Cited by 15Speech and dialogue systemsAI in Service InteractionsNatural Language Processing Techniques

Conversational AI over Military Scenarios Using Intent Detection and Response Generation

Open access
Chuang, Hsiu-Min, Cheng, Ding-Wei·2022·Applied Sciences

Abstract

With the rise of artificial intelligence, conversational agents (CA) have found use in various applications in the commerce and service industries. In recent years, many conversational datasets have becomes publicly available, most relating to open-domain social conversations. However, it is difficult to obtain domain-specific or language-specific conversational datasets. This work focused on developing conversational systems based on the Chinese corpus over military scenarios. The soldier will need information regarding their surroundings and orders to carry out their mission in an unfamiliar environment. Additionally, using a conversational military agent will help soldiers obtain immediate and relevant responses while reducing labor and cost requirements when performing repetitive tasks. This paper proposes a system architecture for conversational military agents based on natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language generation (NLG). The NLU phase comprises two tasks: intent detection and slot filling. Detecting intent and filling slots involves predicting the user’s intent and extracting related entities. The goal of the NLG phase, in contrast, is to provide answers or ask questions to clarify the user’s needs. In this study, the military training task was when soldiers sought information via a conversational agent during the mission. In summary, we provide a practical approach to enabling conversational agents over military scenarios. Additionally, the proposed conversational system can be trained by other datasets for future application domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app12052494

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By deploying a conversational military agent, soldiers will get prompt, pertinent responses while working on repetitious chores with less effort and expense.

    “Additionally, by deploying a conversational military agent, soldiers will get prompt, pertinent responses while working on repetitious chores with less efort and expense [41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chuang, H.-M., & Cheng, D.-W.
Affiliations
National Defense University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chuang, Hsiu-Min
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-27
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
2494
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214758403
Cited by
15
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST-108-2221-E-606-013-MY2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
chatbots, military scenarios, intent classification, slot filling, natural language generation, natural language understanding, Chinese language, military education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review