Cited by 29Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Software-Defined Networks and 5GAdvanced Optical Network Technologies

Resource Reservation in Sliced Networks: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Approach

Open access
Barnard, Pieter, Macaluso, Irene, Marchetti, Nicola, DaSilva, Luiz A.·2022·ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications

Abstract

The growing complexity of wireless networks has sparked an upsurge in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) within the telecommunication industry in recent years. In network slicing, a key component of 5G that enables network operators to lease their resources to third-party tenants, AI models may be employed in complex tasks, such as short-term resource reservation (STRR). When AI is used to make complex resource management decisions with financial and service quality implications, it is important that these decisions be understood by a human-in-the-loop. In this paper, we apply state-of-the-art techniques from the field of Explainable AI (XAI) to the problem of STRR. Using real-world data to develop an AI model for STRR, we demonstrate how our XAI methodology can be used to explain the real-time decisions of the model, to reveal trends about the model’s general behaviour, as well as aid in the diagnosis of potential faults during the model’s development. In addition, we quantitatively validate the faithfulness of the explanations across an extensive range of XAI metrics to ensure they remain trustworthy and actionable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icc45855.2022.9838766

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method is particularly effective for feature selection, as it assigns importance values to each feature based on their contribution to the model's predictions, allowing for the exclusion of less significant features without sacrificing performance.

    “The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method is particularly effective for feature selection, as it assigns importance values to each feature based on their contribution to the model's predictions, allowing for the exclusion of less significant features without sacrificing performance [20].”

    From Explainable AI-Aided Feature Selection and Model Reduction for DRL-Based V2X Resource Allocation (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. A. Adams and P. Vamplew, "Encoding and decoding cyclic data," The South Pacific Journal of Natural Science, vol. 16, 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnard, P., Macaluso, I., Marchetti, N., & DaSilva, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Trinity College,Connect Research Centre,Dublin,Ireland
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-05-16
Pages
1530-1535
ISSN
1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4290996367
Cited by
29
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Optical Network Technologies
Keywords
network slicing, resource reservation, explainable AI, 5G, wireless resource management, model interpretability, explanation fidelity, human-in-the-loop decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review