The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flash correct-and-refresh: Retention-aware error management for increased flash memory lifetime
Open accessAbstract
With the continued scaling of NAND flash and multi-level cell technology, flash-based storage has gained widespread use in systems ranging from mobile platforms to enterprise servers. However, the robustness of NAND flash cells is an increasing concern, especially at nanometer-regime process geometries. NAND flash memory bit error rate increases exponentially with the number of program/erase cycles. Stronger error correcting codes (ECC) can be used to tolerate higher error rates, but these have diminishing returns with increasing P/E cycles and can have prohibitively high power, area, and latency overheads. The goal of this paper is to develop new techniques that can tolerate high bit error rates without requiring prohibitively strong ECC. Our techniques, called Flash Correct-and-Refresh (FCR) exploit the observation that the dominant error source in NAND flash memory is retention errors, caused by flash cells losing charge over time. The key idea is to periodically read, correct, and reprogram (in-place) or remap the stored data before it accumulates more retention errors than can be corrected by simple ECC. Detailed simulations of a solid-state drive (SSD) storage system driven by measured experimental data from error characterization on real flash memory chips show that our techniques provide 46× average lifetime improvement on a variety of workloads at no additional hardware cost. We also find that our techniques achieve lifetime improvements that cannot feasibly be achieved with stronger ECC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 0, Iotta Repository
- liu, 2012, RAIDR: Retention-Aware Intelligent DRAM Refresh, ISCA
- katcher, 1997, Postmark A New File System Benchmark Technical Report
- siewiorek, 2000, Reliable Computer Systems Design and Evaluation
- 0, UMass Trace
- 10.1145/1815961.1815973 · doi:10.1145/1815961.1815973
- bucy, 2008, DiskSim Simulation Environment Reference Manual
- 0, Iozone Filesystem Benchmark
- 10.1109/JSSC.2008.917558 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2008.917558
- 10.1109/HPCA.2012.6168954 · doi:10.1109/hpca.2012.6168954
- lin, 2004, Error Control Coding
- 10.1109/IEDM.2007.4418892 · doi:10.1109/iedm.2007.4418892
- suh, 1995, A 3.3 V 32 Mb NAND flash memory with incremental step pulse programming scheme, JSSC
- 10.1109/TVLSI.2009.2015666 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2009.2015666
- 0, Open Source Software at HP Labs
- yasarapu, 2011, Architectural Requirements for MLC based SSDs, FMS
- 10.1109/IMW.2009.5090600 · doi:10.1109/imw.2009.5090600
- 10.1109/FCCM.2011.28 · doi:10.1109/fccm.2011.28
- abraham, 2010, NAND Flash Trends for SSD Enterprise, FMS
- 10.1109/RELPHY.2008.4558857 · DOI
- cai, 2012, Error Patterns in MLC NAND Flash Memory: Measurement, Characterization and Analysis, DATE
- 10.1109/ISSCC.2012.6177075 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2012.6177075
- agrawal, 2008, Design Tradeoffs for SSD Performance, USENIX
- 10.1109/ISSCC.2011.5746283 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2011.5746283
Cited by
Data retention in MLC NAND flash memory: Characterization, optimization, and recovery
Cai, Y., Luo, Y., Haratsch, E. F., Mai, K., & Mutlu, O. (2015) · 2015 IEEE 21st International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca.2015.7056062 · Cited by 274
Self-citationMemory scaling: A systems architecture perspective
Mutlu, O. (2013) · 2013 5th IEEE International Memory Workshop · doi:10.1109/imw.2013.6582088 · Cited by 256
Self-citationReliability of SSDs in Enterprise Storage Systems: A Large-Scale Field Study
Maneas, S., Mahdaviani, K., Emami, T., & Schroeder, B. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Storage · doi:10.1145/3423088 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Cai, Y., Yalcin, G., Mutlu, O., Haratsch, E. F., Cristal, A., Unsal, O. S., & Mai, K.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE 30th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-09
- Pages
- 94-101
- ISSN
- 1063-6404 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010390358
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flash correct-and-refresh: Retention-aware error management for increased flash memory lifetime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccd.2012.6378623
- The paper
- Cai, Y., Yalcin, G., Mutlu, O., Haratsch, E. F., Cristal, A., Unsal, O. S., & Mai, K. (2012). Flash correct-and-refresh: Retention-aware error management for increased flash memory lifetime. 2012 IEEE 30th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccd.2012.6378623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.