Cited by 54Tactile and Sensory InteractionsHuman auditory perception and evaluationTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

Perceptual space and adjective rating of sinusoidal vibrations perceived via mobile device

Inwook Hwang, Choi, Seungmoon·2010·2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium

Abstract

In the past five years, how to utilize the haptics technology in the mobile device to improve its limited user interface has emerged as an attractive research topic. In this paper, we report two kinds of perceptual data related to vibrotactile signals perceived through a mobile device held in the hand. In Experiment I, we estimated perceptual dissimilarities between sinusoidal vibrations with seven frequencies in 40–250 Hz and two amplitudes of 30 and 40 dB SL. Multi-dimensional scaling was then applied to the perceptual distances, and led to a two-dimensional perceptual space. In the perceptual space, the vibrations of the two amplitudes formed distinct groups. The two groups showed similar structures with respect to the frequency variation. In particular, two perceptual dimensions that spanned a low frequency range (40–100 Hz) and a high frequency range (100–250 Hz) were close to be orthogonal. In Experiment II, we evaluated the subjective qualities of sinusoidal vibrations with different frequencies via adjective rating. Thirteen adjective pairs were carefully selected, and rated for the sinusoidal vibrations played through the mobile device. The results were regressed to the perceptual space, revealing several adjective pairs that can largely account for the distributions of vibration points in the perceptual space, such as ‘dark-bright,’ ‘dull-clear,’ ‘slow-fast,’ ‘vague-distinct,’ ‘thick-thin,’ and ‘heavy-light.’ The findings of this paper can help understand the percep…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/haptic.2010.5444692

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the perceptual space of vibrotactile stimuli, qualitative differences are expressed by two distinct perceptual axes: 40-100 Hz vibrations categorized as smooth and clear, and 100-250 Hz vibrations categorized as jagged and bumpy.

    “In the perceptual space of vibrotactile stimuli, such qualitative differences are expressed by two distinct perceptual axes composed of 40-100 Hz vibrations (categorized as smooth and clear) and 100-250 Hz vibrations (categorized as jagged and bumpy), respectively [33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, I., & Choi, S.
Affiliations
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-03
Pages
1-8
ISSN
2324-7347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121600979
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Haptics Symposium (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National IT Industry Promotion Agency
  • Iran Telecommunication Research Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Human auditory perception and evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
vibrotactile perception, sinusoidal vibration, perceptual space, adjective ratings, multidimensional scaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review