Cited by 60Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisMental Health via Writing

Classifying major depressive disorder and response to deep brain stimulation over time by analyzing facial expressions

Open access
Jiang, Zifan, Harati, Sahar, Crowell, Andrea, Mayberg, Helen S., Nemati, Shamim, Clifford, Gari D.·2021·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder that leads to persistent changes in mood and interest among other signs and symptoms. We hypothesized that convolutional neural network (CNN) based automated facial expression recognition, pre-trained on an enormous auxiliary public dataset, could provide improve generalizable approach to MDD automatic assessment from videos, and classify remission or response to treatment. METHODS: We evaluated a novel deep neural network framework on 365 video interviews (88 hours) from a cohort of 12 depressed patients before and after deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment. Seven basic emotions were extracted with a Regional CNN detector and an Imagenet pre-trained CNN, both of which were trained on large-scale public datasets (comprising over a million images). Facial action units were also extracted with the Openface toolbox. Statistics of the temporal evolution of these image features over each recording were extracted and used to classify MDD remission and response to DBS treatment. RESULTS: An Area Under the Curve of 0.72 was achieved using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation for remission classification and 0.75 for response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates the potential for the classification of MDD remission and response to DBS treatment from passively acquired video captured during unstructured, unscripted psychiatric interviews. SIGNIFICANCE: This novel MDD evaluation could be used to augment current psychiatric evaluations and allow automatic, low-cost, frequent use when an expert isn't readily available or the patient is unwilling or unable to engage. Potentially, the framework may also be applied to other psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2020.3010472

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternative measures are under study, such as scales for symptom subdimensions or analysis of movements, speech, or facial expression.

    “alternative measures are under study for example scales for symptom subdimensions or analysis of movements, speech, or facial expression [82][83][84].”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [8]Ellgring H, Non-verbal communication in depression. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 4– 17.
  2. [12]Valstar M, Gratch J, Schuller B, “ AVEC 2016: Depression, mood, and emotion recognition workshop and challenge,” in Proc. ACM Int. Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge, 2016, pp. 3– 10.
  3. [13]Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK, Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1996, pp. 490– 498.
  4. [15]Valstar M, Schuller B, Smith K, “ AVEC 2014: 3D dimensional affect and depression recognition challenge,” in Proc. ACM Int. Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge, 2014, pp. 3– 10.
  5. [33]Ren S, He K, Girshick R, “ Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, 2015, pp. 91– 99.
  6. [39]Friesen E and Ekman P, Facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1978, vol. 3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, Z., Harati, S., Crowell, A., Mayberg, H. S., Nemati, S., & Clifford, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • UC San Diego Health System (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2021-02
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
664-672
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W3044580164
Cited by
60
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Cox Foundation
  • NSF (1822378)
  • NIH (UH3NS103550)
  • Hope for Depression Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
major depressive disorder, deep brain stimulation, facial expression recognition, treatment response classification, convolutional neural networks, facial action units, automated mental health assessment
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review