Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Input selection for ANFIS learning

Jang, J.-S.R.·2002·Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

We present a quick and straightfoward way of input selection for neuro-fuzzy modeling using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS). The method is tested on two real-world problems: the nonlinear regression problem of automobile MPG (miles per gallon) prediction, and the nonlinear system identification using the Box and Jenkins gas furnace data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fuzzy.1996.552396

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Jang, J.-S. R.
Venue
Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Fuzzy Systems
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2002-12-24
Volume
2
Pages
1493-1499
ISSN
1098-7584 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103499201
Cited by
378
References
1
FWCI
14.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Input selection for ANFIS learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/fuzzy.1996.552396
The paper
Jang, J.-S. R. (2002). Input selection for ANFIS learning. Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/fuzzy.1996.552396

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.