Cited by 81Educational Robotics and EngineeringProblem and Project Based LearningTeam Dynamics and Performance

The Role of Robotics Teams’ Collaboration Quality on Team Performance in a Robotics Tournament

Menekse, Muhsin, Higashi, Ross, Schunn, Christian D., Baehr, Emily·2017·Journal of Engineering Education

Abstract

Background Working effectively in teams is an important 21st century skill as well as a fundamental component of the ABET professional competencies. However, successful teamwork is challenging, and empirical studies with adolescents concerning how the collaboration quality of team members is related to team performance are limited. Purpose/Hypothesis This study investigated the relationship between team collaboration quality and team performance in a robotics competition using multiple measures of team performance, including both objective task performance and expert judge evaluations, on a diverse set of supporting performance dimensions. Design/Method Data included Table Score, Robot Design, Research Project, Core Values, and Collaboration Quality scores for 366 youths on 61 K‐8 robotics teams that participated in a FIRST LEGO League Championship. Regression and mediation analyses were conducted to explore the relation between effective team collaboration and team performance. Furthermore, analysis of variance was conducted to explore the relationship between Collaboration Quality and team experience. Results Collaboration Quality was a good predictor of robotics team performance across all measures (with R2 = .50 and p < .001). Mediation analysis revealed that the Robot Design acted as a full mediator for the predictive effect of Collaboration Quality on the Table Score. In addition, the cumulative amount of team experience was significantly related to Collaboration Qualit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jee.20178

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • K-12 educational robots and robotics competitions have emerged as highly popular educational activities that actively engage children in critical thinking and problem solving in team settings.

    “K-12 educational robots and robotics competitions have emerged as highly popular educational activities that actively engage children in critical thinking and problem solving in team settings (Menekse, Higashi, Schunn, & Baehr, 2017).”

    From A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics (2019) · cites this paper as Menekse et al., 2017

  • Prior studies argued that educational robotics and participation on a robotics team have the potential to significantly influence a child's academic and social skills by allowing them to actively engage in critical thinking and problem solving through designing, assembling, coding, operating, and modifying robots for specific goals.

    “Prior studies argued that educational robotics and participation on a robotics team have the potential to significantly influence a child's academic and social skills by allowing them to actively engage in critical thinking and problem solving through designing, assembling, coding, operating, and modifying robots for specific goals (Menekse, Higashi, Schunn, & Baehr, 2017).”

    From A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics (2019) · cites this paper as Menekse et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menekse, M., Higashi, R., Schunn, C. D., & Baehr, E.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Engineering Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10
Volume
106
Issue
4
Pages
564-584
ISSN
  • 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-9830
OpenAlex
W2770420532
Cited by
80
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
team performance, FIRST LEGO League, K-8 students, robot design, team experience, teamwork skills, engineering competitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review