The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matchmaking: distributed resource management for high throughput computing
Abstract
Conventional resource management systems use a system model to describe resources and a centralized scheduler to control their allocation. We argue that this paradigm does not adapt well to distributed systems, particularly those built to support high throughput computing. Obstacles include heterogeneity of resources, which make uniform allocation algorithms difficult to formulate, and distributed ownership, leading to widely varying allocation policies. Faced with these problems, we developed and implemented the classified advertisement (classad) matchmaking framework, a flexible and general approach to resource management in distributed environment with decentralized ownership of resources. Novel aspects of the framework include a semi structured data model that combines schema, data, and query in a simple but powerful specification language, and a clean separation of the matching and claiming phases of resource allocation. The representation and protocols result in a robust, scalable and flexible framework that can evolve with changing resources. The framework was designed to solve real problems encountered in the deployment of Condor, a high throughput computing system developed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Condor is heavily used by scientists at numerous sites around the world. It derives much of its robustness and efficiency from the matchmaking architecture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-scale cluster management at Google with Borg
Verma, A., Pedrosa, L., Korupolu, M., Oppenheimer, D., Tune, E., & Wilkes, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/2741948.2741964 · Cited by 1,468
A Software Defined Fog Node Based Distributed Blockchain Cloud Architecture for IoT
Sharma, P. K., Chen, M.-Y., & Park, J. H. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2757955 · Cited by 676
QoS guided Min-Min heuristic for grid task scheduling
He, X., Sun, X., & von Laszewski, G. (2003) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/bf02948918 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Raman, R., Livny, M., & Solomon, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings. The Seventh International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (Cat. No.98TB100244)
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-27
- Pages
- 140-146
- OpenAlex
- W1809943808
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matchmaking: distributed resource management for high throughput computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/hpdc.1998.709966
- The paper
- Raman, R., Livny, M., & Solomon, M. (2002). Matchmaking: distributed resource management for high throughput computing. Proceedings. The Seventh International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (Cat. No.98TB100244). https://doi.org/10.1109/hpdc.1998.709966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.