The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Object categorization by learned universal visual dictionary
Abstract
This paper presents a new algorithm for the automatic recognition of object classes from images (categorization). Compact and yet discriminative appearance-based object class models are automatically learned from a set of training images. The method is simple and extremely fast, making it suitable for many applications such as semantic image retrieval, Web search, and interactive image editing. It classifies a region according to the proportions of different visual words (clusters in feature space). The specific visual words and the typical proportions in each object are learned from a segmented training set. The main contribution of this paper is twofold: i) an optimally compact visual dictionary is learned by pair-wise merging of visual words from an initially large dictionary. The final visual words are described by GMMs. ii) A novel statistical measure of discrimination is proposed which is optimized by each merge operation. High classification accuracy is demonstrated for nine object classes on photographs of real objects viewed under general lighting conditions, poses and viewpoints. The set of test images used for validation comprise: i) photographs acquired by us, ii) images from the Web and iii) images from the recently released Pascal dataset. The proposed algorithm performs well on both texture-rich objects (e.g. grass, sky, trees) and structure-rich ones (e.g. cars, bikes, planes)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The information bottleneck method
Tishby, N., Pereira, F. C., & Bialek, W. (2000) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0004057 · Cited by 2,626 · cited 1×
“As we are compressing the histogram whilst preserving meaningful information about the class labels, our approach can be considered as an application of the information bottleneck method [13] to the problem of object categorization.”
Method
Cited by
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Random Walks for Image Segmentation
Grady, L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.233 · Cited by 2,624
Torralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440
Fisher Kernels on Visual Vocabularies for Image Categorization
Perronnin, F., & Dance, C. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383266 · Cited by 1,641
Aggregating Local Image Descriptors into Compact Codes
Jegou, H., Perronnin, F., Douze, M., Sanchez, J., Perez, P., & Schmid, C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.235 · Cited by 1,503
Metadata
- Authors
- Winn, J., Criminisi, A., & Minka, T.
- Venue
- Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 1800-1807 Vol. 2
- OpenAlex
- W2141303268
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Object categorization by learned universal visual dictionary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2005.171
- The paper
- Winn, J., Criminisi, A., & Minka, T. (2005). Object categorization by learned universal visual dictionary. Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2005.171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.