Cited by 139Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCloud Data Security Solutions

A Review of Privacy Enhancement Methods for Federated Learning in Healthcare Systems

Open access
Gu, Xin, Sabrina, Fariza, Fan, Zongwen, Sohail, Shaleeza·2023·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) provides a distributed machine learning system that enables participants to train using local data to create a shared model by eliminating the requirement of data sharing. In healthcare systems, FL allows Medical Internet of Things (MIoT) devices and electronic health records (EHRs) to be trained locally without sending patients data to the central server. This allows healthcare decisions and diagnoses based on datasets from all participants, as well as streamlining other healthcare processes. In terms of user data privacy, this technology allows collaborative training without the need of sharing the local data with the central server. However, there are privacy challenges in FL arising from the fact that the model updates are shared between the client and the server which can be used for re-generating the client’s data, breaching privacy requirements of applications in domains like healthcare. In this paper, we have conducted a review of the literature to analyse the existing privacy and security enhancement methods proposed for FL in healthcare systems. It has been identified that the research in the domain focuses on seven techniques: Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Blockchain, Hierarchical Approaches, Peer to Peer Sharing, Intelligence on the Edge Device, and Mixed, Hybrid and Miscellaneous Approaches. The strengths, limitations, and trade-offs of each technique were discussed, and the possible future for these seven privacy enhancement techniques for healthcare FL systems was identified.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review analyzes privacy and security enhancement methods for federated learning (FL) in healthcare systems, categorizing 40 relevant articles into seven approaches. It discusses each approach’s strengths, weaknesses, trade-offs, and future directions.

Key findings

  • A Scopus search returned 216 records; 39 were identified as relevant, plus one added from a reference list, yielding 40 articles. The review groups them into seven techniques: Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Blockchain, Hierarchical Approaches, Peer-to-Peer Sharing, Intelligence on the Edge Device, and Mixed/Hybrid/Miscellaneous Approaches.
  • Differential privacy provides quantifiable privacy guarantees but introduces a privacy–accuracy trade-off; one end-to-end FL + DP pipeline reported prediction accuracy decreased by 2%, while another study found that increasing the number of participants achieved high differential privacy guarantees with minimal effect on model accuracy.
  • Blockchain-based FL-chain systems enhance transparency, security, and collaboration, but all four reviewed FL-chain systems adopted additional privacy-enhancement methods, and consensus mechanisms add significant computational overhead and scalability challenges.
  • Intelligence on the edge device can avoid adding noise and showed higher accuracy than differential privacy in one scheme, but it faces limited computational resources, device heterogeneity, data imbalance, and governance limitations.

Methods

  • Literature review using Scopus with the Boolean query: TITLE-ABS-KEY (“federated learning” AND (“ehealth” OR “health”) AND (“security” OR “privacy” OR “trust”)).
  • Screening required papers to match all three components—FL, health, and privacy/security/trust—resulting in 39 relevant articles; one additional article was included from a reference list, for 40 total.
  • Inclusion was limited to 2020–2023 literature that specifically provides privacy guarantees for sensitive medical data; selected papers were categorized into seven privacy-enhancement areas and analyzed for strengths, weaknesses, trade-offs, and future work.

Limitations

  • The paper does not present a dedicated limitations section; it states that each privacy-enhancement technique has trade-offs, such as DP accuracy loss, HE computational overhead, blockchain scalability and transparency–privacy conflicts, P2P trust and coordination issues, edge resource constraints, and hybrid-approach complexity.
  • Evident from the text: the search was Scopus-only and restricted to 2020–2023, with 40 included articles; no formal quality appraisal or meta-analysis is described.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20156539

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 79 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    A set of 39 articles were identified as relevant.

    “As a result, a set of 39 articles were identified as relevant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    40 relevant articles were identified and included in this review.

    “As a result, 40 relevant articles were identified and included in this review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The research in the domain focuses on seven privacy enhancement techniques: Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Blockchain, Hierarchical Approaches, Peer to Peer Sharing, Intelligence on the Edge Device, and Mixed, Hybrid and Miscellaneous Approaches.

    “It has been identified that the research in the domain focuses on seven techniques: Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Blockchain, Hierarchical Approaches, Peer to Peer Sharing, Intelligence on the Edge Device, and Mixed, Hybrid and Miscellaneous Approaches.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 40 articles identified through the Scopus search are representative of the existing privacy enhancement methods for federated learning in healthcare systems.
    • Rests on an assumption: The seven categories used to classify the selected papers are exhaustive and mutually exclusive for privacy enhancement methods in federated learning healthcare.
  • Findingnone given

    All four FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] from this review adopted additional privacy enhancement methods to improve privacy protection.

    “All of the four FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] from this review adopted additional privacy enhancement methods to improve privacy protection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [42] Chang, Y., Fang, C., and Sun, W. (2021). A blockchain-based federated learning method for smart healthcare. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2021. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] Passerat-Palmbach, J., Farnan, T., McCoy, M., Harris, J.D., Manion, S.T., Flannery, H.L., and Gleim, B. (2020, January 3–6). Blockchain-orchestrated machine learning for privacy preserving federated learning in electronic health data. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), Toronto, ON, Canada. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] Salim, 2022, Federated learning-based secure electronic health record sharing scheme in medical informatics, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning

    The consensus process in the FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] requires significant computational resources.

    “Besides the integration of the additional privacy enhancement methods, the consensus process in the FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] requires significant computational resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [42] Chang, Y., Fang, C., and Sun, W. (2021). A blockchain-based federated learning method for smart healthcare. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2021. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] Passerat-Palmbach, J., Farnan, T., McCoy, M., Harris, J.D., Manion, S.T., Flannery, H.L., and Gleim, B. (2020, January 3–6). Blockchain-orchestrated machine learning for privacy preserving federated learning in electronic health data. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), Toronto, ON, Canada. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] Salim, 2022, Federated learning-based secure electronic health record sharing scheme in medical informatics, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 109
  • May combine two claims. 80
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Through Scopus search, 216 records were returned.

    “Through Scopus search, 216 records were returned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    There is no review conducted on privacy enhancement methods used in federated learning in healthcare systems.

    “There is no review conducted on privacy enhancement methods used in FL in healthcare systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 40 articles identified through the Scopus search are representative of the existing privacy enhancement methods for federated learning in healthcare systems.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The existing work in this review presented approaches including adding gradient [42], extra elements [43], hashed EHR address [44], and additional rules [45].

    “The existing work in this review presented the approaches including adding gradient [42], extra elements [43], hashed EHR address [44], and additional rules [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [42] Chang, Y., Fang, C., and Sun, W. (2021). A blockchain-based federated learning method for smart healthcare. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2021. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] Passerat-Palmbach, J., Farnan, T., McCoy, M., Harris, J.D., Manion, S.T., Flannery, H.L., and Gleim, B. (2020, January 3–6). Blockchain-orchestrated machine learning for privacy preserving federated learning in electronic health data. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), Toronto, ON, Canada. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] Salim, 2022, Federated learning-based secure electronic health record sharing scheme in medical informatics, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    Mixed approaches have shown high performance in FL by addressing challenges associated with privacy preservation.

    “These mixed approaches have shown high performance in FL by addressing the challenges associated with privacy preservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Various techniques (such as ML and AI models, noise injection, encryption) have been used in existing literature to improve privacy of data in health systems.

    “As discussed in the Section 4.1, various techniques (such as the use of various ML and AI models, injection of noise, use of encryption techniques etc) have been used in the existing literature to improve the privacy of data in health systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Federated learning provides mitigation of privacy risks compared to centralized machine learning models but is still vulnerable to attacks when extracting information from the gradients sent by participants to the aggregation server.

    “FL provides mitigation of privacy risks as compared to centralized machine learning models but is still vulnerable to attacks when it comes to extracting information from the gradients sent by the participants to the aggregation server.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Scopus has the widest coverage in peer-reviewed scholarly journals and publications among bibliographic databases.

    “the relevant academic publishing was collected from Scopus which has been supported as having the widest coverage in peer-reviewed scholarly journals and publications among bibliographic databases [21,22,23].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] Gu, 2017, Characterisation of academic journals in the digital age, Scientometrics source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] 2005, Google Scholar: The pros and the cons, Online Inf. Rev. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Federated learning provides a distributed machine learning system that enables participants to train their local model on local data and eliminates the requirement of data sharing.

    “Compared to the traditional machine learning system which collects data from all sources and trains data at a central server, FL provides a distributed machine learning system that enables participants to train their local model on local data and eliminates the requirement of data sharing [1].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Rieke, 2020, The future of digital health with federated learning, NPJ Digit. Med. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    In healthcare, federated learning allows multiple healthcare institutions to collaborate and train machine learning models based on decentralized data without sharing sensitive patient information.

    “In the context of healthcare, FL allows multiple healthcare institutions to collaborate and train machine learning models based on decentralized data without the need of sharing sensitive patient information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Differential privacy provides required privacy guarantees at the cost of reducing the prediction accuracy of the machine learning model.

    “DP provides the required privacy guarantees at the cost of reducing the prediction accuracy of the machine learning model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Blockchain technology can help overcome challenges of ensuring participating devices are trustworthy and not malicious, and fairness and transparency in reward distribution, to manage the federated learning process without intermediaries.

    “Blockchain technology can help overcome these challenges to manage the FL process without the need for intermediaries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Nguyen, 2021, Federated learning meets blockchain in edge computing: Opportunities and challenges, IEEE Internet Things J. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [39] Shayan, 2020, Biscotti: A blockchain system for private and secure federated learning, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A multi-modal machine learning model uses homomorphic encryption to securely share data required for training machine learning models.

    “A multi-modal machine learning model is proposed to effectively solve the problem of data islands and uses homomorphic encryption to securely share data required for training machine learning models [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Ji, J., Yan, D., and Mu, Z. (2022, January 15–17). Personnel status detection model suitable for vertical federated learning structure. Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing, Haikou, China. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In federated learning for COVID-19 detection using chest X-rays and symptoms across multiple hospitals, non-IID privacy preservation is achieved by adding differential privacy stochastic gradient descent, which provides resilience to adaptive attacks with auxiliary information.

    “In addition to the measures to improve model accuracy for data, non-IID privacy preservation is achieved by adding the differential privacy stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) which provides required resilience to adaptive attacks auxiliary information [26].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Ho, T.T., Tran, K.D., and Huang, Y. (2022). FedSGDCOVID: Federated SGD COVID-19 Detection under Local Differential Privacy Using Chest X-ray Images and Symptom Information. Sensors, 22. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An FL-based anomaly detection system using differential privacy provides privacy guarantees to data owners and uses machine learning to secure network traffic.

    “An FL-based anomaly detection system is proposed that uses DP to provide privacy guarantees to data owners and uses machine learning to secure network traffic [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Cholakoska, A., Pfitzner, B., Gjoreski, H., Rakovic, V., Arnrich, B., and Kalendar, M. (2021, January 21–26). Differentially Private Federated Learning for Anomaly Detection in eHealth Networks. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, New York, NY, USA. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An end-to-end pipeline consisting of federated learning and differential privacy for health data streams using clustering reduces model training time with high accuracy, and prediction accuracy only decreases by 2% due to differential privacy.

    “An end-to-end pipeline consisting of FL and DR is proposed for health data streams using a clustering mechanism to reduce model training time with high accuracy [31]. DP mechanism is used by the system to provide privacy guarantees and results showed that prediction accuracy only decreases by 2% for the trained model due to this change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Imtiaz, S., Horchidan, S.F., Abbas, Z., Arsalan, M., Chaudhry, H.N., and Vlassov, V. (2020, January 10–13). Privacy preserving time-series forecasting of user health data streams. 2020, Atlanta, GA, USA. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An edge aggregator that introduces artificial noise to client model parameters in three steps still provided good model accuracy while achieving privacy due to the introduction of the noise.

    “Therefore, an edge aggregator is proposed that introduces artificial noise to the client model parameters in three steps [27]. The introduction of this aggregator still provided good model accuracy while achieving privacy due to the introduction of the noise.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Akter, 2022, Edge Intelligence: Federated Learning-Based Privacy Protection Framework for Smart Healthcare Systems, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A blockchain-enabled collaborative federated learning architecture using differential privacy for safeguarding user data and blockchain for secure sharing of data provides security to processes requiring data sharing, per theoretical analysis.

    “A blockchain-enabled collaborative FL architecture is proposed that uses DP for safeguarding user data and blockchain for secure sharing of data [30]. The theoretical analysis showed that the system provides security to the processes that require sharing of data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Das, P., Singh, M., and Roy, D.G. (2021, January 7–11). A secure softwarized blockchain-based federated health alliance for next generation IoT networks. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Madrid, Spain. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A privacy-aware and resource-saving collaborative learning protocol provides privacy for electronic health records in resource-saving scenarios by outsourcing the major learning component to cloud servers and using lightweight data perturbation and packed partially homomorphic encryption.

    “A privacy-aware and resource-saving collaborative learning protocol is proposed to provide privacy for EHRs when the FL system is engaged in resource-saving scenario [38].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Hao, M., Li, H., Xu, G., Liu, Z., and Chen, Z. (2020, January 7–11). Privacy-aware and resource-saving collaborative learning for healthcare in cloud computing. Proceedings of the ICC 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, Ireland. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Statistical feature selection and differential privacy approaches reduce data transmission and add noise to local models before sending them to the federated learning server, and results showed good accuracy with the desired level of privacy.

    “Statistical feature selection and differential privacy approaches are adopted [28] to reduce the data transmission and to add noise to the local models before sending those to the FL server for aggregation. The results showed good accuracy with the desired level of privacy applied to the model parameters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Islam, T.U., Ghasemi, R., and Mohammed, N. (2022, January 26–29). Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Model for Healthcare Data. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chang, Fang, and Sun proposed an FL-chain system with adaptive differential privacy that adjusts noise on the gradient to balance privacy and accuracy in a MIoT environment, with a gradient verification-based consensus protocol preventing malicious attacks and single point of failure.

    “Chang, Fang, and Sun [42] proposed an FL-chain system with an adaptive differential privacy algorithm. Technically, the system adjusts the amount of noise by adding on the gradient to achieve the balance between privacy and accuracy in a MIoT environment. The key strength of this FL-chain system is the gradient verification-based consensus protocol which is implemented to prevent malicious attacks”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Chang, Y., Fang, C., and Sun, W. (2021). A blockchain-based federated learning method for smart healthcare. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2021. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lakhan et al. implemented fraud detection using rule-based blockchain in an IoMT federated learning network, proposing an FL-BETS framework with dynamic heuristics to identify and ensure privacy preservation and fraud of data at various levels.

    “Lakhan et al. [45] implemented fraud detection using the rule-based blockchain in the IoMT FL network. In this study, an FL-chain-enabled task scheduling (FL-BETS) framework with different dynamic heuristics was proposed. The goal of FL-BETS is to identify and ensure the privacy preservation and fraud of data at various levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Lakhan, 2022, Federated-learning based privacy preservation and fraud-enabled blockchain IoMT system for healthcare, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Salim and Park presented a secure EHR scheme in a hospital using federated learning and blockchain, where IPFS stores private data, EHR hashed addresses are recorded on a Consortium Blockchain, access is granted by patients via smart contracts, and EHR data are trained locally and globally.

    “Salim and Park [44] presented a secure EHR scheme in a hospital that adopted FL and blockchain technology. In the scheme, Inter Planetary File System (IPFS) stores private data. In the IPFS, all EHR hashed addresses are recorded using a Consortium Blockchain-based network. Access to the EHR is granted by individual patients enabled by smart contracts. EHR data are trained both locally and globally”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Salim, 2022, Federated learning-based secure electronic health record sharing scheme in medical informatics, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gupta et al. proposed a hierarchical federated learning approach for IoMT allowing data aggregation at different levels enabling multiple healthcare organisations to collaborate securely, with grouping based on disease groups and FEDTIMEDIS LSTM for anomaly detection.

    “Gupta et al. [46] proposed a hierarchical FL approach for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) application which allows data aggression at different levels enabling multiple healthcare organisations to collaborate with each other securely. A novel approach of grouping is proposed where the data is grouped based on different disease groups. The authors also developed a novel technique, called”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Gupta, D., Kayode, O., Bhatt, S., Gupta, M., and Tosun, A.S. (2021, January 13–15). Hierarchical Federated Learning based Anomaly Detection using Digital Twins for Smart Healthcare. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), Atlanta, GA, USA. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Singh et al. introduced a Hierarchical FL model based on Dew-Cloud technology offering enhanced data confidentiality for IoMT, with HLSTM deployed at distributed Dew servers for intrusion detection, and the authors claim it can gain users' trust.

    “Singh et al. [47] introduced a Hierarchical FL (HFL) model based on Dew-Cloud technology, which offers an enhanced level of data confidentiality for Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) applications. In this study, for detecting intrusion in incoming traffic a hierarchical long-term memory (HLSTM) model has also been deployed at distributed Dew servers. The authors claim that the proposed model can”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Singh, 2022, Dew-Cloud-Based Hierarchical Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoMT, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In an FL-chain system, participating devices can be identified and verified using their public key, ensuring only trustworthy devices participate.

    “In an FL-chain (FL with blockchain technology) system, the participating devices can be identified and verified using their public key [40]. This ensures that only trustworthy devices are allowed to participate in the learning process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Ali, 2021, Integration of blockchain and federated learning for Internet of Things: Recent advances and future challenges, Comput. Secur. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Abdellatif et al. presented a hierarchical federated learning application to enhance privacy in healthcare, with End User, edge node, and centralized server layers; End Users train a deep learning model without sharing raw data by connecting to edge nodes, which connect to a centralized server; the method achieves efficiency considering varying data distributions and wireless conditions.

    “Abdellatif et al. [48] presented a hierarchical FL application that aims to enhance privacy in healthcare applications. The proposed architecture comprises different layers such as End User (EU) layer, Edge node layer, and Centralized Server layer. In this approach, EUs collaborate to train a deep learning model without sharing raw data, by connecting to the edge nodes within their communication”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Abdellatif, 2022, Communication-efficient hierarchical federated learning for IoT heterogeneous systems with imbalanced data, Future Gener. Comput. Syst. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wang et al. proposes PPFLEC using a privacy protection protocol based on a shared secret and weight mask, a random mask scheme of secret sharing, lightweight features for IoMT on the edge, and uses a hash function and digital signature to ensure message integrity and protect from replay attacks.

    “Wang et al. [50] proposes a Privacy Protection Scheme for FL under Edge Computing (PPFLEC) that uses a newly proposed privacy protection protocol based on a shared secret and weight mask. The proposed protocol uses a random mask scheme of secret sharing and focuses on achieving lightweight features to make it suitable for the Internet of Medical Things on the edge. This work also uses a hash”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Wang, 2022, Privacy-preserving federated learning for internet of medical things under edge computing, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wang et al. proposed a novel protocol for parameter aggregation in federated learning for edge devices with limited capacity, aiming to improve security while reducing communication and computational overhead, using orthogonal gradient aggregation to protect previously learned knowledge when related training samples are removed and ensure privacy.

    “Wang et al. [52] proposed a novel protocol for parameter aggression in FL and its application for edge devices that have limited capacity. The goal is to improve security while reducing communication and computational overhead. The authors has proposed a novel approach of orthogonal gradient aggregation (OGA) that can protect previously learned knowledge when the related training samples are”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Wang, 2022, Secure and efficient parameters aggregation protocol for federated incremental learning and its applications, Int. J. Intell. Syst. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Peer-to-peer sharing in federated learning facilitates exchange of model updates between participating devices and enhances efficiency by reducing computational burden on centralized servers, and can improve user privacy without a central intermediary.

    “To achieve high efficiency, peer-to-peer sharing (P2PS) in FL is utilised to facilitate the exchange of model updates between participating devices and enhance the efficiency of the learning process by reducing the computational burden on centralized servers. In addition, P2PS can also improve user privacy without the need for a central intermediary to store and process sensitive data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Akter et al. proposed an edge aggregator that introduces noise to clients' model parameters and employs differential privacy while considering the privacy budget, and results showed high model accuracy.

    “To achieve this goal, Akter et al. [27] proposed an edge aggregator that introduces noise to the clients’ model parameters and by employing DP while considering the privacy budget, the results showed high model accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Akter, 2022, Edge Intelligence: Federated Learning-Based Privacy Protection Framework for Smart Healthcare Systems, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A border gateway and cloud aggregator scheme using a mask and digital signature, with a common mask vector added before sending the updated model to gateways, shows higher accuracy than systems using differential privacy because no noise is added.

    “Border gateways collect the initial model from the cloud and then train the model with the data collected from edge intelligent devices. A mask and digital signature are used to secure model parameters after training at the gateways. The aggregator at the cloud adds a common mask vector before sending the updated model to the gateways. As no noise is added to the model parameters so the model”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Wang, 2022, Privacy-preserving federated learning for internet of medical things under edge computing, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chen et al. proposed PFL-IU, an efficient and privacy-preserving system compatible with irrelevant updates, and results showed good performance in privacy, accuracy, convergence and efficiency.

    “With the increasing EHRs collected from smartphones and wearable devices, Chen et al. [49] proposed an efficient and privacy-preserving system (PFL-IU), which is compatible with irrelevant updates. The results showed that the PFL-IU has good performance in terms of privacy, accuracy, convergence and efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] Chen, H., Li, H., Xu, G., Zhang, Y., and Luo, X. (2020, January 20–23). Achieving privacy-preserving federated learning with irrelevant updates over e-health applications. Proceedings of the ICC 2020–2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, Ireland. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hakak et al. proposed a framework providing privacy by incorporating cloud, edge and application modules, with local and central aggregation, local controller saving data, encrypted local weights aggregated locally, sent to cloud aggregator, using homomorphic encryption.

    “Hakak et al. [51] proposed a framework that provides privacy of data by incorporating cloud, edge and application modules. By providing aggregation at the local device and central cloud level, the privacy of data is maintained. Based on application requirements local controller saves the data and the updated encrypted local weights from the local devices are aggregated locally by the local aggreg”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Hakak, S., Ray, S., Khan, W.Z., and Scheme, E. (2020, January 10–13). A Framework for Edge-Assisted Healthcare Data Analytics using Federated Learning. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Atlanta, GA, USA. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gandhi et al. proposed a federated learning system to maintain integrity of sensitive medical data using deep-learning models for cancer text classification, and results showed effectiveness in addressing privacy issues.

    “Gandhi et al. [35] proposed an FL system to maintain the integrity of sensitive medical data by using a few deep-learning models for cancer text classification. Their results showed that the proposed framework is effective in addressing the privacy issues of sensitive medical data for cancer text classification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Gandhi, N., Mishra, S., Bharti, S.K., and Bhagat, K. (2021, January 9–11). Leveraging towards Privacy-preserving using Federated Machine Learning for Healthcare Systems. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), Bangalore, India. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    DP has no contribution to data governance in an FL system; data quality, data access policies and consent management are not part of the DP approach.

    “DP has no contribution to data governance in an FL system, aspects like data quality, data access policies and consent management are not part of the DP approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A syntactic anonymity approach for federated learning systems provides required privacy guarantees and still has good model accuracy, providing interpretable universal privacy guarantees.

    “Instead of the commonly used differential privacy approach, the syntactic approach is proposed for FL systems that provide required guarantees for privacy and still have good model accuracy [53]. The proposed syntactic anonymity approach provides interpretable universal privacy guarantees.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] Choudhury, O., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Salonidis, T., Sylla, I., Park, Y., Hsu, G., and Das, A. (September, January 29). A syntactic approach for privacy-preserving federated learning. Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2020), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Combining blockchain with homomorphic encryption presents a decentralised, transparent privacy-preserving solution for smart parking with minimum computation and communication overhead.

    “For example, by combining blockchain with homomorphic encryption a decentralised, transparent privacy-preserving solution is presented for smart parking with minimum computation and communication overhead [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Haritha, 2023, Asymmetric Consortium Blockchain and Homomorphically Polynomial-Based PIR for Secured Smart Parking Systems, Comput. Mater. Contin.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Hybrid approaches improve the overall performance of FL models by leveraging the strengths of different models.

    “The purpose of the hybrid approaches is to improve the overall performance of the models used in FL by leveraging the strengths of different models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Domain-specific knowledge can be incorporated into training to improve model robustness.

    “In addition, domain-specific knowledge can be incorporated into the training to improve the model’s robustness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The federated learning system using a syntactic privacy model used healthcare data to predict adverse drug reactions and mortality rates and benchmarked against the centralized model.

    “The FL system used healthcare data to predict adverse drug reactions and mortality rates and benchmarked against the centralized model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] Choudhury, O., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Salonidis, T., Sylla, I., Park, Y., Hsu, G., and Das, A. (September, January 29). A syntactic approach for privacy-preserving federated learning. Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2020), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    All clients may use the same encryption/decryption methods, which provides transparency of the homomorphic encryption mechanism.

    “All clients may use the same encryption/decryption methods which provides transparency of the homomorphic encryption mechanism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The decentralized and trust-enhancing properties of blockchain technology facilitate collaboration in FL systems.

    “The decentralized and trust-enhancing properties of blockchain technology facilitate collaboration in FL systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The transparent nature of blockchain enables all participants in FL systems to have visibility into updates and changes made to the model.

    “The transparent nature of the blockchain enables all participants in the FL systems to have visibility into the updates and changes made to the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Participants have higher trust in the shared model and the integrity of updates due to the consensus mechanism and immutability.

    “Participants have higher trust in the shared model and the integrity of the updates due to the consensus mechanism and immutability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Collaboration is supported in HE-based systems because clients keep control of their data and allow computations on encrypted shared model information without raising privacy concerns.

    “Collaboration is supported in HE-based systems as clients keep control of their data and allow computations on the encrypted shared model information without raising privacy concerns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Smart contracts can be utilized to define and enforce data usage policies, ensuring that data is shared and utilized in accordance with predefined rules and regulations.

    “Smart contracts can be utilized to define and enforce data usage policies, ensuring that data is shared and utilized in accordance with predefined rules and regulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Blockchain technology in FL systems enhances privacy, security, and transparency.

    “The strengths of using blockchain technology in FL systems lie in its ability to enhance privacy, security, and transparency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    DP introduces noise to data, which adversely affects the prediction accuracy of ML algorithms.

    “DP does that by introducing noise to the data, which adversely affects the prediction accuracy of the ML algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Blockchain's architecture, including local data storage on individual devices, cryptographic algorithms and immutability, provides enhanced data privacy and security.

    “The inherent architecture of blockchain including the local data storage on individual devices, in addition to the cryptographic algorithms and immutability feature in the blockchain technology, provides enhanced data privacy and security.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All DP approaches add computational overhead and increase design complexity because clients perform additional tasks for adding noise to model parameters before sending them to the server.

    “Similarly, as the clients need to perform additional tasks for adding noise to the model parameters before sending those to the server so all DP approaches add computational overhead and increase design complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The transparent nature of blockchain can expose certain information, which may be harmful to sensitive data in FL-chain systems.

    “The transparent nature of blockchain can expose certain information. This may be harmful to sensitive data in FL-chain systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    HE-based approaches for FL have weaknesses in resource usage; the encryption process adds design complexity, increased computational overhead and increased energy consumption for resource-constrained IoT devices.

    “The encryption process that clients need to perform adds design complexity, increased computational overhead and also results in increased energy consumption for resource constraint IoT devices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Governance is an important factor in HE because management of encryption keys is a challenge.

    “Governance is an important factor in this case as the management of encryption keys is a challenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Integrating blockchain into an FL system requires significant development work and expertise, smart contracts, consensus mechanisms, and interoperability with existing FL protocols.

    “Integrating blockchain into an FL system requires significant development work and expertise. It requires smart contracts and consensus mechanisms, and interoperability with existing FL protocols.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased computational overhead in FL-chain could result in slower training speed, impact efficiency, and face scalability challenges.

    “This could result in a slower training speed, impact the efficiency of the system, and face scalability challenges.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The distributed nature of the system and collaboration at the tier level adds a privacy and security layer to the system.

    “The distributed nature of the system and collaboration at the tier level adds a privacy and security layer to the system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Computational complexity can impact the efficiency and speed of FL systems, especially during the training phase.

    “The computational complexity can impact the efficiency and speed of the FL systems, especially during the training phase.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The transparency offered by blockchain makes all transactions visible to all participants, enhancing trust and auditability but conflicting with privacy requirements in FL systems.

    “The transparency offered by blockchain makes all transactions visible to all participants in the network, which enhances trust and auditability but also conflicts with privacy requirements in FL systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Cryptographic algorithms and consensus mechanisms enhance security but come at a cost in terms of computational overhead.

    “Cryptographic algorithms and consensus mechanisms enhance the security feature, however, it comes at a cost in terms of computational overhead.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Hierarchical approaches have inherent strengths in decentralization and transparency because adding multiple edge servers and having a transparent grouping mechanism can make these approaches suitable for a large number of FL applications.

    “Hierarchical approaches have inherent strengths in terms of decentralization and transparency as adding multiple edge servers and having a transparent grouping mechanism can make these approaches suitable for a large number of FL applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    From a governance perspective, integrating blockchain in FL systems may require extensive coordination and agreement among participants, potentially slowing decision-making.

    “From a governance perspective, to integrate blockchain technology in FL systems, reaching consensus on system updates, protocol changes, or policy modifications may require extensive coordination and agreement among participants, potentially slowing down decision-making processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The complexity of the FL chain could increase development time and budget.

    “The complexity of the FL chain could increase development time and budget.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Incorporating blockchain into an FL system requires detailed design and integration, including developing smart contracts, defining consensus mechanisms, and ensuring compatibility with existing FL protocols.

    “Incorporating blockchain into an FL system requires detailed design and integration. Developing smart contracts, defining consensus mechanisms, and ensuring compatibility with the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Blockchain's decentralized architecture enhances security and transparency but comes at the cost of scalability.

    “Blockchain’s decentralized architecture enhances security and transparency. However, it comes at the cost of scalability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Governance and collaboration can be considered strengths of hierarchical systems because they provide a structural framework for managing and controlling data and grouping clients.

    “Governance and collaboration can be considered strengths of hierarchical systems as they provide a structural framework for managing and controlling data and grouping clients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Consensus on system updates, policy modifications, and protocol changes may require extensive coordination and agreement among participants, which may slow decision-making.

    “Consensus on system updates, policy modifications, and protocol changes may require extensive coordination and agreement among participants, which may slow down the decision-making process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    P2PS minimizes exposure of sensitive user data to third-party entities and reduces the risk of data breaches.

    “The exposure of sensitive user data to third-party entities and reduces the risk of data breaches is minimised.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The introduction of multiple edge servers introduces more vulnerable entities in the system where all participant information and data need to be secured.

    “The introduction of multiple edge servers introduces more vulnerable entities in the system where all participant information and data need to be secured.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The overhead of maintaining network connections increases and communication reliability decreases with a growing number of participants.

    “In addition, the overhead of maintaining network connections increases and communication reliability decreases with the growing number of participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Transmission of large model parameters among participants results in high network bandwidth and increases communication latency.

    “The transmission of large model parameters among participants results in high network bandwidth and increase communication latency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    As the number of participating clients increases, computational overhead and energy consumption at the cloud and edge servers increase but will not affect the clients.

    “However, as the number of participating clients increases computational overhead and energy consumption at the cloud and edge servers increase but will not affect the clients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some malicious participants might exploit vulnerabilities in the system to gain unauthorized access to sensitive user data or manipulate the learning process.

    “In addition, some malicious participants might try to exploit vulnerabilities in the system to gain unauthorized access to sensitive user data or manipulate the learning process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Managing large-scale FL systems with a massive number of participants can be difficult.

    “Although the P2PS is able to provide offer scalability as mentioned in the advantages, managing large-scale FL systems with a massive number of participants can be difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Due to decentralized mechanisms for resource discovery and P2P connections, it is difficult to discover available and suitable participants with the desired computational resources and challenging to identify capable and trustworthy participants.

    “Due to the decentralized mechanisms for resource discovery and P2P connections, it is difficult to discover available and suitable participants with the desired computational resources and it is challenging to identify capable and trustworthy participants in the learning process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In P2P FL systems, communication between participants and model updates could lead to overhead and high communication costs.

    “In P2P FL systems, The communication between participants and model updates could lead to overhead and high communication costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Governance and design complexity are considerable challenges in hierarchical systems because management of a large number of clients and servers and designing appropriate aggregation mechanisms are non-trivial.

    “However, governance and design complexity are considerable challenges in these systems as management of a large number of clients and servers and designing appropriate aggregation mechanisms are non-trivial in those cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    P2PS techniques utilize computing resources across multiple participants where each participant contributes its own processing power, which can significantly improve the overall computational capabilities of FL systems.

    “P2PS techniques utilize the computing resources across multiple participants where each participant contributes its own processing power, which can significantly improve the overall computational capabilities of the FL systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Due to the introduction of multiple tiers, the global model may take longer to converge.

    “Also, due to the introduction of multiple tiers, the global model may take longer to converge and this trade-off needs to be considered for systems requiring real-time task management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Direct communication among participants in P2PS architecture could bring security risks, such as an increased risk of data leakage and unauthorized access.

    “Direct communication among participants in P2PS architecture could bring security risks in the FL systems, such as an increased risk of data leakage and unauthorized access.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is very challenging to coordinate and synchronize model updates across numerous participants.

    “It is very challenging to coordinate and synchronize model updates across numerous participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    P2PS in FL allows direct communication between participants, bypassing the need for a central server, alleviating network congestion and reducing overall communication latency.

    “P2PS in FL allows for direct communication between participants, bypassing the need for a central server. By doing so, the P2PS is able to alleviate network congestion and reduce the overall communication latency in the system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    P2PS reduces the impact of individual failures, making FL systems resilient.

    “Additionally, P2PS reduces the impact of individual failures which makes the FL systems resilient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Energy efficiency is achieved by local processing, but complex models can consume more energy.

    “Energy efficiency is achieved by local processing, but complex models can consume more energy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    They explore techniques that can provide strong privacy guarantees while maintaining acceptable levels of model accuracy and performance.

    “They explore techniques that can provide strong privacy guarantees while still maintaining acceptable levels of model accuracy and performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Heterogeneity among devices caused by variations in hardware and software can complicate optimization and compatibility.

    “Heterogeneity among devices caused by variations in hardware and software can complicate optimization and compatibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Network bandwidth and latency could hassle data synchronization and model updates.

    “Network bandwidth and latency could hassle data synchronization and model updates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Transferring large model parameters across participants can consume significant network bandwidth and increase latency.

    “Transferring large model parameters across participants can consume significant network bandwidth and increase latency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These approaches strive for compatibility and interoperability with existing FL frameworks and infrastructures and encourage continuous improvement and innovation in privacy protection.

    “These approaches strive for compatibility and interoperability with existing FL frameworks and infrastructures and encourage continuous improvement and innovation in privacy protection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Due to the distributed architecture, scalability can be achieved, allowing for larger datasets and improved model performance.

    “Additionally, due to the distributed architecture, scalability can be achieved, allowing for larger datasets and improved model performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches try to leverage their strengths and compensate for their weaknesses to provide a more comprehensive and robust privacy framework.

    “Mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches try to leverage their strengths and compensate for their weaknesses so as to provide a more comprehensive and robust privacy framework.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    P2P allows participants to directly share model updates, which results in trust concerns.

    “However, P2P allows participants directly share model updates, which results in trust concerns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    They improve the resilience of the FL system against various privacy attacks by integrating multiple techniques.

    “In addition, they improve the resilience of the FL system against various privacy attacks by integrating multiple techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    P2PS provides scalability by distributing computational tasks among participants, but it is difficult to coordinate and synchronize the learning process as the number of participants increases.

    “P2PS provides scalability by distributing computational tasks among participants, it is difficult to coordinate and synchronize the learning process as the number of participants increases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    With the lack of centralized control, P2PS could introduce security risks.

    “With the lack of centralized control, the P2PS could introduce security risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The specific strengths and effectiveness of mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches depend on the selection and combination of techniques, as well as their proper implementation and configurations.

    “It’s worth noting that the specific strengths and effectiveness of mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches depend on the selection and combination of techniques, as well as their proper implementation and configurations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    They provide flexibility and adaptability to accommodate diverse privacy requirements and system constraints.

    “They also provide flexibility and adaptability to accommodate diverse privacy requirements and system constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Scalability could be affected due to heterogeneity among various types of edge devices, requiring additional efforts for compatibility.

    “Scalability could be affected due to heterogeneity among various types of edge devices, which requires additional efforts for compatibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Model complexity and training capabilities are restricted due to the limited computational resources provided by edge devices.

    “The model complexity and training capabilities are restricted due to the limited computational resources provided by the edge devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Security could set the alarm due to the vulnerability of edge devices, requiring robust security measures which governance is not provided by edge devices.

    “Security could set the alarm due to the vulnerability of edge devices, requiring robust security measures which governance is not provided by edge devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As data distribution and quality may vary among devices, privacy preservation can affect model performance, potentially impacting model generalization.

    “As data distribution and quality may vary among devices, privacy preservation can affect model performance, potentially impacting model generalization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Model performance could be affected by data imbalance among distributed datasets.

    “Model performance could be affected by the data imbalance among the distributed datasets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Transmitting only model updates and aggregated results reduces communication costs, saves network resources and minimizes latency.

    “Via this technique, transmitting only model updates and aggregated results reduces communication costs, saves network resources and minimizes latency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Limited computational resources on edge devices could compromise model accuracy.

    “The limited computational resources on edge devices could compromise model accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These approaches allow for fine-grained privacy control over different aspects of the FL process.

    “These approaches allow for fine-grained privacy control over different aspects of the FL process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The decentralized architecture of intelligence on edge devices ensures preserving data confidentiality and compliance with regulations.

    “Its decentralized architecture ensures preserving data confidentiality and compliance with regulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The first and most important strength of adopting intelligence on edge devices in FL systems lies in privacy enhancement.

    “The first and most important strength of adopting intelligence on edge devices in FL systems lies in privacy enhancement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The integration of multiple privacy techniques may introduce new attack vectors or vulnerabilities and require fine-tuning of various configuration parameters.

    “The integration of multiple privacy techniques may introduce new attack vectors or vulnerabilities and require fine-tuning of various configuration parameters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The combination of privacy techniques may introduce a trade-off between privacy protection and model utility.

    “The combination of privacy techniques may introduce a trade-off between privacy protection and model utility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The field of privacy enhancement technology in FL is still evolving, and standardization is limited.

    “The field of privacy enhancement technology in FL is still evolving, and standardization is limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    DP provides data privacy by introducing noise that adversely affects the prediction accuracy of ML algorithms used in FL systems.

    “As discussed before, the differential privacy technique provides data privacy by introducing noise that adversely affects the prediction accuracy of the ML algorithms used in FL systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    HE is very effective for FL privacy preservation because most operations required by FL systems, such as aggregation, model updates, and gradient calculations, can be performed without accessing raw data.

    “This approach is very effective for FL privacy preservation as most of the operations required by the FL systems like aggregation, model updates, and gradient calculations can be performed without accessing the raw data [34,35,36,37,38].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [34] Xie, 2020, Federated Diabetes Mellitus Analysis via Homomorphic Encryption, Proc. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. IOP Publ. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35] Gandhi, N., Mishra, S., Bharti, S.K., and Bhagat, K. (2021, January 9–11). Leveraging towards Privacy-preserving using Federated Machine Learning for Healthcare Systems. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), Bangalore, India. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] Ji, J., Yan, D., and Mu, Z. (2022, January 15–17). Personnel status detection model suitable for vertical federated learning structure. Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing, Haikou, China. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] Ma, 2021, Pocket diagnosis: Secure federated learning against poisoning attack in the cloud, IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [38] Hao, M., Li, H., Xu, G., Liu, Z., and Chen, Z. (2020, January 7–11). Privacy-aware and resource-saving collaborative learning for healthcare in cloud computing. Proceedings of the ICC 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, Ireland. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Existing aggregation techniques for FL, such as FedAvg, use randomized approaches to achieve differential privacy, but their performance may deteriorate in the presence of adversarial attacks.

    “The basis existing aggregation techniques for FL, such as the Federated Averaging Algorithm (FedAvg), use randomized approaches to achieve differential privacy, but their performance may deteriorate in the presence of adversarial attacks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Integrating multiple privacy techniques in a mixed or hybrid approach can increase the complexity of the FL system.

    “However, integrating multiple privacy techniques in a mixed or hybrid approach can increase the complexity of the FL system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Privacy techniques such as encryption, secure multiparty computation, or differential privacy can introduce computational complexity and communication requirements.

    “Privacy techniques such as encryption, secure multiparty computation, or differential privacy can introduce computational complexity and communication requirements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Combining different privacy techniques may introduce compatibility and interoperability challenges.

    “In addition, combining different privacy techniques may introduce compatibility and interoperability challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    DP involves evaluations of privacy guarantees and existing privacy evaluation metrics are not designed for distributed systems like FL.

    “DP involves evaluations of privacy guarantees and the existing privacy evaluation metrics are not designed for distributed systems like FL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Trade-offs arise due to the combination of different techniques and the complexity of integrating them, including Complexity vs. Effectiveness, Privacy vs. Utility, Performance vs. Privacy, Compatibility and Interoperability vs. Customization, Security vs. Complexity, Standardization vs. Flexibility.

    “Thus, the trade-offs arise due to the combination of different techniques and the complexity of integrating them, including Complexity vs. Effectiveness, Privacy vs. Utility, Performance vs. Privacy, Compatibility and Interoperability vs. Customization, Security vs. Complexity, Standardization vs. Flexibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Homomorphic encryption can be computationally expensive, and performing computations on encrypted data requires significant computational resources.

    “Homomorphic encryption can be computationally expensive, and performing computations on encrypted data requires significant computational resources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The evolving blockchain technology creates the concept of a token economy where community revenue can be allocated to users who create value.

    “The evolving blockchain technology creates the concept of a token economy where the community’s revenue can be allocated to the users who create value in the system [69].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [69] Lee, 2019, A decentralized token economy: How blockchain and cryptocurrency can revolutionize business, Bus. Horizons source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    HE provides a relevant and suitable option for FL systems because even cloud or edge servers performing aggregation cannot access the data and only clients have access to raw data.

    “This encryption method provides a very relevant and suitable option for FL systems as even the cloud or edge servers performing the aggregation processes cannot access the data and only clients have access to the raw data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The combined technologies of FL and blockchain effectively enhance privacy, security, transparency, collaboration, and governance.

    “The combined technologies effectively enhance privacy, security, transparency, collaboration, and governance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    These approaches all require the second privacy-enhancing technique.

    “These approaches all require the second privacy-enhancing technique.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In a decentralized environment, blockchain enables a secure and tamper-proof process for data sharing and computation using encrypted public keys.

    “In the decentralized environment, blockchain enables the secure and tamper-proof process for data sharing and computation using encrypted public keys.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Therefore participants' data at the local level are better protected in terms of privacy and security.

    “Therefore the participants’ data at the local level are better protected in terms of privacy and security.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intelligence on edge devices in FL systems brings effectiveness through improved privacy protection, enhanced data security, scalability, reduced network latency, real-time decision-making, fault tolerance and resource efficiency.

    “Intelligence on the edge devices in FL systems brings effectiveness through improved privacy protection, enhanced data security, scalability, reduced network latency, real-time decision-making, fault tolerance and resource efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Errors occurring in data transmission or training outcomes can erode the trust in the FL system.

    “Lastly, errors occurring in data transmission or training outcomes can erode the trust in the FL system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches can be utilized in FL systems where complementary privacy techniques, fine-grained privacy control, balancing privacy and utility, flexibility and adaptability, robust defence against attacks, and compatibility and interoperability are needed.

    “While the mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches can be utilized in FL systems where complementary privacy techniques, fine-grained privacy control, balancing privacy and utility, flexibility and adaptability, robust defence against attacks, and compatibility and interoperability are needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    During the aggregation and transmission phases, sensitive patient data face the risks of data breaches, unauthorized access, identity theft, or even malicious modification.

    “During the aggregation and transmission phases, sensitive patient data face the risks of data breaches, unauthorized access, identity theft, or even malicious modification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Patient data is sensitive, confidential and private.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Approaches like DP and HE provide significant privacy enhancements but add computational and governance overhead.

    “Approaches like DP and HE provide significant privacy enhancements but add computational and governance overhead.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    P2PS can be used in FL systems where distributed computing power, scalability, privacy, fault tolerance, and geographical distribution are required.

    “The P2PS can be used in FL systems where distributed computing power, scalability, privacy, fault tolerance, and geographical distribution are required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Evaluating the effectiveness and security of mixed approaches is challenging as they may require specialized evaluation methodologies and benchmarks.

    “Evaluating the effectiveness and security of these approaches is challenging as they may require specialized evaluation methodologies and benchmarks to assess their impact on privacy, utility, and overall system performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The inherent characteristics of FL architecture and additional privacy enhancement techniques still leave the intelligence builder facing ethical challenges.

    “Although the inherent characteristics of FL architecture and additional privacy enhancement techniques, this intelligence builder faces ethical challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    More decentralized approaches like blockchain and P2PS provide robustness, scalability and fault tolerance with limited privacy guarantees.

    “On the other hand, more decentralized approaches like blockchain and P2PS provide robustness, scalability and fault tolerance with limited privacy guarantees.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The effectiveness of mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches to privacy enhancement in an FL system depends on several factors, including the specific techniques employed, the nature of the data, and the use case.

    “The effectiveness of mixed, hybrid, and miscellaneous approaches to privacy enhancement technology in an FL system depends on several factors, including the specific techniques employed, the nature of the data, and the use case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Biased data could affect FL training outcomes.

    “Furthermore, biased data could affect FL training outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    FL opens further opportunities in novel research and business avenues by providing security and privacy for user data.

    “FL opens further opportunities in the novel research and business avenues by providing security and privacy for user data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    FL streamlines the healthcare process and improves healthcare decisions and diagnoses.

    “This streamlines the healthcare process and improves healthcare decisions and diagnoses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mixed approaches can contribute to improved data confidentiality by encrypting data or performing computations without exposing raw data, and can reduce the risk of data leakage or unauthorized access.

    “These approaches can contribute to improved data confidentiality by encrypting data or performing computations without exposing the raw data, these approaches can reduce the risk of data leakage or unauthorized access.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The underlying decentralized architecture for P2PS in FL is a complex and dynamic process.

    “In addition, although the decentralized architecture for P2PS in FL is very important, the underlying architecture is a complex and dynamic process that needs to be optimized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intelligence on the edge device can play a big role in improving privacy and efficiency in FL.

    “To summarise, we emphasise that intelligence on the edge device can play a big role in improving privacy and efficiency in FL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mixed approaches allow for optimizing the trade-off between privacy and utility in FL, ensuring that privacy enhancement does not compromise effectiveness and utility.

    “They allow for optimizing the trade-off between privacy and utility in FL, ensuring that privacy enhancement does not compromise the effectiveness and utility of the FL system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The implications of using P2PS technology in FL highlight the potential for improved privacy, enhanced collaboration, and distributed computing power.

    “The implications of using P2PS technology in FL highlight the potential for improved privacy, enhanced collaboration, and distributed computing power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    P2PS is able to provide high privacy guarantees, improved data availability, distributed computing power, geographic distribution, collaborative learning, better scalability, and increased fault tolerance.

    “P2PS is able to provide high privacy guarantees, improved data availability, distributed computing power, geographic distribution, collaborative learning, better scalability, and increased fault tolerance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The innovative FL applications in healthcare systems are still at a very early stage.

    “The innovative FL applications in healthcare systems are still at a very early stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Intelligence on edge devices can be applied in FL systems where privacy, reduced communication, real-time processing, robustness, energy efficiency, and scalability are critical factors.

    “For intelligence on edge devices, they can be applied in FL systems where privacy, reduced communication, real-time processing, robustness, energy efficiency, and scalability are critical factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Consensus mechanisms are a suitable solution for the P2PS network to reach agreement on data or models.

    “Besides, consensus mechanisms are a suitable solution for the P2PS network to reach agreement on data or models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While mixed approaches offer the potential for improved privacy protection, their effectiveness can vary.

    “While these approaches offer the potential for improved privacy protection, their effectiveness can vary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The effectiveness of P2PS technology in an FL system depends on the specific implementation, network characteristics, security measures, and governance mechanisms in place.

    “The effectiveness of P2PS technology in an FL system depends on the specific implementation, network characteristics, security measures, and governance mechanisms in place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The integration of multiple privacy techniques could increase computational complexity, interoperability, and standardization challenges.

    “However, the integration of multiple privacy techniques could increase computational complexity, interoperability, and standardization challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Intelligence on edge devices in FL systems holds significant relevance in various contexts and domains, including scalability, real-time processing, bandwidth optimization, energy efficiency, and offline functionality.

    “Besides privacy enhancement, intelligence on edge devices in FL systems holds significant relevance in various contexts and domains, including but not limited to scalability, real-time processing, bandwidth optimization, energy efficiency, and offline functionality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
150 of 150
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 40 articles identified through the Scopus search are representative of the existing privacy enhancement methods for federated learning in healthcare systems.

    “As a result, 40 relevant articles were identified and included in this review.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The seven categories used to classify the selected papers are exhaustive and mutually exclusive for privacy enhancement methods in federated learning healthcare.

    “the selected papers can be categorised into the following major areas based on the principle approach used for providing security and privacy to the FL system:Differential PrivacyHomomorphic EncryptionBlockchainHierarchical ApproachesPeer-to-Peer SharingIntelligence on the Edge DevicesMixed, Hybrid and Miscellaneous Approaches”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of a comprehensive survey on privacy enhancement methods in FL in healthcare systems.

    “Given the lack of a comprehensive survey on the privacy enhancement methods in FL in healthcare systems, our review provides a detailed discussion and analysis in seven main areas: Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Blockchain, Hierarchical Approaches, Peer to Peer Sharing, Intelligence on the Edge Device, and Mixed, Hybrid and Miscellaneous Approaches.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Blockchain technology provides a high level of security.

    “Although blockchain technology provides a high level of security, it is not inherently protected.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patient data is sensitive, confidential and private.

    “In light of its highly personal nature, patient data is considered sensitive, confidential and private.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These security enhancements minimize the risk of data violations and ensure compliance with regulations, thus promoting safer, privacy-preserving analysis in healthcare.

    “These security enhancements minimize the risk of data violations and ensure compliance with regulations, thus promoting safer, privacy-preserving analysis in healthcare [107].”

    From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [107]

    Section 4.3 says combined privacy techniques can reduce data leakage and unauthorized access and can be tailored to regulatory compliance needs. It does not say these enhancements ensure regulatory compliance; the Conclusions also note that healthcare federated learning continues to face breach risks and requires governance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Federated learning models, assembled with encryption and differential privacy approaches, offer a secure framework for data analysis in smart health systems.

    “FL models, assembled with encryption and differential privacy approaches, offer a secure framework for data analysis in smart health systems.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reference [11] is identified as a smart-healthcare survey but lists a different title

    Minor

    The text describes [11] as a survey of federated learning in smart healthcare, whereas reference [11] is titled as a survey of blockchain and federated learning in edge computing. The reference list separately contains a smart-healthcare survey by Nguyen et al. at [16].

  • Smart contracts are attributed to only one reviewed work, but another is described as using them

    Minor

    The paper says only work [68] mentions smart contracts, but its description of work [44] explicitly says that patients grant access through smart contracts.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kumar, Y., and Singla, R. (2021). Federated Learning Systems: Towards Next-Generation AI, Springer.
  2. Chowdhury, A., Kassem, H., Padoy, N., Umeton, R., and Karargyris, A. (2022). Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop, BrainLes 2021, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2021, Virtual Event, 27 September 2021, Springer. Revised Selected Papers, Part I.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, X., Sabrina, F., Fan, Z., & Sohail, S.
Affiliations
  • School of Information Technology, King’s Own Institute, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • Huaqiao University (CN)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Fan, Zongwen
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-08-07
Volume
20
Issue
15
Pages
6539
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385636378
Cited by
139
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 7
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Strong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
federated learning, privacy preservation, healthcare data privacy, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, blockchain, Internet of Medical Things, electronic health records, edge computing, peer-to-peer sharing
MeSH terms
Blockchain, Computer Communication Networks, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Privacy, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review