Cited by 76Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareOvarian function and disordersData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of PCOS

Chauhan, Preeti, Patil, Pooja, Rane, Neha, Raundale, Pooja, Kanakia, Harshil·2021·2021 International Conference on Communication information and Computing Technology (ICCICT)

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder affecting many women in their child-bearing age groups. It leads to sterility and various kinds of disorders in women. The main signs of this disease are uneven mensuration cycle, obesity, oily skin, pimples, anxiety disorders. An estimated one in five women suffers from PCOS. It is seen that most women overlook the common indication of PCOS and visit the doctor only when they face difficulty conceiving. If not diagnosed in time, the condition can cause serious health issues. To overcome this problem this paper proposes to develop an application for the early prediction of PCOS using Machine Learning techniques. The required dataset is created by carrying a survey and is cleaned using Python and Google Colab. Gini importance is used to compute feature importance. Classification of PCOS is done using various machine learning techniques such as K-Nearest Neighbor(KNN), Naive Bayes, Decision Tree Classifier, Support Vector Machine(SVM), Logistic Regression(LR). Based on the accuracy and confusion matrix, the Decision Tree Classifier was found to be the most accurate model for PCOS prediction. A mobile application was developed which helps the user to predict PCOS at an early stage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccict50803.2021.9510128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most machine learning studies were published in 2023 (n = 5), while two were published in 2022, and one each in 2021 and 2020.

    “Most of them were published in 2023 (n = 5) [63,64,65,76,87], while two were published in 2022 [88,89], and one each in 2021 [66] and 2020 [67].”
  • When machine learning was tested for PCOS diagnosis prediction, the reported accuracy varied between 81% and 100%.

    “When machine learning was tested for PCOS diagnosis prediction, the reported accuracy varied between 81% [66] and 100% [88].”
  • Nine included studies mention the use of machine learning.

    “Nine included studies mention the use of machine learning [63,64,65,66,67,76,87,88,89] (Supplementary File S3).”
  • The majority of machine learning studies originated from India (n = 5), while three originated from the USA, and one from New Zealand.

    “The majority of these studies originated from India (n = 5) [63,64,65,66,88], while three originated from the USA (n = 3) [67,87,89], and one from New Zealand [76].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chauhan, P., Patil, P., Rane, N., Raundale, P., & Kanakia, H.
Venue
2021 International Conference on Communication information and Computing Technology (ICCICT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06-25
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W4231003958
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 5
FWCI
9.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Communication Information and Computing Technology (ICCICT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS prediction, early diagnosis, machine learning classification, decision tree classification, Gini importance, feature importance, mobile health apps, infertility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review