Cited by 23Robot Manipulation and LearningRobotics and Automated SystemsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Collaborative Robotics in Construction: A Test Case on Screwing Gypsum Boards on Ceiling

Gautam, Milan, Fagerlund, Hannu, Greicevci, Blerand, Christophe, Francois, Havula, Jarmo·2020·2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD)

Abstract

The use of collaborative robots (cobots) and human robot collaboration has started to increase in diverse industrial areas in the past years. However, cobots are seldom applied in construction work even if there is a growing need for robotics solutions in this area. This study aims to present the possibilities of applying lightweight cobots for single tasks in the construction sector. This paper presents the development of a proof-of-concept dedicated to screwing gypsum board panels to the ceiling of a room. After identifying the challenges related to this task, we present the cobot solution that we implemented for this purpose. Our results show that repetitive screwing work in upright position achieved by cobot can benefit workers by removing ergonomical strain. At the same time, cobot ensures that this task is achieved with constant performance. Future research directions lead to the search for better accuracy in screw positioning and more dynamic ways of collaboration with human workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/gtsd50082.2020.9303061

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Presenting of light robotics together with 3D printing technology provides the rapid advantage of prototyping to test ideas and applications.

    “Presenting of light robotics together with 3D printing technology provides the rapid advantage of prototyping to test ideas and applications.”
  • The simplest visual system was used to follow a simplified approach, which can be controlled directly by a robot controller.

    “The simplest visual system was used to follow a simplified approach, which can be controlled directly by a robot controller.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gautam, M., Fagerlund, H., Greicevci, B., Christophe, F., & Havula, J.
Affiliations
Häme University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Venue
2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-11-27
Pages
88-93
OpenAlex
W3113907864
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
collaborative robots, human-robot collaboration, construction robotics, repetitive work, ergonomic strain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review