The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Object recognition with informative features and linear classification
Abstract
We show that efficient object recognition can be obtained by combining informative features with linear classification. The results demonstrate the superiority of informative class-specific features, as compared with generic type features such as wavelets, for the task of object recognition. We show that information rich features can reach optimal performance with simple linear separation rules, while generic feature based classifiers require more complex classification schemes. This is significant because efficient and optimal methods have been developed for spaces that allow linear separation. To compare different strategies for feature extraction, we trained and compared classifiers working in feature spaces of the same low dimensionality, using two feature types (image fragments vs. wavelets) and two classification rules (linear hyperplane and a Bayesian network). The results show that by maximizing the individual information of the features, it is possible to obtain efficient classification by a simple linear separating rule, as well as more efficient learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Friedman, N., Geiger, D., & Goldszmidt, M. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007465528199 · Cited by 4,742
Neural network-based face detection
Rowley, H. A., Baluja, S., & Kanade, T. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.655647 · Cited by 3,554
Cited by
Feature Selection: A Data Perspective
Li, J., Cheng, K., Wang, S., Morstatter, F., Trevino, R. P., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3136625 · Cited by 2,442
A review of feature selection methods based on mutual information
Vergara, J. R., & Estévez, P. A. (2014) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-013-1368-0 · Cited by 1,255
Feature selection using Joint Mutual Information Maximisation
Bennasar, M., Hicks, Y., & Setchi, R. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.007 · Cited by 659
Learning Compact Binary Descriptors with Unsupervised Deep Neural Networks
Lin, K., Lu, J., Chen, C.-S., & Zhou, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.133 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Vidal-Naquet, & Ullman
- Venue
- Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 281-288 vol.1
- OpenAlex
- W3144510026
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Object recognition with informative features and linear classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2003.1238356
- The paper
- Vidal-Naquet, & Ullman. (2003). Object recognition with informative features and linear classification. Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2003.1238356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.