The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical machines-a review
Abstract
Research has picked up a fervent pace in the area of fault diagnosis of electrical machines. Like adjustable speed drives, fault prognosis has become almost indispensable. The manufacturers of these drives are now keen to include diagnostic features in the software to decrease machine down time and improve salability. Prodigious improvement in signal processing hardware and software has made this possible. Primarily, these techniques depend upon locating specific harmonic components in the line current, also known as motor current signature analysis (MCSA). These harmonic components are usually different for different types of faults. However with multiple faults or different varieties of drive schemes, MCSA can become an onerous task as different types of faults and time harmonics may end up generating similar signatures. Thus other signals such as speed, torque, noise, vibration etc., are also explored for their frequency contents. Sometimes, altogether different techniques such as thermal measurements, chemical analysis, etc., are also employed to find out the nature and the degree of the fault. Human involvement in the actual fault detection decision making is slowly being replaced by automated tools such as expert systems, neural networks, fuzzy logic based systems to name a few. Keeping in mind the need for future research, this review paper describes different types of faults and the signatures they generate and their diagnostics' schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grubic, S., Aller, J. M., Lu, B., & Habetler, T. G. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2008.2004665 · Cited by 490
Fuchs, F. W. (2004) · IECON'03. 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37468) · doi:10.1109/iecon.2003.1280259 · Cited by 270
Rajagopalan, S., Roux, W. L., Habetler, T. G., & Harley, R. G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2007.904183 · Cited by 164
Machine Fault Signature Analysis
Jayaswal, P., Wadhwani, A. K., & Mulchandani, K. B. (2008) · International Journal of Rotating Machinery · doi:10.1155/2008/583982 · Cited by 111
Study on the Permanent Magnet Demagnetization Fault in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines
Rosero, J. A., Cusido, J., Garcia, A., Ortega, J. A., & Romeral, L. (2006) · IECON 2006 - 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/iecon.2006.347598 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Nandi, S., & Toliyat, H. A.
- Venue
- Conference Record of the 1999 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Forth IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36370)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003-01-20
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 197-204
- OpenAlex
- W2098626917
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical machines-a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ias.1999.799956
- The paper
- Nandi, S., & Toliyat, H. A. (2003). Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical machines-a review. Conference Record of the 1999 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Forth IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36370). https://doi.org/10.1109/ias.1999.799956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.