Decoding ERP Training for Non-Technical Users: A Novel Algorithm-Driven Framework for Enhanced Training Effectiveness
Abstract
This research studies Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) training for non-technical employees by integrating Machine Learning techniques, specifically Decision Tree algorithm, into the training analysis process. The research methodology comprises a dual approach: a qualitative analysis of 20 key ERP training articles and the application of Decision Tree algorithms for data categorization and prediction. This innovative method allows for an examination of training methodologies and effectiveness. Key findings from the literature underscore the necessity for user-friendly training approaches, particularly for non-technical stakeholders grappling with complex ERP systems. These findings informed the development of a novel training framework, which includes components like simplified system integration, gamified training modules, and AI-powered interactive support. This framework is designed to address common challenges faced by non-technical users, such as difficulties with system integration and the need for ongoing post-training support. A significant contribution of this study is the introduction of a novel algorithm to quantify training effectiveness. This algorithm represents a leap in evaluating ERP training approaches, moving from subjective assessments to a more structured, data-driven evaluation. It systematically assesses the impact of various training components, grounded in empirical evidence from the literature. The study not only contributes to academic research bu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inadequate training can result in user dissatisfaction and increased errors, which can jeopardise the success of the system.
“Inadequate training can result in user dissatisfaction and increased errors, which can jeopardise the success of the system [15].”
Effective training reduces resistance to change and increases user confidence, which ultimately leads to better system utilisation and satisfaction.
“Research shows that effective training reduces resistance to change and increases user confidence, which ultimately leads to better system utilisation and satisfaction [15].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sudarmo, S., Vandika, A. Y., & Fahrijal, R. (2024) · West Science Information System and Technology · doi:10.58812/wsist.v2i02.1209 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“[15].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Hong, K. C., & Bin Shibghatullah, A. S.
- Affiliations
- UCSI University (MY)
- UCSI University,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia
- Venue
- 2024 IEEE 9th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-04-05
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W4399485566
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP training, non-technical users, decision tree, training effectiveness evaluation, game-based training, system integration, post-training support, training framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review