Cited by 1,171Face recognition and analysisEmotion and Mood RecognitionFace Recognition and Perception

A 3D Facial Expression Database For Facial Behavior Research

Lijun Yin, Xiaozhou Wei, Yi Sun, Jun Wang, Rosato, M.J.·2006·7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06)

Abstract

Traditionally, human facial expressions have been studied using either 2D static images or 2D video sequences. The 2D-based analysis is incapable of handing large pose variations. Although 3D modeling techniques have been extensively used for 3D face recognition and 3D face animation, barely any research on 3D facial expression recognition using 3D range data has been reported. A primary factor for preventing such research is the lack of a publicly available 3D facial expression database. In this paper, we present a newly developed 3D facial expression database, which includes both prototypical 3D facial expression shapes and 2D facial textures of 2,500 models from 100 subjects. This is the first attempt at making a 3D facial expression database available for the research community, with the ultimate goal of fostering the research on affective computing and increasing the general understanding of facial behavior and the fine 3D structure inherent in human facial expressions. The new database can be a valuable resource for algorithm assessment, comparison and evaluation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fgr.2006.6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, L., Wei, X., Sun, Y., Wang, J., & Rosato, M. J.
Affiliations
Binghamton University (US)
Venue
7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006-04-28
Pages
211-216
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137306662
Cited by
1,171
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 57
FWCI
25.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0414029, 0541044)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
facial expression recognition, 3D range data, facial behavior, affective computing, 3D face models, facial texture, pose variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review