CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105Social Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology InteractionTechnology Use by Older Adults

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robots for Joy, Robots for Sorrow: Community Based Robot Design for Dementia Caregivers

Moharana, Sanika, Panduro, Alejandro E., Lee, Hee Rin, Riek, Laurel D.·2019·2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
DOI 10.1109/hri.2019.8673206
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Many new technologies are being built to support people with dementia. However, they largely focus on the people with dementia; consequently, informal caregivers, one of the most important stakeholders in dementia care, remain invisible within the technology design space. In this paper, we present a six-month long, community-based design research process where we collaborated with dementia caregiver support groups to design robots for dementia caregiving. The contributions of this paper are threefold. First, we broaden the context of dementia robot design to give a more prominent role to informal family care-givers in the co-design process. Second, we provide new design guidelines that contextualize robots within the family caregiving paradigm, which suggest new roles and behaviors of robots. These include lessening emotional labor by communicating information caregivees do not want to hear (e.g., regarding diet or medication) or providing redirection during emotionally difficult times, as well as facilitating positive shared moments. Third, our work found connections between certain robot attributes and their relationship to the stage of dementia a caregivee is experiencing. For example, caregivers wanted their robots to facilitate interaction with their caregivees in early stages of dementia, yet be in the background. However, for later stages of dementia, they wanted robots to replace caregiver-caregivee interaction to lessen their emotional burden, and be foregrounded. These connections provide important insights in to how we think about adaptability and long-term interaction in HRI. We hope our work provides new avenues for HRI researchers to studying robots for dementia caregivers by engaging in community-based design.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hri.2019.8673206

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 81 references

4 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 2018, National research summit on care services and supports for persons with dementia and their caregivers
  2. tapus, 2008, Cognitive assistance and physical therapy for dementia patients using socially assistive robots, Social Interaction with Intelligent Indoor Robots (SI3R)
  3. 0, Social security database
  4. riek, 2011, Exposure to cinematic depictions of robots and attitudes towards them, Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Workshop on Expectations and Intuitive Human-Robot Interaction
  5. 2015, Caregiving in the US, National Alliance for Caregiving and the AARP Public Policy Institute, 1
  6. council, 2010, Informal caregivers in the united states Prevalence caregiver characteristics and ability to provide care
  7. lynn, 2015, Frail frightened and forgotten Our fate unless we change it

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–105 of 105

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moharana, S., Panduro, A. E., Lee, H. R., & Riek, L. D.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
ORCID
Venue
2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-03
Pages
458-467
DOI
10.1109/hri.2019.8673206
OpenAlex
W2931420217
Cited by
104
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
14.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
dementia caregiving, informal caregivers, assistive robots, human-robot interaction, community-based design, co-design, design guidelines, emotional labor, family caregiving, robot adaptability, long-term interaction, caregiver support groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review