Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Flash correct-and-refresh: Retention-aware error management for increased flash memory lifetime

Open access
Cai, Yu, Yalcin, Gulay, Mutlu, Onur, Haratsch, Erich F., Cristal, Adrian, Unsal, Osman S., Mai, Ken·2012·2012 IEEE 30th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)

Abstract

With the continued scaling of NAND flash and multi-level cell technology, flash-based storage has gained widespread use in systems ranging from mobile platforms to enterprise servers. However, the robustness of NAND flash cells is an increasing concern, especially at nanometer-regime process geometries. NAND flash memory bit error rate increases exponentially with the number of program/erase cycles. Stronger error correcting codes (ECC) can be used to tolerate higher error rates, but these have diminishing returns with increasing P/E cycles and can have prohibitively high power, area, and latency overheads. The goal of this paper is to develop new techniques that can tolerate high bit error rates without requiring prohibitively strong ECC. Our techniques, called Flash Correct-and-Refresh (FCR) exploit the observation that the dominant error source in NAND flash memory is retention errors, caused by flash cells losing charge over time. The key idea is to periodically read, correct, and reprogram (in-place) or remap the stored data before it accumulates more retention errors than can be corrected by simple ECC. Detailed simulations of a solid-state drive (SSD) storage system driven by measured experimental data from error characterization on real flash memory chips show that our techniques provide 46× average lifetime improvement on a variety of workloads at no additional hardware cost. We also find that our techniques achieve lifetime improvements that cannot feasibly be achieved with stronger ECC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccd.2012.6378623

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 0, Iotta Repository
  2. liu, 2012, RAIDR: Retention-Aware Intelligent DRAM Refresh, ISCA
  3. katcher, 1997, Postmark A New File System Benchmark Technical Report
  4. siewiorek, 2000, Reliable Computer Systems Design and Evaluation
  5. 0, UMass Trace
  6. 10.1145/1815961.1815973 · doi:10.1145/1815961.1815973
  7. bucy, 2008, DiskSim Simulation Environment Reference Manual
  8. 0, Iozone Filesystem Benchmark
  9. 10.1109/JSSC.2008.917558 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2008.917558
  10. 10.1109/HPCA.2012.6168954 · doi:10.1109/hpca.2012.6168954
  11. lin, 2004, Error Control Coding
  12. 10.1109/IEDM.2007.4418892 · doi:10.1109/iedm.2007.4418892
  13. suh, 1995, A 3.3 V 32 Mb NAND flash memory with incremental step pulse programming scheme, JSSC
  14. 10.1109/TVLSI.2009.2015666 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2009.2015666
  15. 0, Open Source Software at HP Labs
  16. yasarapu, 2011, Architectural Requirements for MLC based SSDs, FMS
  17. 10.1109/IMW.2009.5090600 · doi:10.1109/imw.2009.5090600
  18. 10.1109/FCCM.2011.28 · doi:10.1109/fccm.2011.28
  19. abraham, 2010, NAND Flash Trends for SSD Enterprise, FMS
  20. 10.1109/RELPHY.2008.4558857 · DOI
  21. cai, 2012, Error Patterns in MLC NAND Flash Memory: Measurement, Characterization and Analysis, DATE
  22. 10.1109/ISSCC.2012.6177075 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2012.6177075
  23. agrawal, 2008, Design Tradeoffs for SSD Performance, USENIX
  24. 10.1109/ISSCC.2011.5746283 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2011.5746283

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Cai, Y., Yalcin, G., Mutlu, O., Haratsch, E. F., Cristal, A., Unsal, O. S., & Mai, K.
Venue
2012 IEEE 30th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-09
Pages
94-101
ISSN
1063-6404 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010390358
Cited by
241
References
0
FWCI
12.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flash correct-and-refresh: Retention-aware error management for increased flash memory lifetime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccd.2012.6378623
The paper
Cai, Y., Yalcin, G., Mutlu, O., Haratsch, E. F., Cristal, A., Unsal, O. S., & Mai, K. (2012). Flash correct-and-refresh: Retention-aware error management for increased flash memory lifetime. 2012 IEEE 30th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccd.2012.6378623

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.