The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automatic emotional speech classification
Abstract
Our purpose is to design a useful tool which can be used in psychology to automatically classify utterances into five emotional states such as anger, happiness, neutral, sadness, and surprise. The major contribution of the paper is to rate the discriminating capability of a set of features for emotional speech recognition. A total of 87 features has been calculated over 500 utterances from the Danish Emotional Speech database. The sequential forward selection method (SFS) has been used in order to discover a set of 5 to 10 features which are able to classify the utterances in the best way. The criterion used in SFS is the cross-validated correct classification score of one of the following classifiers: nearest mean and Bayes classifier where class pdf are approximated via Parzen windows or modelled as Gaussians. After selecting the 5 best features, we reduce the dimensionality to two by applying principal component analysis. The result is a 51.6% /spl plusmn/ 3% correct classification rate at 95% confidence interval for the five aforementioned emotions, whereas a random classification would give a correct classification rate of 20%. Furthermore, we find out those two-class emotion recognition problems whose error rates contribute heavily to the average error and we indicate that a possible reduction of the error rates reported in this paper would be achieved by employing two-class classifiers and combining them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An experimental study of speech emotion recognition based on deep convolutional neural networks
Zheng, W. Q., Yu, J. S., & Zou, Y. X. (2015) · 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) · doi:10.1109/acii.2015.7344669 · Cited by 187
Play in predictive minds: A cognitive theory of play.
Andersen, M. M., Kiverstein, J., Miller, M., & Roepstorff, A. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000369 · Cited by 122
Error weighted semi-coupled hidden Markov model for audio-visual emotion recognition
Lin, J.-C., Wu, C.-H., & Wei, W.-L. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2011.2171334 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Ververidis, D., Kotropoulos, C., & Pitas, I.
- Venue
- 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-09-28
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- I-593-6
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167797544
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic emotional speech classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icassp.2004.1326055
- The paper
- Ververidis, D., Kotropoulos, C., & Pitas, I. (2004). Automatic emotional speech classification. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2004.1326055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.