-user applications as possible. To ensure comparability, cells with the most common 18650 casing have been used. Furthermore all cells had no built-in resistor with positive temperature coefficient (PTC-device). For each abuse test at least 2 cells have been tested to get to know the statistical dispersion. The spread was in all tests for all measured values of each cell type lower than 11 %. Consequently it can be supposed, that mass produced cells show equal behaviour also in abusive test. The performed electrical safety tests on these cells, involve overcharge, overdischarge and short circuit tests. These tests represent real abuse scenarios and are geared to established standards [15], [16], [17], [18]. To complete these measurements an accelerated rate calorimetry (ARC) test has been carried out, to determine the thermal stability of the cells. As in the literature discussed, the investigated LFP/C cells show a higher thermal stability and are therefore safer, although they do not have any overcharge buffer as the investigated NCA/C and NMC/C cells.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/evs.2013.6914893

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No operation of the battery pack after a deep discharge should be allowed by the BMS because of the possibility of short circuits due to corrosion phenomena.

    “In addition, no operation of the battery pack after a deep discharge should be allowed by the BMS because of the possibility of short circuits due to corrosion phenomena [70].”

    From Battery Management System Hardware Concepts: An Overview (2018) · cites this paper as [70]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. wenzel, 1999, Self-discharge, Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources, 1
  2. burrus, 2005, Current Interrupt Device for Rechargeable Cells
  3. ahlers, 0, What's wrong with the dreamliner, CNN
  4. bradher, 0, BYD Releases Details about Electric Taxi Fire
  5. derbyshire, 0, Exploding Laptops Prompt Dell Battery Recall
  6. roscher, 2010, Zustandserkennung von lifepo4-batterien f�r hybrid-und elektrofahrzeuge, Dissertation RWTH Aachen

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Brand, M., Glaser, S., Geder, J., Menacher, S., Obpacher, S., Jossen, A., & Quinger, D.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • TUM CREATE (SG)
  • TÜV SÜD (Germany) (DE)
ORCID
Venue
2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-11
Pages
1-9
DOI
10.1109/evs.2013.6914893
OpenAlex
W2078570225
Cited by
59
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
lithium-ion battery safety, NCM cathode, NCA cathode, lithium iron phosphate, abuse testing, overcharging, overdischarge, short circuit, accelerated rate calorimetry, thermal stability, 18650 cells, electric vehicles, battery thermal runaway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review