Collaborative Robotics in Construction: A Test Case on Screwing Gypsum Boards on Ceiling
Abstract
The use of collaborative robots (cobots) and human robot collaboration has started to increase in diverse industrial areas in the past years. However, cobots are seldom applied in construction work even if there is a growing need for robotics solutions in this area. This study aims to present the possibilities of applying lightweight cobots for single tasks in the construction sector. This paper presents the development of a proof-of-concept dedicated to screwing gypsum board panels to the ceiling of a room. After identifying the challenges related to this task, we present the cobot solution that we implemented for this purpose. Our results show that repetitive screwing work in upright position achieved by cobot can benefit workers by removing ergonomical strain. At the same time, cobot ensures that this task is achieved with constant performance. Future research directions lead to the search for better accuracy in screw positioning and more dynamic ways of collaboration with human workers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Presenting of light robotics together with 3D printing technology provides the rapid advantage of prototyping to test ideas and applications.
“Presenting of light robotics together with 3D printing technology provides the rapid advantage of prototyping to test ideas and applications.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
The simplest visual system was used to follow a simplified approach, which can be controlled directly by a robot controller.
“The simplest visual system was used to follow a simplified approach, which can be controlled directly by a robot controller.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12010135 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gautam, M., Fagerlund, H., Greicevci, B., Christophe, F., & Havula, J.
- Affiliations
- Häme University of Applied Sciences (FI)
- ORCID
- Havula, Jarmo
- Venue
- 2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-11-27
- Pages
- 88-93
- OpenAlex
- W3113907864
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Keywords
- collaborative robots, human-robot collaboration, construction robotics, repetitive work, ergonomic strain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review