Achieving Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Irrelevant Updates over E-Health Applications
Abstract
The widespread use of edge devices in E-Health such as smartphones and wearables means richer electronic health records (EHR) are becoming available. Training deep learning models on these data can effectively improve the quality of healthcare services. Recently, federated learning (FL) has received extensive attention in E-Health because it can train a model by only sharing gradients without disclosing the original EHR of owners. In this case, however, the adversary can still violate EHR owners' privacy based on shared gradients. To mitigate privacy threat, several privacy-preserving FL protocols have been proposed by utilizing different cryptography techniques. Unfortunately, existing privacy-preserving FL schemes do not take into account irrelevant updates, which are useless for the convergence of the global model. This may reduce the predictive accuracy and worse may lead to the uselessness of the final model. In this paper, we propose PFL-IU, an efficient and privacy-preserving FL framework that is compatible with irrelevant updates. Specifically, we first design a communication-efficient secure aggregation protocol by using a non-interactive key generation algorithm. Then we present a sign method to mitigate the negative impact incurred by irrelevant updates, which will accelerate model convergence and improve predictive accuracy. Moreover, PFL-IU is robust to EHR owners' dropout during the whole training phase. Extensive experiments using the real-world dataset demonstrate that PFL-IU can achieve better performance in terms of accuracy, convergence and efficiency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors of [71] propose that unnecessary changes be deleted by examining the importance of small variations in the FL structure for every EHR user, to increase the quality and precision of integration.
“The authors of [71] propose that unnecessary changes be deleted by examining the importance of small variations in the FL structure for every EHR user, to increase the quality and precision of integration.”
From A comprehensive survey on federated learning techniques for healthcare informatics (2023) · cites this paper as [71]
Chen et al. proposed PFL-IU, an efficient and privacy-preserving system compatible with irrelevant updates, and results showed good performance in privacy, accuracy, convergence and efficiency.
“With the increasing EHRs collected from smartphones and wearable devices, Chen et al. [49] proposed an efficient and privacy-preserving system (PFL-IU), which is compatible with irrelevant updates. The results showed that the PFL-IU has good performance in terms of privacy, accuracy, convergence and efficiency.”
From A Review of Privacy Enhancement Methods for Federated Learning in Healthcare Systems (2023) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Chen, H., Li, H., Xu, G., Zhang, Y., & Luo, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Soochow University (CN)
- Venue
- ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-06
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3045693096
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- privacy-preserving federated learning, electronic health records, secure aggregation, gradient privacy, model convergence, edge devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review