Cited by 93Emotion and Mood RecognitionImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

The more the merrier: Analysing the affect of a group of people in images

Dhall, Abhinav, Joshi, Jyoti, Sikka, Karan, Goecke, Roland, Sebe, Nicu·2015·2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)

Abstract

The recent advancement of social media has given users a platform to socially engage and interact with a global population. With millions of images being uploaded onto social media platforms, there is an increasing interest in inferring the emotion and mood display of a group of people in images. Automatic affect analysis research has come a long way but has traditionally focussed on a single subject in a scene. In this paper, we study the problem of inferring the emotion of a group of people in an image. This group affect has wide applications in retrieval, advertisement, content recommendation and security. The contributions of the paper are: 1) a novel emotion labelled database of groups of people in images; 2) a Multiple Kernel Learning based hybrid affect inference model; 3) a scene context based affect inference model; 4) a user survey to better understand the attributes that affect the perception of affect of a group of people in an image. The detailed experimentation validation provides a rich baseline for the proposed database.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fg.2015.7163151

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most approaches target primitive facial expressions of affect, but others recognize cognitive states, positive and negative affect from groups of people, and liking/not-liking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes.

    “Most approaches target primitive FEs of affect, but others recognize cognitive states [266], postive and negative affect from groups of people [267] and liking/not-linking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes [268].”
  • Methods for recognizing other affective states have been proposed, namely cognitive states like boredom, confusion, delight, concentration and frustration, positive and negative affect from groups of people, or liking/not-liking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes.

    “Methods for recognizing other affective states have also been proposed, namely cognitive states like boredom, confusion, delight, concentration and frustration [266], positive and negative affect from groups of people [267] or liking/not-linking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes [268].”
  • In naturalistic environments, most approaches target primitive facial expressions of affect, but methods for recognizing cognitive states, positive and negative affect from groups of people, or liking/not-liking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes are also common.

    “In naturalistic environments, most approaches target primitive FEs of affect. Methods for recognizing cognitive states [266], positive and negative affect from groups of people [267] or liking/not-linking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes [268] are also common.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhall, A., Joshi, J., Sikka, K., Goecke, R., & Sebe, N.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Trento (IT)
Venue
2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-05
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1603712378
Cited by
93
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
19.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
emotion inference, social media images, multiple kernel learning, scene context, user survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review