Cited by 9ECG Monitoring and AnalysisAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing

Fixed complexity tiny reservoir heterogeneous network for on-line ECG learning of anomalies

Abdennadher, Norhen, Pau, Danilo, Bruna, Arcangelo·2021·2021 IEEE 10th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)

Abstract

The electrocardiogram (ECG), being one of the most extensively used signals to monitor cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), captures the heart’s arrhythmias. Patients with such pathology are often monitored for extended periods of time, requiring data storage, and a very time-consuming off-line search of anomalies. This is especially inefficient when indicative patterns in the biological signals are infrequent, requiring more analysis time of medical doctors, and entailing a difficult visual search task for the diagnosis.In this paper, we propose an automated deep learning pipeline based on reservoir computing (RC), followed by principal component analysis (PCA) and one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM), that can be used to perform on-line learning and real-time anomaly detection of pathological conditions and therefore to raise warnings. The learning step requires fixed computational complexity and memory that are affordable on a low-power microcontroller unit (MCU). During the learning phase, it uses a very limited amount of input data, e.g., 60 KB, which makes this work suitable for fast personalization when device restart is required. The detection accuracy has been evaluated on the publicly available MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset, also modified to mimic temporal sliding of input tensors on the ECG streaming data. Best F1 score and accuracy are 91.5%, 95.4% with variance over the processed data of 0.001.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/gcce53005.2021.9622022

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Works before TinyML, such as [108], use CNN to classify audios captured through smartphones.

    “Works already exist before adopting TinyML in the process, such as [108], where they use CNN to classify audios captured through smartphones.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [108]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdennadher, N., Pau, D., & Bruna, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • STMicroelectronics (Italy) (IT)
Venue
2021 IEEE 10th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10-12
Pages
233-237
OpenAlex
W4200560403
Cited by
9
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Keywords
reservoir computing, ECG anomaly detection, arrhythmia detection, online learning, one-class support vector machine, principal component analysis, real-time anomaly detection, low-power microcontroller, MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, wearable health monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review