Cited by 1,861Face recognition and analysisEmotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression Recognition

Openface 2.0: facial behavior analysis toolkit

Baltrusaitis, Tadas, Zadeh, Amir, Lim, Yao Chong, Morency, Louis-Philippe·2018·2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018)

Abstract

Over the past few years, there has been an increased interest in automatic facial behavior analysis and understanding. We present OpenFace 2.0 - a tool intended for computer vision and machine learning researchers, affective computing community and people interested in building interactive applications based on facial behavior analysis. OpenFace 2.0 is an extension of OpenFace toolkit and is capable of more accurate facial landmark detection, head pose estimation, facial action unit recognition, and eye-gaze estimation. The computer vision algorithms which represent the core of OpenFace 2.0 demonstrate state-of-the-art results in all of the above mentioned tasks. Furthermore, our tool is capable of real-time performance and is able to run from a simple webcam without any specialist hardware. Finally, unlike a lot of modern approaches or toolkits, OpenFace 2.0 source code for training models and running them is freely available for research purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fg.2018.00019

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OpenFace 2.0 works well to find faces even when there are changes in face orientation, intensity fluctuations, and the position of the capturing device.

    “The primary justification for using OpenFace 2.0 for face identification is that this method works well to find faces even when there are changes in face orientation, intensity fluctuations, and the position of the capturing device.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baltrusaitis, T., Zadeh, A., Lim, Y. C., & Morency, L.-P.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-05
Pages
59-66
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807126412
Cited by
1,861
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 171 · 2025: 238 · 2024: 271 · 2023: 283 · 2022: 285 · 2021: 293 · 2020: 196 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 15
FWCI
46.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial landmark detection, head pose estimation, facial action unit recognition, gaze estimation, affective computing, real-time face analysis, open-source software toolkit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review