Cited by 704Speech and Audio ProcessingMultisensory perception and integrationMusic and Audio Processing

Audio-Visual Scene Analysis with Self-Supervised Multisensory Features

Open access
Owens, Andrew, Efros, Alexei A.·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-01231-1_39

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both ViT and its variants have been widely applied to various computer vision tasks and work well for both supervised and self-supervised visual learning.

    “Both ViT and its variants have been widely applied to various computer vision tasks, including low-level tasks [92], recognition [93], detection [94], segmentation [95], etc, and also work well for both supervised [93] and self-supervised [96], [97], [98] visual learning.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [92]

  • Korbar et al. [148] broadened the scope of the audio-visual synchronization study to encompass arbitrary human activities rather than lip movements.

    “With the same training strategy, Korbar et al . [148] broadened the scope of the study to encompass arbitrary human activities rather than lip movements.”

    From Deep learning for visual speech analysis: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [148]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]11. Barker, J.P., Berthommier, F., Schwartz, J.L.: Is primitive av coherence an aid to segment the scene? In: AVSP'98 International Conference on Auditory-Visual Speech Processing. (1998) 3
  2. [31]31. Roweis, S.T.: One microphone source separation. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. (2001) 793-799 3
  3. [45]45. Gabbay, A., Shamir, A., Peleg, S.: Visual speech enhancement using noise-invariant training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08789 (2017) 4, 13, 14 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owens, A., & Efros, A. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Owens, Andrew
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
639-658
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2796992393
Cited by
704
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
63.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-16-C-0166)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
multisensory fusion, self-supervised learning, sound localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review