Cited by 57Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingMusic and Audio Processing

Deepfake Audio Detection: A Deep Learning Based Solution for Group Conversations

Wijethunga, R.L.M.A.P.C., Matheesha, D.M.K., Noman, Abdullah Al, De Silva, K.H.V.T.A., Tissera, Muditha, Rupasinghe, Lakmal·2020·2020 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC)

Abstract

The recent advancements in deep learning and other related technologies have led to improvements in various areas such as computer vision, bio-informatics, and speech recognition etc. This research mainly focuses on a problem with synthetic speech and speaker diarization. The developments in audio have resulted in deep learning models capable of replicating natural-sounding voice also known as text-to-speech (TTS) systems. This technology could be manipulated for malicious purposes such as deepfakes, impersonation, or spoofing attacks. We propose a system that has the capability of distinguishing between real and synthetic speech in group conversations.We built Deep Neural Network models and integrated them into a single solution using different datasets, including but not limited to Urban-Sound8K (5.6GB), Conversational (12.2GB), AMI-Corpus (5GB), and FakeOrReal (4GB). Our proposed approach consists of four main components. The speech-denoising component cleans and preprocesses the audio using Multilayer- Perceptron and Convolutional Neural Network architectures, with 93% and 94% accuracies accordingly. The speaker diarization was implemented using two different approaches, Natural Language Processing for text conversion with 93% accuracy and Recurrent Neural Network model for speaker labeling with 80% accuracy and 0.52 Diarization-Error-Rate. The final component distinguishes between real and fake audio using a CNN architecture with 94 % accuracy. With these findings, this…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icac51239.2020.9357161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wijethunga et al. (2020)'s speech-denoising component cleans and preprocesses audio using Multilayer-Perceptron and CNN architectures with 93% and 94% accuracy, respectively.

    “The speech-denoising element helps clean and preprocesses audio using the Multilayer-Perceptron and CNN architectures, respectively, with 93% and 94% accuracy.”

    From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Wijethunga et al. (2020)

  • Wijethunga et al. (2020)'s final module uses a CNN architecture to discriminate between real and fraudulent audio with 94% accuracy.

    “The final module takes a CNN architecture to discriminate between real and fraudulent audio with a 94% accuracy.”

    From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Wijethunga et al. (2020)

  • Wijethunga et al. (2020) used NLP for text conversion with 93% accuracy and an RNN model for speaker tagging with 80% accuracy and 0.52 Diarization-Error Rate to accomplish speaker diarization.

    “Natural Language Processing (NLP) for text conversion with 93% accuracy and the RNN model for speaker tagging with 80% accuracy and 0.52 Diarization-Error Rate was used to accomplish speaker diarization.”

    From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Wijethunga et al. (2020)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wijethunga, R. L. M. A. P. C., Matheesha, D. M. K., Noman, A. A., De Silva, K. H. V. T. A., Tissera, M., & Rupasinghe, L.
Affiliations
Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology (LK)
Venue
2020 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12-10
Pages
192-197
OpenAlex
W3135508679
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
audio deepfake detection, synthetic speech detection, group conversation, speaker diarization, speech denoising

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review