The use of digital manipulatives in k-12: robotics, GPS/GIS and programming
Abstract
Faculty from 4-H Youth Development, Biosystems Engineering, and Education have collaborated to develop and implement an innovative robotics and geospatial technologies program, delivered in an informal learning setting of 4-H clubs and afterschool programs. Aimed at middle school youth, the program uses robotics and global positioning system (GPS) receivers and geographic information system (GIS) software to provide hands-on, self-directed learning experiences that promote personalized comprehension of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) concepts through experimentation. The goals of the program are to prepare youth for the 21stCentury workplace by providing them opportunities to learn STEM concepts and foster positive attitudes about STEM. Funded by the National Science Foundation, the project has undergone extensive research and evaluation over the three years of the project. Results have focused on the project's impact on: a) youth learning of computer programming, mathematics, geospatial concepts, and engineering/robotics concepts and b) youth attitudes and motivation towards science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In contrast to the preponderance of research on educational robotics relying on anecdotal and descriptive strategies, this research uses empirical, quantitative methods involving the use of comparison groups and pre-post analyses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review
Benitti, F. B. V. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006 · Cited by 1,200 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019) · Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) · doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1223 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
The Role of Robotics Teams’ Collaboration Quality on Team Performance in a Robotics Tournament
Menekse, M., Higashi, R., Schunn, C. D., & Baehr, E. (2017) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20178 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
- Venue
- 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-10
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0190-5848 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116668722
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons@UNO (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- American Society for Engineering Education
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- educational robotics, GPS/GIS, programming education, STEM education, middle school youth, 4-H, after-school programs, informal learning, digital manipulatives, youth motivation, engineering concepts, mathematics learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review