Federated Learning in the Sky: Joint Power Allocation and Scheduling with UAV Swarms
Open accessAbstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms must exploit machine learning (ML) in order to execute various tasks ranging from coordinated trajectory planning to cooperative target recognition. However, due to the lack of continuous connections between the UAV swarm and ground base stations (BSs), using centralized ML will be challenging, particularly when dealing with a large volume of data. In this paper, a novel framework is proposed to implement distributed federated learning (FL) algorithms within a UAV swarm that consists of a leading UAV and several following UAVs. Each following UAV trains a local FL model based on its collected data and then sends this trained local model to the leading UAV who will aggregate the received models, generate a global FL model, and transmit it to followers over the intra-swarm network. To identify how wireless factors, like fading, transmission delay, and UAV antenna angle deviations resulting from wind and mechanical vibrations, impact the performance of FL, a rigorous convergence analysis for FL is performed. Then, a joint power allocation and scheduling design is proposed to optimize the convergence rate of FL while taking into account the energy consumption during convergence and the delay requirement imposed by the swarm's control system. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the FL convergence analysis and show that the joint design strategy can reduce the number of communication rounds needed for convergence by as much as 35% compared with the baseline design.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decentralized FL in Industry 4.0 can be realized by combining with blockchain technology which can provide high degrees of security with immutable ledgers and smart contracts that can provide authentication for learning interactions in FL implementation.
“Particularly, decentralized FL in Industry 4.0 can be realized by combining with the blockchain technology which can provide high degrees of security with immutable ledgers and smart contracts that can provide authentication for learning interactions in FL implementation [171].”
From Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey (2021) · cites this paper as [171]
When edge AI is employed, energy consumption associated with sending data to servers can be further decreased through distributed federated learning within a UAV swarm.
“Additionally, when edge AI is employed, this sending of data to servers and the energy consumption associated with it can be further decreased through distributed federated learning within a UAV swarm.”
From A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [88]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on federated learning
Zhang, C., Xie, Y., Bai, H., Yu, B., Li, W., & Gao, Y. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106775 · Cited by 1,899 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., & Vincent Poor, H. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3075439 · Cited by 1,503 · see citing works
“[142] UAV communications HFL UAVs UAV An FL-based framework for UAV power control and scheduling.”
MethodFederated learning review: Fundamentals, enabling technologies, and future applications
Banabilah, S., Aloqaily, M., Alsayed, E., Malik, N., & Jararweh, Y. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103061 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges
McEnroe, P., Wang, S., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3176400 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Drones’ Edge Intelligence Over Smart Environments in B5G: Blockchain and Federated Learning Synergy
Alsamhi, S. H., Almalki, F. A., Afghah, F., Hawbani, A., Shvetsov, A. V., Lee, B., & Song, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2021.3132561 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Abdellatif, A. A., Mhaisen, N., Mohamed, A., Erbad, A., Guizani, M., Dawy, Z., & Nasreddine, W. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2021.10.016 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zeng, T., Semiari, O., Mozaffari, M., Chen, M., Saad, W., & Bennis, M.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
- Ericsson (United States) (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Venue
- ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-06
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3045898871
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 52.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1739642, 1941348)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Keywords
- federated learning, UAV swarms, unmanned aerial vehicles, power allocation, scheduling, convergence rate, energy consumption, fading, transmission delay, distributed learning, convergence analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review