Participatory Design, Development, and Testing of Assistive Health Robots with Older Adults: An International Four-year Project
Open accessAbstract
Participatory design includes stakeholders in the development of products intended to solve real-life challenges. Involving end users in the design of robots is vital for developing effective, useful, acceptable and user-friendly products that meet expectations, needs, and preferences. This four-year international project developed and evaluated a home-based robot for mood stabilization and cognitive improvement in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and age-related health needs. The daily-care robot was developed in collaboration with experts, carers, relatives, and older adults, through six phases. Two phases were dedicated to cognitive stimulation games. This paper provides a summary of the participatory design and mixed-methods evaluation processes undertaken to develop, refine, and test the robot. The final robot and games were acceptable to older adults, and useful for delivering stimulating activities and providing reminders for medication, health and wellbeing checks. Personalization is required to optimize human-robot interaction, and imagery and speech should be consistent with local users. Functions should be personalizable to accommodate individual health needs and preferences. This project highlights the importance of participatory design and testing robotics in end-user environments, as technical issues associated with long-term use were uncovered. Recommendations for future development and the design of assistive health robots are made.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In Phase 4, multiple issues hindered the usability of the games.
“However, participants, experts, and observational data demonstrated that multiple issues hindered usability of the games.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The safety and security theme was reported by 76% (25/33) of participants.
“The second theme was equally important (76%, 25/33) and included helping with safety and security.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Five main themes were evident from the Phase 3 analysis: interactions, benefits, the robot, improved functionality, and technical difficulties.
“Five main themes were evident from the analysis: interactions, benefits, the robot, improved functionality, and technical difficulties [40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The daily challenges theme was reported by 76% (25/33) of participants and included the robot helping with daily challenges, such as giving reminders for daily schedules.
“The first was reported by 76% (25/33) of participants and included the robot helping with daily challenges, such as giving reminders for daily schedules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Phase 3 experts commented on problems with voice recognition and pressing the touchscreen.
“Experts especially commented on problems with voice recognition and pressing the touchscreen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingcitation
Four main themes were evident from the Phase 2 analysis: interactions, benefits, the robot, and improved functionality.
“Four main themes were evident from the analysis: interactions, benefits, the robot, and improved functionality [40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Older adults found the final robot and its games acceptable.
“The final robot and games were acceptable to older adults, and useful for delivering stimulating activities and providing reminders for medication, health and wellbeing checks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Technical issues associated with long-term use were uncovered.
“This project highlights the importance of participatory design and testing robotics in end-user environments, as technical issues associated with long-term use were uncovered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Four main topics emerged from the Phase 1 analysis: daily challenges, safety and security, monitoring health and well-being, and therapeutic intervention.
“Four main topics emerged from the analysis: daily challenges, safety and security, monitoring health and well-being, and therapeutic intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, Phase 4 experts thought that the concepts behind the games were appropriate for people with MCI/MD.
“Overall, experts thought that the concepts behind the games were appropriate for people with MCI/MD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some Phase 4 participants did not understand the instructions for the games.
“A significant concern was that some participants did not understand the instructions for the games.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Phase 2 participants identified additional functions such as video-calling family, more reminders, repeated reminders and orienting users to the time and day.
“Participants identified additional functions such as video-calling family, more reminders, repeated reminders and orienting users to the time and day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants in Phase 1 were generally positive about the potential use of robots in the homes of people with MCI.
“Participants were generally positive about the potential use of robots in the homes of people with MCI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The robot's pronunciation, accent, and language contributed to problems in understanding.
“The pronunciation, accent, and language of the robot also contributed to problems in understanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The second Phase 5 theme emphasized the potential value of personalized health and wellbeing reminders.
“The second theme emphasized the potential value of the personalized health and wellbeing reminders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Experts and older adults without MCI advocated for people they knew with dementia who were unable to take part.
“Experts and older adults without MCI were also able to advocate for people they knew with dementia, who were unable to take part.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The ideas for improvement were identified by stakeholders and potential future users.
“The ideas for improvement were identified by stakeholders and potential future users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Qualitative Phase 6 results indicated that cognitive stimulation games could be a valuable addition to existing cognitive stimulation activities for older adults.
“Qualitative results regarding usability and acceptability indicated that cognitive stimulation games could be a valuable addition to existing cognitive stimulation activities for older adults.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The four-year, multi-phase and international participatory design project led to the development of a daily-care service robot with and for older adults, called Bomy.
“This four-year, multi-phase and international participatory design project led to the development of a daily-care service robot with and for older adults, called Bomy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Phase 5 participants were overall accepting of having the robot in their homes.
“In the first theme (acceptance of robots), participants were overall accepting of having the robot in their homes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Five themes emerged from qualitative analysis of Phase 5 interviews: acceptance of robots, value of reminders, companionship, digital confidence and technical support, and room for improvement.
“Five themes were evident from qualitative analysis of the interviews: acceptance of robots, value of the reminders, companionship, digital confidence and technical support, and room for improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many older adults with diverse health needs and indirect users such as carers and relatives participated in designing the robot.
“Many older adults with diverse health needs and indirect users such as carers and relatives also participated in designing the robot.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Older adults who played the games also performed better on traditional paper and pen cognitive evaluations, compared to those who did not play the games.
“Older adults who played the games also performed better on traditional paper and pen cognitive evaluations, compared to those who did not play the games.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results from phases one, two and three indicated that cognitive stimulation games could be delivered on the robot, in alignment with the therapeutic intervention scenario.
“The results from phases one, two and three indicated that cognitive stimulation games could be delivered on the robot, in alignment with the therapeutic intervention scenario.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Nonpharmacological interventions are important for dementia.
- Premisecitation
Very few studies have explored unrestricted use of robots in natural environments and user perceptions of them thereafter.
“Despite the potential value of robots, very few studies have explored unrestricted use of them in natural environments and user perceptions of them thereafter [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Users have been shown to respond to robots better than tablets delivering the same healthcare instructions.
“Users have been shown to respond to robots better than tablets delivering the same healthcare instructions [44], which demonstrates additional benefits robots may provide in these settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The games were effective in reducing age-related thinning of the cerebral cortex.
“Importantly, the games were effective in reducing age-related thinning of the cerebral cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The Phase 1 scoping study found that a daily-care robot could be used for practical and therapeutic tasks in the homes of users, including tracking health/wellbeing and promoting safety and routine.
“Overall, through the participation of experts, carers, relatives and future users, this scoping study found that a daily-care robot could be used for practical and therapeutic tasks in the homes of users, including tracking health/wellbeing and promoting safety and routine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
It was evident from Phase 2 that Silbot may not be the most appropriate robot for this context, given its somewhat human-like appearance and use of arms.
“It was evident that Silbot may not be the most appropriate robot for this context, given its somewhat human-like appearance and use of arms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Self-selection bias may have been present across the studies, as participants volunteered to test the robot.
“As with most research on technology use, self-selection bias may have also been present across the studies, as participants volunteered to test the robot.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Self-selection may have meant the sample included were more enthusiastic toward robotic technology.
“This may have meant that the sample included were more enthusiastic toward robotic technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A lack of participants with MCI/MD in later phases meant that conclusions regarding the usability of the daily-care robot for people with MCI specifically cannot be confidently made.
“A lack of participants with MCI/MD in later phases meant that conclusions regarding the usability of the daily-care robot for people with MCI specifically cannot be confidently made.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Macular degeneration causes chromatic sensitivity.
“An adaptable color scheme could also be provided (e.g., more/less contrasting colors and changing the brightness and tone of the screen) as macular degeneration causes chromatic sensitivity [61].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Language issues indicated that the robot needed further improvement in translation from Korean.
“The issues in language suggested further improvement in translating the robot from Korean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Member checking was provided for most qualitative research approaches in this project.
“Member checking was provided for most qualitative research approaches in this project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Multiple independent coders with different academic backgrounds contributed to analyzing the data.
“Likewise, multiple independent coders with different academic backgrounds contributed to analyzing the data [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The iterative process meant that adaptations and changes were often made, as exemplified by improvements to the robots after each phase.
“Second, the iterative process meant that adaptations and changes were often made, as exemplified by improvements to the robots after each phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Using the robot for a long time period and in intended environments (homes and retirement villages) was important, as it uncovered specific technical issues that did not emerge during lab testing.
“Using the robot for a long time period and in their intended environment (individuals' homes and retirement villages) was important, as it uncovered specific technical issues (e.g., blocks disconnecting and lagging screen) that did not emerge during lab testing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Ongoing participation of experts in dementia care and older adults was crucial to designing robots that met user requirements.
“First, the ongoing participation of experts in dementia care and older adults was crucial to designing robots that met user requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By drawing on their experiences with conditions such as MCI, MD, hearing and vision impairments, and complex medication schedules, participants provided insightful recommendations for future development.
“By drawing on their experiences in living or working with conditions such as MCI, MD, hearing and vision impairments, and management of complex medication schedules, participants were able to provide insightful recommendations for future development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Feedback from users indicated that robots hold promise for use by older adults, especially in providing reminders for medication, health and wellbeing, and delivering cognitively stimulating games.
“The feedback from users indicated that robots hold promise for use by older adults, especially in providing reminders for medication, health and wellbeing, and delivering cognitively stimulating games [37,39,40,43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [37]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The Phase 4 evaluation was considered a proof-of-concept because of issues with the games.
“This evaluation was considered a proof-of-concept (demonstrating the general concept/idea of the games) due to issues with the games.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Only one screen game could be fully evaluated in Phase 4.
“Ultimately, only one screen game could be fully evaluated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
In Phase 5, older adults had unrestricted and unsupervised use of the daily-care robot prototype.
“In Phase 5, older adults had unrestricted and unsupervised use of the daily-care robot prototype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 61
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 59
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe final robot and games were useful for delivering stimulating activities and for providing reminders about medication, health, and wellbeing checks.
“The final robot and games were acceptable to older adults, and useful for delivering stimulating activities and providing reminders for medication, health and wellbeing checks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants in Phase 2 reported that the robot would be useful for companionship, giving reminders, responding to emergencies, providing safety checks, keeping a routine, and prompting exercise.
“The second theme focused on the benefits of the robot, with participants reporting that it would be useful for companionship, giving reminders, responding to emergencies, providing safety checks, keeping a routine, and prompting exercise:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the older adults (56%, 5/9) and 38% (6/16) of experts felt that monitoring health and wellbeing could be useful to monitor co-morbid conditions, like blood pressure.
“Some experts did not perceive this to be relevant for cognitive impairment, however, half of the older adults (56%, 5/9) and 38% (6/16) of experts felt that this could be useful to monitor co-morbid conditions, like blood pressure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants in Phase 2 suggested improving the interaction by showing text on the robot's screen, having a bigger screen and buttons, and speaking much more slowly.
“Participants made many suggestions for improving the interaction, including showing text on the robot's screen, having a bigger screen and buttons, and speaking much more slowly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome Phase 3 experts commented that the speech was still too fast and needed to be louder.
“Some commented that the speech was still too fast and needed to be louder:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 3 experts reported that the scenarios were useful and some expected that the robot could reduce caregiver burden.
“Experts reported that the scenarios were useful and some expected that the robot could reduce caregiver burden.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome Phase 2 participants thought that reminders needed to be personalized to each user.
“Some thought that these reminders needed to be personalized to each user.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA participant had difficulty playing the games because the robot's instructions were unclear and they did not know what to do.
“One of the observers reported the participant had difficulty playing the games because”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Phase 4, four older adults played one session, three played two and three played three sessions.
“Four older adults played one session, three played two and three played three sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn Phase 3, ten experts participated.
“Ten experts participated (nine females, one male).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome Phase 2 participants thought the humanlike appearance would help with building a relationship, while others liked the robotic aspects and did not want it to appear human-like.
“Some participants thought the humanlike appearance would help with building a relationship, while others liked the robotic aspects and did not want it to appear human-like.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPhase 4 participants highlighted advantages of the games, such as engaging their minds, making them concentrate and focus on the present.
“Participants highlighted advantages of the games, such as engaging their minds, making them concentrate and focus on the present:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome Phase 3 experts desired for the medication reminders to be more detailed.
“Some also desired for the medication reminders to be more detailed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe Phase 4 older adults were between 75 to 101 years old.
“The older adults were between 75 to 101 years old.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were mixed reactions in Phase 4 when asked if they would like to play the games again, with mean scores 1.95 (SD 0.83) and 2.00 (SD 0.89) on a scale of 1 'very much' to 3 'not much'.
“However, there were mixed reactions when asked if they would like to play the games again (on a scale of 1 'very much' to 3 'not much', mean scores were 1.95 (SD 0.83) and 2.00 (SD 0.89), respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany Phase 2 participants questioned the purpose of the arms, which were distracting and too noisy.
“Many questioned the purpose of the arms, which were distracting and too noisy:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome Phase 4 participants found the games boring and repetitive and lost interest.
“Other participants found the games boring and repetitive and therefore lost interest:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome Phase 3 experts believed that the face and body language humanized the robot.
“Again, some believed that the face and body language humanized the robot;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 3 experts stated that the interaction was stimulating and believed that the reminders especially would help to trigger memory.
“Overall, the experts stated that the interaction was stimulating and believed that the reminders especially would help to trigger memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTouch sensitivity and problems with dragging motion across the screen were barriers in Phase 4.
“Another barrier was the touch sensitivity and problems with the dragging motion across the screen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 4 participants were satisfied with the dressing and cooking games overall, with mean ratings 1.50 (SD 0.85) and 1.33 (SD 0.52) on a scale from 1 'satisfied' to 3 'dissatisfied'.
“The questionnaire results demonstrated that the participants were satisfied with the dressing and cooking games overall, (mean ratings 1.50 (SD 0.85) and 1.33 (SD 0.52), respectively, on a scale from 1 'satisfied' to 3 'dissatisfied').”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther Phase 3 experts reported that the robot was too automated and looked robotic, and that arm movements, flashing lights and facial expressions could overload someone with MCI/MD.
“However, others reported that it was too automated and looked robotic.The arm movements, flashing lights and facial expressions were identified to possibly overload someone with MCI/MD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn Phase 2, nine older adults and nine experts participated.
“Nine older adults (five females, four males) and nine experts (six females, three males) participated by watching the video scenarios of Silbot interacting with a user and responding to interview questions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 3 experts suggested adding more activities, more reminders and personalizing the interaction to a user's needs.
“Examples included adding more activities, more reminders and personalizing the interaction to a user's needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 3 experts were satisfied with the simplicity of the interaction, clear screen, big buttons and voice activation, and perceived the robot to be easy to use.
“The experts were satisfied with the simplicity of the interaction, clear screen, big buttons and voice activation, and perceived the robot to be easy to use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Phase 4, a total of 10 older adults and two experts helped to test the cognitive games.
“A total of 10 older adults (six females, four males) helped to test the cognitive games, while two experts were also involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBomy acted as a companion, with Phase 5 participants petting, naming, and dressing it up for Christmas.
“Theme three highlighted that Bomy acted as a companion, with participants petting it, naming it, and dressing it up for Christmas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome Phase 5 participants expected future users to adapt to new technologies more quickly because they will have grown up using them.
“Some expected that future users would be able to adapt to new technologies more quickly, given that they will have grown up with using them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenRetirement villages that supported the research and many experts were involved across multiple phases, including data collection in Phase 4.
“The retirement villages that supported the research, and many of the experts were involved across multiple phases, including data collection in Phase 4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataExperts suggested improvements including touching rather than dragging items and more positive reinforcements for correct answers.
“The experts suggested improvements that included touching rather dragging items across the screen, and the games giving more positive reinforcements when participants gave the right answers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPhase 6 participants observed slight improvements in their own cognition.
“They had observed slight improvements in their own cognition:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 6 participants reported the robot was easy to use and possibly useful in improving cognitive functioning.
“Participants reported that the robot was easy to use and possibly useful in improving cognitive functioning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 5 participants reported the reminders were useful for their health-related needs and expected them to be especially beneficial for those with lower cognitive functioning.
“Participants reported that they were useful for their various health-related needs and expected them to be especially beneficial for those with lower levels of cognitive functioning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPhase 6 participants identified possible technical developments including using contrasting color schemes to accommodate visual impairment such as macular degeneration.
“However, some possible technical developments were identified, including using contrasting color schemes to accommodate visual impairment (e.g., macular degeneration):”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe early phases of the project involved participants in scenario design, interface, and applications of the robot, while later phases tested how it could be used in context and adapted to health needs in collaboration with users.
“Instead, the early phases of our project involved participants in the scenario design, interface, and applications of the robot, while later phases tested how it could be used in context and adapted to health needs in collaboration with users (e.g., by introducing personalized reminders).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome Phase 5 participants predicted that lack of digital confidence and experience could create barriers to using Bomy.
“This was predicted to possibly create barriers to using Bomy:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPhase 5 participants suggested that more technical support be provided on an ongoing basis.
“Overall, they suggested that more technical support be provided and that this should be offered on an ongoing basis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataPhase 5 participants suggested personalized tasks such as cooking help and greater emphasis on safety.
“Some suggested personalized tasks, such as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome Phase 5 participants raised concerns about a lack of digital confidence and experience.
“In theme four, some participants raised concerns about a lack of digital confidence and experience:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 6 participants suggested that imagery and specific language should reflect each user's culture; New Zealand participants desired a New Zealand accent and British participants desired a British accent.
“Participants also suggested that the imagery and specific language should also reflect that from each user's culture.For example, those from New Zealand desired a New Zealand accent, while British participants desired a British accent:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 5 participants suggested making some cognitive games more stimulating and the robot's voice more human-like.
“Suggestions included making some of the cognitive games more stimulating and making the robots voice more human-like.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome Phase 5 participants were more confident that most people would not find Bomy difficult to use.
“Others were more confident, e.g.,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants with a range of health issues were included and perceived the robot as useful.
“However, participants with a range of health issues were included, and perceived the robot as useful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 5 participants reported technical issues for mass use: loud charger, game blocks sometimes not responding, and screen sometimes lagging.
“Participants also suggested that for mass use, some technical issues require resolving, such as the loudness of the charger, the game blocks sometimes not responding and the screen sometimes lagging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhase 5 participants reported the robot was fun and useful to use.
“They were reported to be fun and useful to use:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOver multiple phases, older adults, relatives, and experts contributed vital ideas and feedback about appropriate robot functions and highlighted potential pitfalls.
“Over multiple phases, the older adults, relatives, and experts contributed vital ideas and feedback about appropriate robot functions and highlighted potential pitfalls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPartners in the project previously tested similar games in Korea and found them to be acceptable and to have health benefits.
“Partners in the project previously tested similar games in Korea and found them to be acceptable and to have health benefits [42].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationCognitive functioning was determined prior to enrollment, using the Mini Mental State Examination.
“Cognitive functioning was determined prior to enrollment, using the Mini Mental State Examination [46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCognitive abilities decline with age, and monotonic age-related cognitive decline has been reported from between 20 and 75 years of age.
“Salthouse [48] supports this, stating that monotonic age-related cognitive decline has been reported from between 20 and 75 years of age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParticipatory design is crucial for technology adoption and in ensuring that older adults can and want to continue to use technologies, including robots.
“Participatory design is crucial for technology adoption and in ensuring that older adults can and want to continue to use technologies [32], including robots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe Geriatric Depression Scale, Geriatric Anxiety Scale, and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery were administered at baseline and follow-up to assess for changes in mood and cognitive functioning.
“The Geriatric Depression Scale [49], Geriatric Anxiety Scale [50], and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery [51] were administered at baseline and follow-up to assess for changes in mood and cognitive functioning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [49]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThemes in Phase 5 were generated during an in-person meeting and discussed until consensus was met.
“Themes were generated during an in-person meeting and discussed until consensus was met.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe use of video scenarios was useful to speed up the process of testing and development with experts in aged care and older adults, to gain user feedback before the next phase.
“The use of video scenarios was also useful to speed up the process of testing and development with experts in aged care and older adults, to gain user feedback before the next phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis level of participation is uncommon, as few developers involve older adults in the design process and little is known about their in-depth opinions of care robots.
“However, this level of participation is uncommon, as few developers involve older adults in the design process and little is known about their in-depth opinions of care robots, as current research primarily focuses on technical development and one-off use [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe same inductive analysis approach as in Phase 2 was conducted, but with three independent researchers in Phase 3.
“The same inductive analysis approach as in Phase 2 was conducted, but with three independent researchers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRobots need to be evaluated in the settings they are developed for and during long-term use.
“Importantly, robots need to be evaluated in the settings they are developed for and during long-term use, as this is essential to encountering real-world challenges [21][22][23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAssistive technologies and cognitive stimulation activities have been found to promote independent living and to help protect against age-related cognitive decline.
“Assistive technologies (also called gerontechnologies) and cognitive stimulation activities (e.g., games) have been found to promote independent living and to help protect against age-related cognitive decline [6].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSaturation was reached after the eighth interview in Phase 6.
“Saturation was reached after the eighth interview.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOnly one potential participant was excluded, due to scores indicating severe impairment.
“Only one potential participant was excluded, due to scores indicating severe impairment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany researchers only provide users with a single session to test a robot or ask participants to imagine using it, after seeing it.
“However, a review of social robotics found that many researchers only provide users with a single session to test a robot or ask participants to imagine using it, after seeing it [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee approved the studies.
“The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee approved the studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationOngoing participatory and user-centered design of robotic technologies with intended users and experts is vital for developing effective, useful, acceptable, and user-friendly products.
“Ongoing participatory and user-centered design of robotic technologies with intended users and experts is also vital for developing effective, useful, acceptable, and user-friendly products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [24]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationInterviews in Phase 5 were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically by two researchers, using an inductive approach that aligned with the established Braun and Clarke method.
“Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically by two researchers, using an inductive approach that aligned with the established Braun and Clarke method [47].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncluding patients as well as clinicians resulted in a gamified robotic system for post-stroke long-term rehabilitation that was motivating, engaging, and met the needs of the end users.
“Polak et al. [33] found that including patients as well as clinicians resulted in a gamified robotic system for post-stroke long-term rehabilitation that was motivating, engaging, and met the needs of the end users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe specific methods were determined iteratively, depending on the findings from previous phases.
“As is consistent with a participatory design approach [24,30], the specific methods were determined iteratively, depending on the findings from previous phases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [24]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale was used to determine cognitive function at screening.
“At screening, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale was used to determine cognitive function [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataTwo researchers independently read the transcripts and extracted emergent themes in Phase 2.
“Two researchers independently read the transcripts and extracted emergent themes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe participatory process promoted collective ownership and avoided a deficit-framing approach, focusing on the robot as a tool to help older adults without compromising their autonomy.
“Third, the participatory process promoted collective ownership and avoided a deficit-framing approach [26,31], whereby the robotic product was focused on as a tool that could be used to help older adults, without compromising their autonomy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThree robots (Bomy 1, Bomy, and Silbot) were used in the project, which strengthened the study.
“Importantly, three robots (Bomy 1, Bomy, and Silbot) were used in the project, which strengthened the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe small sample sizes in some phases must be acknowledged.
“The small sample sizes in some of the phases must be acknowledged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSingle-use or imagined-use research may bias results, as technology may not be reliable if used long-term.
“This may bias results, as the technology may not be reliable if used long-term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe project highlights the importance of ongoing stakeholder participation, product refinement and long-term testing robotics in the environments for which they have been developed.
“This project highlights the importance of ongoing stakeholder participation, product refinement and long-term testing robotics in the environments for which they have been developed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenUnsupervised autonomous use of the robots in later phases may have eliminated potential social desirability bias and encouraged more genuine feedback on human-robot interaction.
“Unsupervised autonomous use of the robots in later phases may have also eliminated potential social desirability bias and encouraged more genuine feedback on human-robot interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Phase 4 evaluation produced limited results and mixed feedback.
“This resulted in limited results and mixed feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis ensured that the functions of the robot would meet their needs and be acceptable and user-friendly.
“This ensured that the functions of the robot would meet their needs and be acceptable and user-friendly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sample sizes were appropriate for qualitative research and feasibility studies, but small for randomized trials.
“The sample sizes were appropriate for qualitative research and feasibility studies, but small for randomized trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe multi-methods approach in this project meant that data were both reliable (due to randomization) and rich (due to qualitative interviews).
“The multi-methods approach in this project meant that data were both reliable (i.e., due to randomization) and rich (due to qualitative interviews).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningMember checking gave participants the opportunity to contribute more information or validate that the information they provided during interviews was correct.
“This gave our participants the opportunity to contribute more information or to validate that the information they had provided during their interviews was correct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOverall, the robot shows potential in elderly care, especially in providing reminders for medication, health and wellbeing, and delivering cognitively stimulating games.
“Overall, the robot shows potential in elderly care, especially in providing reminders for medication, health and wellbeing, and delivering cognitively stimulating games.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIssues identified in the earlier version were not reported by Phase 6 participants, indicating that they had been resolved.
“Issues identified in the earlier version were not reported by these participants, highlighting that they had been resolved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe blocks needed to be fixed by Robocare before they could be evaluated.
“Likewise, the blocks needed to be fixed by Robocare, to be able to evaluate them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIndividuals with mild cognitive impairments may respond better to shorter sessions where they are observed interacting with a robot, rather than long in-depth interviews about their interaction.
“For example, individuals with mild cognitive impairments may respond better to shorter sessions where they are observed interacting with a robot, rather than long in-depth interviews about their interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe project exemplifies how participatory design might be employed in a multi-phase project.
“This project exemplifies how participatory design might be employed in a multi-phase project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMoharana et al. support that informal caregivers are often invisible within the design space.
“Moharana et al. [62] support this in their work, stating that informal caregivers are often invisible within the design space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy centralizing older adults and experts in various multi-methods studies, the design of the robot was user-friendly and the functions were useful.
“By centralizing older adults and experts in various multi-methods studies, the design of the robot was user-friendly and the functions were useful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe project highlights the importance of stakeholder involvement when developing robots for older adults.
“This international and multi-phase project highlights the importance of stakeholder involvement when developing robots for older adults.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimilar methods were used and recommended by Ostrowski et al.
“Similar methods were used and recommended by Ostrowski et al. [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough both robots were perceived as potentially useful, they require further refinement to ensure usability and reliability, including resolving technical issues associated with long-term use.
“Although both robots were perceived to be potentially useful, they require some further refinement to ensure that they are usable and reliable, including resolving the technical issues associated with long-term use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEven small samples can provide important information in robotic studies, as previous research has shown that major technical issues in robots were identified in a sample of five participants.
“Even small samples can provide important information in robotic studies, as previous research has shown that major technical issues in robots were identified in a sample of five participants [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParticipatory design requires contextual consideration and works best when products are designed and evaluated in the environments where end users spend their time.
“As emphasized in literature, participatory design requires contextual consideration, and works best when products are designed and evaluated in the environments where end users spend their time [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious research in human-robot interaction tends to consist of single use or often requires participants to imagine using the robot.
“Previous research in human-robot interaction tends to consist of single use, [10,11,22,43,[58][59][60] or often requires participants to imagine using the robot [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10,11,22,43,[58][59][60]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThis ensured intercoder reliability and resulted in findings being interpreted accurately.
“This ensured intercoder reliability and resulted in findings being interpreted accurately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPreviously developed technologies for older adults rely on developers and engineers imagining the health needs of older adults and often begin by creating a product and then searching for a problem for it to solve.
“This differs from previously developed technologies for older adults, which rely on developers and engineers imagining the health needs of older adults [20,57] and often begins by creating a product and then searching for a problem for it to solve [40].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenInvolvement of a range of key stakeholders and testing in multiple retirement villages may have improved the transferability of the robot.
“Lastly, the involvement of a range of key stakeholders and testing in multiple retirement villages may have improved the transferability of the robot.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncluding caregivers of older adults helped them to understand the role that robots could play at each stage of dementia.
“They found that including caregivers of older adults helped them to understand the role that robots could play at each stage of dementia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExperts, relatives, carers and older adults were empowered to collaborate on a project that may benefit them in the future, with a practical and clearly defined focus.
“Additionally, experts, relatives, carers and older adults were empowered to collaborate on a project that may benefit them in the future, with a practical and clearly defined focus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There are currently no effective pharmacological treatments for dementia.
“There are currently no effective pharmacological treatments for dementia.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nonpharmacological interventions are important for dementia.
“Therefore, nonpharmacological interventions are important.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The robot games intervention was expected to help slow cognitive decline in healthy older adults.
“Healthy older adults were recruited because cognitive abilities decline with age, and the robot games intervention was expected to help slow this decline, with important consequences for independent living.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Older adults' health needs are not homogenous.
“Additionally, as older adults' health needs are not homogenous, future design work should include older adults with a wider range of health needs, such as severe mobility, vision and hearing impairments, as well as those with varying levels of cognitive decline.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most prior HRI participatory design studies with older adults do not include the actual robot, relying instead on video demonstrations, storyboard images, or other images of robots.
“Most of these studies do not include the actual robot, and they instead rely on video demonstrations [6, 16], storyboard images showing what a robot may do [5], or other images of robots [9].”
From Situated Participatory Design: A Method for In Situ Design of Robotic Interaction with Older Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation to this paper is attached to “other images of robots” as an alternative to including an actual robot. Although §4.2 mentions looking at robot images as a possible design method, §2.5 reports that participants used the actual robot in their homes for up to a week. This study therefore does not fit the cited example of relying on images instead of a robot; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Average reminder count is impossible for six participants
MinorEach of the six participants chose a whole-number count of reminders. No integer total divided by six rounds to 3.6 reminders per person to one decimal place.
“Six older adults (four females, two males) volunteered to use the Bomy daily-care robot in their homes for up to one week.”
“chose to have an average of 3.6 reminders each (range 2 to 5).”
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553 · see citing works
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 · Cited by 10,865 · see citing works
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312 · see citing works
(2005) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Rebok, G. W., Ball, K., Guey, L. T., Jones, R. N., Kim, H., King, J. W., Marsiske, M., Morris, J. N., Tennstedt, S. L., Unverzagt, F. W., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.12607 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Consequences of Age-Related Cognitive Declines
Salthouse, T. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100328 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Jekel, K., Damian, M., Wattmo, C., Hausner, L., Bullock, R., Connelly, P. J., Dubois, B., Eriksdotter, M., Ewers, M., Graessel, E., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-015-0099-0 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Systematic Review into Effects and Effectiveness
Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G. J., Jonker, P., & de Witte, L. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
From user-centered to participatory design approaches
Sanders, E. (2002) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203301302-8 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Co-creation and the new landscapes of design
Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. J. (2016) · doi:10.5040/9781474282932.0011 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., & Broadbent, E. (2014) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom user-centered to participatory design approaches
Sanders, E. (2002) · Contemporary Trends Institute series · doi:10.1201/9780203301302.ch1 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Social Engagement and Cognitive Function in Old Age
Krueger, K. R., Wilson, R. S., Kamenetsky, J. M., Barnes, L. L., Bienias, J. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2009) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610730802545028 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot
Scassellati, B. M., Boccanfuso, L., Huang, C., Mademtzi, M., Qin, M., Salomons, N., Ventola, P. E., & Shic, F. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
Wang, S., Bolling, K., Mao, W., Reichstadt, J., Jeste, D., Kim, H.-C., & Nebeker, C. (2019) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare7020060 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Segal, D. L., June, A., Payne, M., Coolidge, F. L., & Yochim, B. (2010) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.002 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Lee, H. R., Šabanović, S., Chang, W.-L., Nagata, S., Piatt, J., Bennett, C., & Hakken, D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020237 · Cited by 212 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[35] also included older adults with depression and their therapists in their design process of a social robot.”
BackgroundParticipatory Design in Gerontechnology: A Systematic Literature Review
Merkel, S., & Kucharski, A. (2019) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny034 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Graf, B., Reiser, U., Hagele, M., Mauz, K., & Klein, P. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts · doi:10.1109/arso.2009.5587059 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Functional Disability in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lindbergh, C. A., Dishman, R. K., & Miller, L. S. (2016) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9321-5 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
(2008) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/ijhcqa.2008.06221aae.002 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Clare, R., King, V. G., Wirenfeldt, M., & Vinters, H. V. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.22392 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Vandemeulebroucke, T., de Casterlé, B. D., & Gastmans, C. (2018) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions
Mann, J. A., MacDonald, B. A., Kuo, I.-H., Li, X., & Broadbent, E. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.029 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationClabaugh, C., Mahajan, K., Jain, S., Pakkar, R., Becerra, D., Shi, Z., Deng, E., Lee, R., Ragusa, G., & Matarić, M. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2019.00110 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Klímová, B., Vališ, M., & Kuča, K. (2017) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s132963 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B. A., & Broadbent, E. (2013) · Australian Journal on Ageing · doi:10.1111/ajag.12099 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationENRICHME: Perception and Interaction of an Assistive Robot for the Elderly at Home
Coşar, S., Fernández, M. F., Agrigoroaie, R., Pages, J., Ferland, F., Zhao, F., Yue, S., Bellotto, N., & Tapus, A. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00614-y · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Broadbent, E., Garrett, J., Jepsen, N., Li Ogilvie, V., Ahn, H. S., Robinson, H., Peri, K., Kerse, N., Rouse, P., Pillai, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8640 · Cited by 119 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some research has explored long-term use in the ‘wild’ including robots that support dieting interventions [14], improve social skills and provide developmental support to children with autism spectrum disorder [15, 16], assist therapy for cardiac rehabilitation [17], mimic animal-assisted therapy [18], and support pa…”
BackgroundSelf-citation(2017) · doi:10.2196/jmir.v20i2.8640 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationLaw, M., Sutherland, C., Ahn, H. S., MacDonald, B. A., Peri, K., Johanson, D. L., Vajsakovic, D.-S., Kerse, N., & Broadbent, E. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031937 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationRobots for Joy, Robots for Sorrow: Community Based Robot Design for Dementia Caregivers
Moharana, S., Panduro, A. E., Lee, H. R., & Riek, L. D. (2019) · 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673206 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Kim, G. H., Jeon, S., Im, K., Kwon, H., Lee, B. H., Kim, G. Y., Jeong, H., Han, N. E., Seo, S. W., Cho, H., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123251 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationLong-Term Co-Design Guidelines: Empowering Older Adults as Co-Designers of Social Robots
Ostrowski, A. K., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2021) · 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) · doi:10.1109/ro-man50785.2021.9515559 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Effectiveness of a social robot, “Paro,” in a VA long-term care setting.
Lane, G. W., Noronha, D. O., Rivera, A. M., Craig, K., Yee, C., Mills, B. M., & Villanueva, E. (2016) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000080 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Evaluation of a companion robot based on field tests with single older adults in their homes
Zsiga, K., Tóth, A., Pilissy, T., Péter, O., Dénes, Z., & Fazekas, G. (2018) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1322158 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Results of Field Trials with a Mobile Service Robot for Older Adults in 16 Private Households
Bajones, M., Fischinger, D., Weiss, A., de la Puente, P., Wolf, D., Vincze, M., Körtner, T., Weninger, M., Papoutsakis, K. E., Michel, D., et al. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3368554 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Loss of chromatic sensitivity in AMD and diabetes: a comparative study
O’Neill‐Biba, M., Sivaprasad, S., Rodriguez‐Carmona, M., Wolf, J. E., & Barbur, J. L. (2010) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00775.x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Physical and affective interaction between human and mental commit robot
Shibata, T., & Tanie, K. (2002) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/robot.2001.933010 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Gasteiger, N., Ahn, H. S., Fok, C., Lim, J., Christopher, L., MacDonald, B. A., Kim, G. H., & Broadbent, E. (2021) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2021.1877210 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationRobotics to Enable Older Adults to Remain Living at Home
Pearce, A. J., Adair, B., Miller, K., Ozanne, E., Said, C. M., Santamaria, N., & Morris, M. E. (2012) · Journal of Aging Research · doi:10.1155/2012/538169 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Broadbent, E., Peri, K., Kerse, N., Jayawardena, C., Kuo, I., Datta, C., & MacDonald, B. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_7 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationA Social Robot Learning to Facilitate an Assistive Group-Based Activity from Non-expert Caregivers
Louie, W.-Y. G., & Nejat, G. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00621-4 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Darragh, M., Ahn, H. S., MacDonald, B. A., Liang, A., Peri, K., Kerse, N. M., & Broadbent, E. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.08.019 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationHealthcare Robots in Homes of Rural Older Adults
Orejana, J. R., MacDonald, B. A., Ahn, H. S., Peri, K., & Broadbent, E. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_51 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationRobot-Delivered Cognitive Stimulation Games for Older Adults
Gasteiger, N., Ahn, H. S., Gasteiger, C., Lee, C., Lim, J., Fok, C., MacDonald, B. A., Kim, G. H., & Broadbent, E. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3451882 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationFocusing on the Human: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Ageing and Technology
Beimborn, M., Kadi, S., Köberer, N., Mühleck, M., & Spindler, M. (2016) · Science studies · doi:10.14361/9783839429570-015 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Focusing on the Human: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Ageing and Technology
Beimborn, M. F., Kadi, S., Köberer, N., et al. (2016) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839429570-015 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
PARO’s Stress-Reduction Potential for Older Adults
McGlynn, S. A., Geiskkovitch, D. Y., Mitzner, T., & Rogers, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601411 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Exploration of a Robot-based Adaptive Cognitive Stimulation System for the Elderly
Ros, R., & Espona, M. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3371382.3378322 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- T. Belpaeme and C. Cifuentes. 2020. Using a personalised socially assistive robot for cardiac rehabilitation: A long-term case study. In 29th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2020.
- A. Abrams, L. Platte, and A. Rosenthal-von der Putten. 2020. Field observation: Interactions between pedestrians and a delivery robot. In IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN’20).
- V. Carr, D. Sangiorgi, M. Buscher, R. Cooper, and S. Junginger. 2009. Clinicians as service designers? Reflections on current transformation in the UK health services. In First Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation. Oslo, Norway, 2009.
- Y. Rogers J. Paay M. Brereton K. Vaisutis G. Marsden F. Vetere and P. o. t. n. A. A. C. o. H. F. i. c. s. C. p. N. Y. A. P. d. (Eds.). Never too old: Engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. 3913–3922.
- R. Polak and S. Tzedek. 2020. Social robot for rehabilitation: Expert clinicians and post-stroke patients' evaluation following a long-term intervention. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 151–160.
- E. Broadbent, H. Ahn, N. Kerse, K. Peri, C. Sutherland, M. Law, B. MacDonald, and G. Kim. 2018. Homecare robots for early stage dementia. In TechMindSociety 2018. APAScience’18: Technology, Mind, and Society. Washington DC, USA, 2018.
- M. Law, H. Ahn, B. MacDonald, D. Vasjakovic, J. Lim, M. Lee, C. Sutherland, K. Peri, N. Kerse, and E. Broadbent. 2019. User testing of cognitive training games for people with mild cognitive impairment: Design implications. Social Robotics. ICSR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, M. Salichs (ed.). Springer: Cham.
- J. Sheikh and J. Yesavage. 1986. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin. Gerontol. 5, 1 of 2 (1986), 165–173.
- Cambridge Cognition. “CANTAB ” https://www.cambridgecognition.com/cantab/.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Situated Participatory Design: A Method for In Situ Design of Robotic Interaction with Older Adults
Stegner, L., Senft, E., & Mutlu, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580893 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Irfan, B., Kuoppamäki, S., Hosseini, A., & Skantze, G. (2025) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-025-10190-y · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“…2022), surveys and interviews (Caleb-Solly et al., 2014; Winkle et al., 2018; Ostrowski et al., 2019; Ostrowski et al., 2021; Søraa et al., 2022; Gasteiger et al., 2022), concept generation and design activities (e.g., storyboards (Bedaf et al., 2019; Björ-ling & Rose, 2019), card sorting…”
InfluentialDesigning Conversational AI for Aging: A Systematic Review of Older Adults' Perceptions and Needs
Huang, Y.-H., Zhou, Q., & Piper, A. M. (2025) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713578 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Amirova, A., Fteropoulli, T., Ahmed, N., Cowie, M., & Leibo, J. Z. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300024 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“User-centered design prioritizes making sure products align with user needs and are accessible to them [86].”
Robotics in Elderly Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of 20 Recent European Research Projects
Khaksar, W., Saplacan, D., Bygrave, L. A., & Tørresen, J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711936 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Elderly people or other users, such as formal and informal caregivers, who will be utilizing these care robots should be seen as the main stakeholders in a user-centered design or PD [146, 147] process, rather than part of isolated experiments.”
The Role of Conversational AI in Ageing and Dementia Care at Home: A Participatory Study
Lima, M. R. D., Horrocks, S., Daniels, S., Lamptey, M., Harrison, M., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309459 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“…have used participatory methods to explore the use of SAR to support older adults with age-related health needs and mild cognitive impairment [15], [26], and carers of PLWD [27], [28] in various contexts, including: social engagement [29], mental health support [30], rehabilitation [31], physical…”
MethodPpali, S., Cheung, E. T. H., Covaci, A., She, W. J., & Ang, C. S. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714101 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Although including caregivers and family members in the design process has been shown to enhance practical and emotional outcomes [37], current research often lacks systematic approaches for engaging these stakeholders meaningfully and consistently.”
Hsu, L.-J., Bays, J. K., Tsui, K. M., & Šabanović, S. (2023) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3595987 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“In order to minimize the challenges for PLwD when using co-design methods, researchers may include their care partners and other stakeholders in the co-design process [17, 20, 40].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteractive Serious Games for Cognitive Training of Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Canapa, G., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2025.3532307 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) is a digital battery of activities for assessing different cognitive abilities [41], [58], [110].”
InfluentialA Social Robot in Home Care: Acceptability and Utility Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Zhao, I. Y., Leung, A. Y. M., Huang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igaf019 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…findings are consistent with previous studies that highlight the potential of humanoid social robots to improve the quality of life and social interactions of older adults (Leng et al., 2019); as well as to support family caregivers in managing their caregiving burdens (Gasteiger et al., 2022).”
Elsheikh, A., Al‐Thani, D., & Othman, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1626471 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Salomé, S., du Bousquet, L., & Monfort, E. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100606 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
On the relevance of Maslow's need theory in the age of artificial intelligence
Montag, C., Riazi, A. M., Mikros, G. K., Becker, B., & Ali, R. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124222 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sandoval, D. C., Tentori, M. E., & Favela, J. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3700889 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“While not properly presented as a design framework, Gasteiger et al. [25] present the methods used in the participatory design and evaluation of an SAR for mood stabilization and cognitive improvement of older adults.”
Home Integration of Conversational Robots to Enhance Ageing and Dementia Care
Lima, M. R. D. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610978.3638378 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“En-gaging stakeholders in the scoping of conversational robots is key to designing meaningful interactions that meet the changing needs of target users [13, 24].”
BackgroundAshwini, B., Ghoshal, A., Suri, V. R., Achary, K., & Shukla, J. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642836 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Additionally, PD has demonstrated effectiveness in HRI, contributing to the creation of robots for depression management and mood stabilisation [60].”
Salvadorinho, J. P., Pintor, P., Bastos, T., & Teixeira, L. C. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management · doi:10.3926/jiem.6314 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Felber, N. A., Lipworth, W. L., Tian, Y. J., Duong, V., & Wangmo, T. (2025) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-025-00541-4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Other scholars have also argued for greater collaboration between end users and designers (Berridge et al., 2021; Gasteiger et al., 2022b; Ong et al., 2024; Ostrowski et al., 2021) The approach we suggest therefore comes at an opportune moment for fostering more effective innovation in AgeTech.”
InfluentialRehm, M., & Krummheuer, A. L. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1369438 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Co-design of Robotic Technology with Care Home Residents and Care Workers
Frijns, H. A., Vetter, R., Hirschmanner, M., Grabler, R., Vogel, L., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2024) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3652037.3652070 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Liberman-Pincu, E., van Grondelle, E. D., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2024) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2024.2435606 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In Human-Robot Interaction studies, participatory design processes were applied to extract user needs and identify the essential robotic characteristics, e.g. (Gasteiger et al. 2022; Pnevmatikos, Christodoulou, and Fachantidis 2022; Rogers, Kadylak, and Bayles 2022).”
Understanding Participatory Design in Health and Wellness Technologies for Older Adults
Quidato, M., & Suarez, M. T. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92707-2_9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Liberman-Pincu, E., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2025) · Advanced Design Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijadr.2025.04.001 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Datey, I., Soper, H., Hossain, K., Louie, W.-Y. G., & Zytko, D. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309539 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“PD has gained considerable traction in HRI [25]-[31],[36], [48], [49] with a diverse range of stakeholders involved in robot design such as children [49], the elderly [25], [48], [36], and people with disabilities [27], [28], [30], [31].”
BackgroundOhneberg, C., Stöbich, N., & Eberl, I. (2025) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01289-4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Addressing these indi - vidual factors can support the development, application, and long-term integration of robotic systems in diverse care settings [ 38, 40 ].”
Oliva, D., Olszewski, A., Sadeghi, S., Dantu, K., & Feil-Seifer, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1646880 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Making Robots Usable”: Empowering Care Professionals to Customize Social Robots in Care
Manavi, M., Carros, F., Schwaninger, I., Paluch, R., Randall, D. W., Krueger, M., Tufan, I., Wieching, R., Tolmie, P., Mueller, C., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01238-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Designing a Multimodal Robot Pet for Older Adults by Young Adults
Alhouli, S. Y., Almania, N. A., Ahmad, M., & Sahoo, D. R. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3720083 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Development and evaluation of online medication support tools for older people: a systematic review
Afolabi, T. E., Langford, A. V., Hilmer, S. N., Etherton‐Beer, C., Das, A., Winardi, K., Sawan, M. J., & O’Donnell, L. K. (2025) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf303 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Social Robots in Elderly Care
Hermann, J., Oktay, S., Lisetschko, A., & Doğangün, A. (2023) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3638380.3638412 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ageism, Power, and Gaps: Co-Designing Robots with Older Adults
Mannheim, I., Edan, Y., Alon, R., Peine, A., & Nimrod, G. (2025) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01325-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Examining Technology Perspectives of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Scoping Review
Schmidt, S. B., Isbel, S. T., John, B. M., Subramanian, R., & D'Cunha, N. M. (2025) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/78229 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wolffgramm, M. R., Corporaal, S., & Groen, A. J. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1442319 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Dobrosovestnova, A., Vetter, R., & Weiss, A. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731405 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Participatory design (PD) is an approach that is well established both in the HCI and HRI (e.g.,[31], [32]).”
BackgroundCultural Feasibility of Conversational Robots for Dementia Care in India: Participatory Design Study
Lima, M. R. D., Srinivasan, N., Daniels, S., Vaitheswaran, S., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2025) · Journal of Participatory Medicine · doi:10.2196/80457 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The need for personalization as a key feature, as voiced by stakeholders, is aligned with previous studies [30,32].”
Karaosmanoglu, E., Rozendaal, M. C., Vallery, H., & Cramm, J. M. (2026) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-026-01391-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Furthermore, the peer-review standards of conference publications can vary widely, which raises concerns early in the design process [ 120] and facilitates acceptance and adoption [ 121].”
Appearance Matters: Insights from Co-Design and Evaluation of Social Assistive Robots
Pimminger, S., Kurschl, W., Schönböck, J., & Zwettler, G. A. (2025) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3733155.3733203 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Several research projects and research items emphasize the importance of involving stake-holders in robot design and evaluating their effectiveness in real-life scenarios [19].”
Hung, L., Chen, I., Wong, J., et al. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251365066 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“18 To reduce social desirability bias, Gasteiger et al. 5 recommended unsupervised and voluntary interactions with robots, allowing participants to engage naturally without external in fl uence.”
InfluentialHow Emotional Dances with Social Robots Influence Group HRI for Older Adults
Li, Y., Liang, N., & Nejat, G. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3773894 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Espinal, J. D. G., Fernandez, M., Balbuena, J., Arroyo, D., Dávila, M., & Arce, D. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3649801 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Thiel, K., Schulz, D., Lingl, L., Unbehaun, D., & Wulf, V. (2026) · i-com · doi:10.1515/icom-2025-0041 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“45,46 Furthermore, it contributes to understanding the fit between technology and the work environment from both the users’ and researchers’ perspectives.”
Robots for Older Adults: A Scoping Review
Olatunji, S., Tsai, Y.-L., Gowrishankar, S. A., Bayles, M. A., & Rogers, W. A. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3799977 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…al.[182];Fitteret al.[66];Rossiet al.[190]; Palestra et al. [248]; Fernández-Rodicio et al. [61]; Coşar et al. [45]; Oh et al. [165]; Fan et al. [55]; Gasteiger et al. [72]; Abdollahi et al. [1]; Lin et al. [129]; Nault et al. [159]; Nelson et al. [160]; Castellano et al. [35] G5.”
Pröbsting, J. S., Rießenberger, K. A., & Fischer, F. (2026) · BMC Digital Health · doi:10.1186/s44247-026-00254-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Braune, K., Schaaf, T., Balzer, F., Bershtein, D. I., Broderick, A., Çelik, P., Flügge, T. V., Kim, K. K., Lahmann, N., Lindeman, D. A., et al. (2026) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2026.103217 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Integration of Blockchain with Last Mile Delivery Robots Toward Marketing Innovations
Esmaeilian, B., & Behdad, S. (2024) · Financial innovation and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49515-1_9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bridging Gaps in Design Thinking: Inclusive Guidelines for Intellectual Disabilities
Corsetti, B., Moreno, L. D. L. R., & Hervás, R. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2527848 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“PD has supported collaboration and enhanced social conversation skills, notably for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (Parsons et al., 2011) and in the testing of health robots for older adults with mild intellectual impairments (Gasteiger et al., 2022).”
AI and Robotics in Elderly Personal Assistance
Udayan, J. D., & Subramaniam, U. (2025) · doi:10.1002/9781394275397.ch4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Gadahad, P. R., Joshi, A. N., & D’Souza, N. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80829-6_8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, L., & Scifleet, P. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3720072
Seif, R., Veisi, O., Wieching, R., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1145/3726986.3727033
Ethical Issues in AI-Enhanced Assistive Technologies
Hasan, H. E., Chanina, S. Z., & Khaleel, M. F. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_517-1
Robot-Mediated gesture-based memory game for older adult psychophysical stimulation
Pozzi, L., Braghin, F., & Gandolla, M. (2025) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros60139.2025.11247306
“Additionally, several SARs have been tested in relevant environments to deliver cognitive stimulation, ranging from serious games [6] to interventions aimed at combating decline in Alzheimer’s disease patients [7].”
Editorial: Interactive robots for healthcare and participation
Schneider, S., Silvera‐Tawil, D., Vollmer, A.-L., & Fey, A. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1750188
Muñoz, J. E., Saleh, S., & Ramirez, N. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2398-6_15
Designing A Dietary Management App Aimed at Preventing Cognitive Decline
Iki, H., Takabayash, J., Ogawa, T., Du, Y., & Taki, Y. (2025) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/cyberscitech68397.2025.00119
“Participatory design is a method enabling development tailored to older adults ’ lifestyles and operational proficiency, shown to contribute to improved UX and acceptance [15, 31].”
Li, P., Yang, C., Luo, C., Yuan, R., & He, Y. D. (2026) · Research in Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/19404921-20260126-01
A technological leap in workplace engagement for industry 5.0: Introducing BoosToRaise
Salvadorinho, J. P., Ferreira, C., & Teixeira, L. C. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103276
Exploring the Entertainment Potential of Personalised LLM-Based Serious Games with Humanoid Robots
Canapa, G., Catricalà, B., Manca, M., et al. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742414.3795099
Wang, Y., Zhang, W., & Lee, H. R. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3757279.3785624
“Participatory design has already been adopted in HRI communities as one of the main design methods, and mutual learn ing between researchers and participants is a central component [8, 9, 14, 15, 36, 54, 55, 73, 73].”
Quidato, M., Suarez, M. T., & Ebardo, R. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2026.1795304
“…physical activity, whereas repetitive or socially complex tasks may require additional motivational strategies to sustain participation, belonging, and learning (Zapata-Restrepo et al., 2025; Tunc et al., 2025; Mois et al., 2023; Ostrowski et al., 2024; Trinh et al., 2024; Gasteiger et al., 2022).”
Ahmadi, M., Unbehaun, D., Carros, F., Wieching, R., Tolmie, P., & Wulf, V. (2026) · i-com · doi:10.1515/icom-2025-0052
“14 Incorporating this broader set of stakeholders may be ben-eficial to our understanding of some of the complexities of the study context.”
Barbosa, P. P., Ferreira, F. F. M., Teixeira, J., & Mendes, G. H. D. S. (2026) · Journal of Social Impact in Business Research · doi:10.1108/jsibr-10-2025-0124
Equity-by-design for socially assistive robots as digital health tools
Kachouie, R., & Barton, B. (2026) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocag105
First Experiences with a Personalised LLM-based Serious Game Deployed Through a Humanoid Robot
Canapa, G., Paternò, F., & Zedda, E. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30405-6_2
Quidato, M., & Suarez, M. T. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30421-6_23
Designanforderungen für wertorientierte soziale Roboter in der Altenpflege
Vonschallen, S., Hitz, N., Zhong, V. J., & Schmiedel, T. (2026) · Edition HMD · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-51795-3_21
Smart Homes, Safety, Autonomy, and Privacy in Ageing in Place
Lin, G., & Haron, S. H. B. (2026) · International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare · doi:10.4018/ijrqeh.420860
Hwang, I. T., Kim, G., & Kwag, B. C. (2026) · Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering · doi:10.1080/13467581.2026.2722567
Self-citationLin, Z., & Meng, J. (2026) · International Journal of Art & Design Education · doi:10.1111/jade.70046
Preserving Person‐Centred Fundamental Care in Human‐ AI Collaboration: A Scoping Review
Kim, D., Son, Y. J., Kim, B., Lim, B., & Kim, S. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70757
Piras, R., Bordini, S., Simi, R. K., Consolo, I., Esposito, V., Cavaggion, C., Feder, M., Fossati, M., Grioli, G., Bicchi, A., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2026.1944029
Personalizing Older Adults’ Cognitive Training Robot Games with LLM Support
Canapa, G., Catricalà, B., Manca, M., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., & Zedda, E. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2731297
Mendoza, L., Cerezo, E., Matinero, L., & Baldassarri, S. (2026) · Revista de la Asociación Interacción Persona Ordenador (AIPO) · doi:10.65234/interaccion.152
Where Participation Happens: Mapping Contemporary Sociotechnical Settings
Colley, J., Joshi, S. G., van den Biggelaar, A., et al. (2026) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3821402.3830202
- Authors
- Gasteiger, N., Ahn, H. S., Lee, C., Lim, J., MacDonald, B. A., Kim, G. H., & Broadbent, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Ewha Womans University (KR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
- Published
- 2022-09-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 2573-9522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280531175
- Semantic Scholar
- 30c502d1e668b67b17dd9c5f8a83c9e5520519e8
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
- Industrial Technology Innovation Program
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- participatory design, older adults, mild cognitive impairment, mood stabilization, medication reminders, human-robot interaction, user acceptance, personalization, end-user testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review