The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creating efficient codebooks for visual recognition
Open accessAbstract
Visual codebook based quantization of robust appearance descriptors extracted from local image patches is an effective means of capturing image statistics for texture analysis and scene classification. Codebooks are usually constructed by using a method such as k-means to cluster the descriptor vectors of patches sampled either densely ('textons') or sparsely ('bags of features' based on key-points or salience measures) from a set of training images. This works well for texture analysis in homogeneous images, but the images that arise in natural object recognition tasks have far less uniform statistics. We show that for dense sampling, k-means over-adapts to this, clustering centres almost exclusively around the densest few regions in descriptor space and thus failing to code other informative regions. This gives suboptimal codes that are no better than using randomly selected centres. We describe a scalable acceptance-radius based clusterer that generates better codebooks and study its performance on several image classification tasks. We also show that dense representations outperform equivalent keypoint based ones on these tasks and that SVM or mutual information based feature selection starting from a dense codebook further improves the performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions
Julesz, B. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/290091a0 · Cited by 1,703 · cited 1×
“[13]) we mean a set of representative classes of image patches that suffice to characterize an image object or texture.”
Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials Using Three-Dimensional Textons
Leung, T., & Malik, J. (2001) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1011126920638 · Cited by 1,498 · cited 4×
“[18] use Gabor texture features for texture classification.”
Influential
Cited by
Locality-constrained Linear Coding for image classification
Wang, J., Yang, J., Yu, K., Lv, F., Huang, T., & Gong, Y. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540018 · Cited by 3,100
Zhang, J., Marszałek, M., Lazebnik, S., & Schmid, C. (2007) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-9794-4 · Cited by 1,923
Fisher Kernels on Visual Vocabularies for Image Categorization
Perronnin, F., & Dance, C. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383266 · Cited by 1,641
Understanding bag-of-words model: a statistical framework
Zhang, Y., Jin, R., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2010) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-010-0001-0 · Cited by 1,384
Sampling Strategies for Bag-of-Features Image Classification
Nowak, E., Jurie, F., & Triggs, B. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744085_38 · Cited by 927
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurie, F., & Triggs, B.
- Venue
- Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 604-610 Vol. 1
- OpenAlex
- W2151259137
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.75
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creating efficient codebooks for visual recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2005.66
- The paper
- Jurie, F., & Triggs, B. (2005). Creating efficient codebooks for visual recognition. Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2005.66
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.