Cited by 41Speech Recognition and SynthesisBiometric Identification and SecuritySpeech and Audio Processing

A survey on presentation attack detection for automatic speaker verification systems: State-of-the-art, taxonomy, issues and future direction

Open access
Tan, Choon Beng, Hijazi, Mohd Hanafi Ahmad, Khamis, Norazlina, Nohuddin, Puteri Nor Ellyza binti, Zainol, Zuraini, Coenen, Frans, Gani, Abdullah·2021·Multimedia Tools and Applications

Abstract

The emergence of biometric technology provides enhanced security compared to the traditional identification and authentication techniques that were less efficient and secure. Despite the advantages brought by biometric technology, the existing biometric systems such as Automatic Speaker Verification (ASV) systems are weak against presentation attacks. A presentation attack is a spoofing attack launched to subvert an ASV system to gain access to the system. Though numerous Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) systems were reported in the literature, a systematic survey that describes the current state of research and application is unavailable. This paper presents a systematic analysis of the state-of-the-art voice PAD systems to promote further advancement in this area. The objectives of this paper are two folds: (i) to understand the nature of recent work on PAD systems, and (ii) to identify areas that require additional research. From the survey, a taxonomy of voice PAD and the trend analysis of recent work on PAD systems were built and presented, whereby the recent and relevant articles including articles from Interspeech and ICASSP Conferences, mostly indexed by Scopus, published between 2015 and 2021 were considered. A total of 172 articles were surveyed in this work. The findings of this survey present the limitation of recent works, which include spoof-type dependent PAD. Consequently, the future direction of work on voice PAD for interested researchers is established. The findings of this survey present the limitation of recent works, which include spoof-type dependent PAD. Consequently, the future direction of work on voice PAD for interested researchers is established.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11042-021-11235-x

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Admuthe SS, Ghugardare S (2015) Survey paper on automatic speaker recognition systems. In: Inter- national conference on multimedia, computer graphics, and broadcasting international conference on signal processing, image processing, and pattern recognition, vol 4, pp 10895-10898
  2. ASVspoof consortium (2019) ASVspoof 2019: Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing and Coun- termeasures Challenge Evaluation Plan. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2019, pp 1-19
  3. Ramgire JB, Jagdale PSM (2016) A survey on speaker recognition with various feature extraction and classification techniques. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 3(4):709-712
  4. Sabhanayagam T, Prasanna Venkatesan V, Senthamaraikannan K (2018) A comprehensive survey on various biometric systems. Int J Appl Eng Res 13(5):2276-2297 101.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, C. B., Hijazi, M. H. A., Khamis, N., Nohuddin, P. N. E. B., Zainol, Z., Coenen, F., & Gani, A.
Affiliations
  • Universiti of Malaysia Sabah (MY)
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
  • National Defence University of Malaysia (MY)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Hijazi, Mohd Hanafi Ahmad
Venue
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Published
2021-08-04
Volume
80
Issue
21-23
Pages
32725-32762
ISSN
  • 1380-7501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7721
OpenAlex
W3187722398
Cited by
40
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Multimedia Tools and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
anti-spoofing, speaker verification, spoofing attacks, voice biometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review