The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Permutation invariant training of deep models for speaker-independent multi-talker speech separation
Open accessAbstract
We propose a novel deep learning training criterion, named permutation invariant training (PIT), for speaker independent multi-talker speech separation, commonly known as the cocktail-party problem. Different from the multi-class regression technique and the deep clustering (DPCL) technique, our novel approach minimizes the separation error directly. This strategy effectively solves the long-lasting label permutation problem, that has prevented progress on deep learning based techniques for speech separation. We evaluated PIT on the WSJ0 and Danish mixed-speech separation tasks and found that it compares favorably to non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), computational auditory scene analysis (CASA), and DPCL and generalizes well over unseen speakers and languages. Since PIT is simple to implement and can be easily integrated and combined with other advanced techniques, we believe improvements built upon PIT can eventually solve the cocktail-party problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Self-citationContext-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition
Dahl, G. E., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Acero, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2011.2134090 · Cited by 3,011
Self-citation
Cited by
Kolbaek, M., Yu, D., Tan, Z.-H., & Jensen, J. (2017) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2017.2726762 · Cited by 820
Self-citationAudio-Visual Scene Analysis with Self-Supervised Multisensory Features
Owens, A., & Efros, A. A. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01231-1_39 · Cited by 704
Distilled Binary Neural Network for Monaural Speech Separation
Chen, X., Liu, G., Shi, J., Xu, J., & Xu, B. (2018) · 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489456 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, D., Kolbaek, M., Tan, Z.-H., & Jensen, J.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-03
- Pages
- 241-245
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2460742184
- Cited by
- 839
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 59.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Permutation invariant training of deep models for speaker-independent multi-talker speech separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icassp.2017.7952154
- The paper
- Yu, D., Kolbaek, M., Tan, Z.-H., & Jensen, J. (2017). Permutation invariant training of deep models for speaker-independent multi-talker speech separation. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2017.7952154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.