Cited by 18Artificial Intelligence in EducationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Unleashing the Power of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Exploring its Boundless Potential and Overcoming Challenges in Academic Environments

Fegade, Atul, Raut, Rajesh, Deshpande, Amruta, Mittal, Amit, Kaul, Natashaa, Khanna, Vandana·2023·2023 6th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)

Abstract

Integrating generative artificial intelligence tools can allow one to manage and develop novel business methods efficiently. With the introduction of self-learning generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools, the corporate world is trying to figure out the applications and their business implications. Major technology companies like Microsoft, Google, Facebook, etc., have shown enormous interest in investing in ventures developing generative AI tools/models. These tools/models can be experimented with, and their business use is being explored. The study aims to explore the potential uses of generative AI (GAI) in academics through its current capabilities and applications. The study also highlights the potential challenges and concerns arising from using generative AI in academics. The study has used descriptive and quantitative methods to answer the research questions. The study has used a questionnaire based on the Likert scale to measure the significance of indirect variables, viz. perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived trust (PT) on direct variable adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AGAI) in academics. The sample size consists of 100 students and 100 university professors. The study Mentions that perceived ease of use (PEOU) positively influences GAI (AGAI) adoption. Also, perceived trust (PT) has a predictive ability of AGIA when controlling for PEOU. The use of generative AI in a few years will become imperative in most human lives, which makes it mandatory to explore the possible ways of its adoption in the mainstream rather than avoiding or restricting its usage in academics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ic3i59117.2023.10397917

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fegade, A., Raut, R., Deshpande, A., Mittal, A., Kaul, N., & Khanna, V.
Affiliations
  • Sri Balaji University, Pune (IN)
  • Indira School of Business Studies,PGDM,Pune,India
  • Chitkara University (IN)
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
  • Sri Sukhmani Institute of Engineering & Technology,MBA Department,Mohali,India
Venue
2023 6th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-09-14
Pages
1243-1249
OpenAlex
W4391250126
Cited by
18
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
generative AI, AI adoption in academia, perceived ease of use, perceived trust, technology acceptance, university students, university faculty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review