The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mathspeak: An Audio Method for Presenting Mathematical Formulae to Blind Students
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the problems involved with learning and understanding math for vision impaired students and developing a computer system approach for rendering mathematical formulae into audio form. Access to mathematics is an obstacle for blind students. The lack of easy access to mathematical resources is a barrier to higher education for many blind students and puts them at an unfair disadvantage in school, academia, and industry [1]. Results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress show that there is great disparity between the math skills of students with disabilities and students without disabilities [2]. A methodology for rendering technical documents, in particular, complex mathematical formula, in an audio descriptive form (Mathspeak) is presented in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Remediating PDFs based on their visual rendering raises ambiguities that have frustrated researchers for more than a decade.”
From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, making math accessible often begins with conversion of the visual formula to an unambiguous format such as TEX or MathML [24].”
From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Audio system for technical readings
Raman, T. V. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054978 · Cited by 121
Audio System for Technical Readings
Raman, T. V. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054977 · Cited by 37
Reading and writing mathematics
Karshmer, A. I., Gupta, G., Geiiger, S., & Weaver, C. (1998) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/274497.274524 · Cited by 23
Karshmer, A. I., Gupta, G., Miesenberger, K., Pontelli, E., & Guo, H. (2001) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 2007, Mathematics Now Added to the DAISY Standard
- gardner, 2001, Introduction to DotsPlus Braille
- noble, 2008, Universal Design for Math Learning Bridging the Technology and Policy Divide
- jayant, 2006, A Survey of Math Accessibility for Blind Persons and An Investigation on Text/Math Separation
- 2010, How Can Publishers Create Accessible Math Textbooks?
- dixon, 2007, Eight-dot Braille
- 2004, Dotless Braille for Nemeth
- nemeth, 1996, Teaching Mathematics As a Blind Person Speech Given to the Mathematical Association of America Orlando Florida
- larsson, 2008, Braille Representation and Mathematics Notation Comparison Different Electronic Formats for Mathematics and Their Implications for Braille Production
- sahyun, 0, Audio and Haptic Access to Math and Science - Audio Graphs, Triangle, MathPlus Toolbox and Tiger Printer, 15th IFIP World Congress Vienna 1998 2004, 6
- gardner, 2003, DotsPlus Braille Tutorial: Simplifying communication between sighted and blind people, CSUN 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maćkowski, M., Kawulok, M., Brzoza, P., & Spińczyk, D. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13127240 · Cited by 17
Creating Accessible Interactive Audio-Tactile Drawings using Spatial Augmented Reality
Thévin, L., Jouffrais, C., Rodier, N., Palard, N., Hachet, M., & Brock, A. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS) · doi:10.1145/3343055.3359711 · Cited by 17
Rule based intelligent system verbalizing mathematical notation
Bier, A., & Sroczyński, Z. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-07889-3 · Cited by 17
Omoush, M. H. A., & Mehigan, T. J. (2023) · International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA) · doi:10.1109/hora58378.2023.10156748 · Cited by 16
Mikułowski, D., & Brzostek-Pawłowska, J. (2014) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon.2014.6826223 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Nazemi, A., Murray, I., & Mohammadi, N.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Venue
- 2012 5th International Conference on Human System Interactions
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 48-52
- OpenAlex
- W2119082282
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Conference on Human System Interactions (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- mathematical formulas, audio description, blind students, visual impairment, text-to-speech, accessible computing, higher education access
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
