Easy contextual intent prediction and slot detection
Abstract
Spoken language understanding (SLU) is one of the main tasks of a dialog system, aiming to identify semantic components in user utterances. In this paper, we investigate the incorporation of context into the SLU tasks of intent prediction and slot detection. Using a corpus that contains session-level information, including the start and end of a session and the sequence of utterances within it, we experiment with the incorporation of information from previous intra-session utterances into the SLU tasks on a given utterance. For slot detection, we find that including features indicating the slots appearing in the previous utterances gives no significant increase in performance. In contrast, for intent prediction we find that a similar approach that incorporates the intent of the previous utterance as a feature yields relative error rate reductions of 6.7% on transcribed data and 8.7% on automatically-recognized data. We also find similar gains when treating intent prediction of utterance sequences as a sequential tagging problem via SVM-HMMs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conversations do not fit a command-like structure, which makes it difficult to perform intent recognition and to apply NLP techniques.
“In addition, conversations do not fit a command-like structure, which makes it difficult to perform intent recognition—identifying a user’s intent from an utterance31—and to apply NLP techniques.19”
From Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden (2019) · cites this paper as [31]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden
Quiroz, J. C., Laranjo, L., Kocaballi, A. B., Berkovsky, S., Rezazadegan, D., & Coiera, E. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0190-1 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
End-to-end joint learning of natural language understanding and dialogue manager
Yang, X., Chen, Y.-N., Hakkani-Tur, D., Crook, P., Li, X., Gao, J., & Deng, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7953246 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationMulti-turn Intent Determination for Goal-oriented Dialogue systems
Abro, W. A., Qi, G., Gao, H., Khan, M. A., & Ali, Z. (2019) · 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8852246 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Conversational AI over Military Scenarios Using Intent Detection and Response Generation
Chuang, H.-M., & Cheng, D.-W. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12052494 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Try, Try, Try Again:” Sequence Analysis of User Interaction Data with a Voice User Interface
Myers, C. M., Laris Pardo, L. F., Acosta-Ruiz, A., Canossa, A., & Zhu, J. (2021) · CUI 2021 - 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3469595.3469613 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bhargava, A., Celikyilmaz, A., Hakkani-Tur, D., & Sarikaya, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-05
- Pages
- 8337-8341
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972595521
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- spoken language understanding, intent prediction, context modeling, dialogue systems, speech recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review