The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blogs are Echo Chambers: Blogs are Echo Chambers
Abstract
In the last decade, blogs have exploded in number, popularity and scope. However, many commentators and researchers speculate that blogs isolate readers in echo chambers, cutting them off from dissenting opinions. Our empirical paper tests this hypothesis. Using a hand-coded sample of over 1,000 comments from 33 of the world's top blogs, we find that agreement outnumbers disagreement in blog comments by more than 3 to 1. However, this ratio depends heavily on a blog's genre, varying between 2 to 1 and 9 to 1. Using these hand-coded blog comments as input, we also show that natural language processing techniques can identify the linguistic markers of agreement. We conclude by applying our empirical and algorithmic findings to practical implications for blogs, and discuss the many questions raised by our work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Echo chambers have been shown to exist in various forms of online media such as blogs, forums, and social media sites.
“Echo chambers have been shown to exist in various forms of online media such as blogs (24), forums (25), and social media sites (26–28).”
From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes
Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l · Cited by 3,034
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Deviation, rejection and communication
Schachter, S. (1951) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062326 · Cited by 1,165
Panacea or Panopticon?: The Hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication
SPEARS, R., & LEA, M. (1994) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365094021004001 · Cited by 705
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- glickman, 2005, a probabilistic classification approach for lexical textual entailment, Proc AAAI
- resnik, 1995, using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy, Proc IJCAI, 448
- gabrilovich, 2007, computing semantic relatedness using wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis, Proc IJCAI, 6
- schachter, 1976, an application of acoustic surface wave devices to communication receivers, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 23, 1053, 10.1109/T-ED.1976.18535 · DOI
- 10.3115/1218955.1219040 · DOI
- pennebaker, 1999, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count
- 0, Firebug
- rennie, 2003, tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers, Proc ICML
- frakes, 1992, Information Retrieval Data Structures and Algorithms
- fellbaum, 1998, WordNet An Electronic Lexical Database, 10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.3115/1219840.1219885 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.645 · DOI
- facebook, 0, Politics
- 10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x · DOI · Paper page
- habermas, 1991, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgois Society
- 0, Technorati Popular Top 100 blogs
- sunstein, 2006, Infotopia How Many Minds Produce Knowledge
- sunstein, 2003, Why Societies Need Dissent
- sunstein, 2002, Republic com
- witten, 2005, Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
- 10.3115/1073445.1073478 · DOI
- 10.3115/1610075.1610122 · DOI
- wilhelm, 2000, Democracy in the Digital Age Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace
- 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x · DOI
- 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265271 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00238.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5210/fm.v11i9.1393 · DOI
- 10.1080/13691180801947976 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · DOI · Paper page
- mill, 1848, Principles of Political Economy
- altman, 1990, Practical Statistics for Medical Research, 10.1201/9780429258589 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2685469 · DOI
- 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1134271.1134277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
- bishop, 2008, The Big Sort Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart
- 10.1145/1357054.1357228 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3115/1118693.1118704 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jesp.1996.0024 · DOI
- negroponte, 1996, Being Digital
- armstrong, 2006, Crashing the Gate Netroots Grassroots and the Rise of People-Powered Politics
- 0, Chickenfoot
- 10.1007/BF00058655 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The echo chamber effect on social media
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2023301118 · Cited by 2,092
“Echo chambers have been shown to exist in various forms of online media such as blogs (24), forums (25), and social media sites (26–28).”
BackgroundECHO CHAMBERS AND EPISTEMIC BUBBLES
Nguyen, C. T. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2018.32 · Cited by 1,115
Dynamic debates: an analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter
Yardi, S., & Boyd, D. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610380011 · Cited by 625
Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship
Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186139 · Cited by 335
No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit
De Francisci Morales, G., Monti, C., & Starnini, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81531-x · Cited by 98
Opinion dynamics with backfire effect and biased assimilation
Chen, X., Tsaparas, P., Lijffijt, J., & De Bie, T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256922 · Cited by 39
Koiranen, I., Koivula, A., Keipi, T., & Saarinen, A. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.009 · Cited by 32
Cross-community affinity: A polarization measure for multi-community networks
Nair, S., & Iamnitchi, A. (2024) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100280 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, É., Bergstrom, T., & Karahalios, K. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Éric Gilbert
- Venue
- 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125815607
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- blogs, echo chambers, blog comments, agreement and disagreement, online discourse, natural language processing, blog genre
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review