Cited by 8Face recognition and analysisFace Recognition and PerceptionHuman Pose and Action Recognition

Deep Entwined Learning Head Pose and Face Alignment Inside an Attentional Cascade with Doubly-Conditional fusion

Open access
Dapogny, Arnaud, Bailly, Kevin, Cord, Matthieu·2020·2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2020)

Abstract

Head pose estimation and face alignment constitute a backbone preprocessing for many applications relying on face analysis. While both are closely related tasks, they are generally addressed separately, e.g. by deducing the head pose from the landmark locations. In this paper, we propose to entwine face alignment and head pose tasks inside an attentional cascade. This cascade uses a geometry transfer network for integrating heterogeneous annotations to enhance landmark localization accuracy. Furthermore, we propose a doubly-conditional fusion scheme to select relevant feature maps, and regions thereof, based on a current head pose and landmark localization estimate. We empirically show the benefit of entwining head pose and landmark localization objectives inside our architecture, and that the proposed AC-DC model enhances the state-of-the-art accuracy on multiple databases for both face alignment and head pose estimation tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fg47880.2020.00038

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. L. Yue, X. Miao, P. Wang, B. Zhang, X. Zhen, and X. Cao. Attentional alignment network. BMVC, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dapogny, A., Bailly, K., & Cord, M.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2020)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-11
Pages
192-198
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016976725
Cited by
8
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE33-0002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
head pose estimation, facial landmark detection, multi-task learning, facial analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review