Cited by 128Network Security and Intrusion DetectionSecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksCybersecurity and Information Systems

Man-in-the-middle attack in wireless and computer networking — A review

Bhushan, Bharat, Sahoo, G., Rai, Amit Kumar·2017·2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing,Communication & Automation (ICACCA) (Fall)

Abstract

One of the most discussed attacks in computer security is Man-In-The-Middle attack and it is a serious concern for many security professionals. The attackers target the actual data flowing between the endpoints and also compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the data. Adversary can compromise the confidentiality by eavesdropping and the integrity by message modification by communication interception. Adversary can also intercept, modify or destroy the messages to cause end of communication for one of the parties thereby leading to compromise of availability issue. In this paper, we present an extensive review on MITM to categorize and analyse the MITM attacks scope. We considered OSI reference model and two basic networking technologies such as GSM and UMTS. MITM attacks are classified based on various parameters such as attacker location, impersonation techniques and nature of channel. The existing countermeasures are surveyed. The paper categorize MITM attacks into four categories namely spoofing based MITM, TLS/SSL MITM, BGP MIT M and false base station based MITM attack. Finally we present prevention mechanisms for all such attacks and also identify few future research directions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icaccaf.2017.8344724

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Federated multi-task learning handles statistical and system challenges of FL like high communication costs, stragglers, and fault tolerance.

    “Federated multi-task learning [116]- [119] handles statistical and system challenges of FL like high communication costs, stragglers, and fault tolerance.”

    From Vulnerabilities in federated learning (2021) · cites this paper as [117]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhushan, B., Sahoo, G., & Rai, A. K.
Affiliations
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (IN)
Venue
2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing,Communication & Automation (ICACCA) (Fall)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-09
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2798334860
Cited by
128
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication & Automation (ICACCA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
Keywords
man-in-the-middle attacks, wireless network security, network security, eavesdropping, data integrity, confidentiality, spoofing attacks, SSL/TLS, BGP, GSM, UMTS, OSI model, attack classification, countermeasures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review