Cited by 676IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingBlockchain Technology Applications and SecuritySoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

A Software Defined Fog Node Based Distributed Blockchain Cloud Architecture for IoT

Open access
Sharma, Pradip Kumar, Chen, Mu-Yen, Park, Jong Hyuk·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

The recent expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the consequent explosion in the volume of data produced by smart devices have led to the outsourcing of data to designated data centers. However, to manage these huge data stores, centralized data centers, such as cloud storage cannot afford auspicious way. There are many challenges that must be addressed in the traditional network architecture due to the rapid growth in the diversity and number of devices connected to the internet, which is not designed to provide high availability, real-time data delivery, scalability, security, resilience, and low latency. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel blockchain-based distributed cloud architecture with a software defined networking (SDN) enable controller fog nodes at the edge of the network to meet the required design principles. The proposed model is a distributed cloud architecture based on blockchain technology, which provides low-cost, secure, and on-demand access to the most competitive computing infrastructures in an IoT network. By creating a distributed cloud infrastructure, the proposed model enables cost-effective high-performance computing. Furthermore, to bring computing resources to the edge of the IoT network and allow low latency access to large amounts of data in a secure manner, we provide a secure distributed fog node architecture that uses SDN and blockchain techniques. Fog nodes are distributed fog computing entities that allow the deployment of fog services, and are formed by multiple computing resources at the edge of the IoT network. We evaluated the performance of our proposed architecture and compared it with the existing models using various performance measures. The results of our evaluation show that performance is improved by reducing the induced delay, reducing the response time, increasing throughput, and the ability to detect real-time attacks in the IoT network with low performance overheads.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2017.2757955

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a flooding attack, the architecture in [102] balances load between fog nodes using blockchain and an SDN algorithm.

    “In the specific case of a flooding attack, the architecture is able to balance the load between the fog nodes thanks to the use of the blockchain and an SDN algorithm.”

    From A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things (2018) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, P. K., Chen, M.-Y., & Park, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • National Taichung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
115-124
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2757817063
Cited by
676
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 47
FWCI
54.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) (IITP-2017-2014-0-00720-002)
  • IITP (Institute for Information and communications Technology Promotion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
Internet of Things, blockchain, software-defined networking, fog computing, fog nodes, distributed cloud architecture, edge computing, low latency, real-time attack detection, Internet of Things security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review