Cited by 19Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingSimulation and Modeling Applications

Federated Deep Learning for Immersive Virtual Reality over Wireless Networks

Chen, Mingzhe, Semiari, Omid, Saad, Walid, Liu, Xuanlin, Yin, Changchuan·2019·2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)

Abstract

In this paper, the problem of enhancing the virtual reality (VR) experience for wireless users is investigated by minimizing the occurrence of breaks in presence (BIPs) that can detach the users from their virtual world. To measure the BIPs for wireless VR users, a novel model that jointly considers the VR applications, transmission delay, VR video quality, and users' awareness of the virtual environment is proposed. In the developed model, the base stations (BSs) transmit VR videos to the wireless VR users using directional transmission links so as to increase the data rate of VR users, thus, reducing the number of BIPs for each user. Therefore, the mobility and orientation of VR users must be considered when minimizing BIPs, since the body movements of a VR user may result in blockage of its wireless link. The BIP problem is formulated as an optimization problem which jointly considers the predictions of users' mobility patterns, orientations, and their BS association. To predict the orientation and mobility patterns of VR users, a distributed learning algorithm based on the machine learning framework of deep echo state networks (ESNs) is proposed. The proposed algorithm uses concept from federated learning to enable multiple BSs to locally train their deep ESNs using their collected data and cooperatively build a learning model to predict the entire users' mobility patterns and orientations. Using these predictions, the user association policy that minimizes BIPs is derived. Simulation results demonstrate that the developed algorithm reduces the users' BIPs by up to 16% and 26%, respectively, compared to centralized ESN and deep learning algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/globecom38437.2019.9013419

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hospital mortality prediction, duration of stay, or rather the rate of admission can also be examined using FL-based models for the proper management of some critical care units in the hospital while protecting the privacy of in-hospital data.

    “Hospital mortality prediction, duration of stay, or rather the rate of admission can also be examined using FL-based models for the proper management of some critical care units in the hospital while protecting the privacy of in-hospital data [161, 166].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M., Semiari, O., Saad, W., Liu, X., & Yin, C.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-12
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1930-529X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010263244
Cited by
19
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Globecom (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
Keywords
federated learning, virtual reality, deep echo state network, user mobility prediction, base station association, transmission delay, distributed learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review