Cited by 30Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health via WritingMachine Learning in Healthcare

Text Mining the EMR for Modeling and Predicting Suicidal Behavior among US Veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf War

Ben-Ari, Alon, Hammond, Kenric·2015·2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Abstract

Suicide is an important public health problem and prominent among U.S. Veterans and active duty troops. Prediction of suicide and suicide attempts is problematic because these are low-frequency events and traditional clinical screening approaches have a high false positive rate. Large clinical databases extracted from electronic health records permit study of suicidal behavior in larger populations than previously possible using sampling techniques. In addition to offering structured data, text search and classification methods can identify additional risk variables. Data extracted from clinical records of 250,000 veterans were modeled using machine learning methodology. To predict suicide attempts in this population over a 10 year period. In contrast to previously reported models, our results showed high specificity and a false positive rate of 0.5%, contrasting with other studies showing false positive rates exceeding 20%. The model showed lower specificity with a true positive rate of 27% and a false negative rate of 73%. These results suggest that a machine learning approach developed with large data sets can usefully supplement current approaches to prediction of suicidal behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hicss.2015.382

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research indicates that mental health conditions were inadequately recorded as structured ICD or SNOMED codes in EHRs, but were more likely to be documented in patient notes.

    “Previous research indicates that mental health conditions were inadequately recorded as structured ICD or SNOMED codes in EHRs, but were more likely to be documented in patient notes38.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 12 · Cited by 30

Authors
Ben-Ari, A., & Hammond, K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-01
Pages
3168-3175
ISSN
1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1545404249
Cited by
30
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
17.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
suicide risk prediction, suicidal behavior, Gulf War veterans, electronic health records, text mining, medical records, suicide attempts, machine learning, risk factors, false positive rate, military veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review