The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coupled Detection and Trajectory Estimation for Multi-Object Tracking
Abstract
We present a novel approach for multi-object tracking which considers object detection and spacetime trajectory estimation as a coupled optimization problem. It is formulated in a hypothesis selection framework and builds upon a state-of-the-art pedestrian detector. At each time instant, it searches for the globally optimal set of spacetime trajectories which provides the best explanation for the current image and for all evidence collected so far, while satisfying the constraints that no two objects may occupy the same physical space, nor explain the same image pixels at any point in time. Successful trajectory hypotheses are fed back to guide object detection in future frames. The optimization procedure is kept efficient through incremental computation and conservative hypothesis pruning. The resulting approach can initialize automatically and track a large and varying number of persons over long periods and through complex scenes with clutter, occlusions, and large-scale background changes. Also, the global optimization framework allows our system to recover from mismatches and temporarily lost tracks. We demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach on several challenging video sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking
Isard, M., & Blake, A. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008078328650 · Cited by 4,886
Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., & Meer, P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1195991 · Cited by 4,560
An algorithm for tracking multiple targets
Reid, D. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102177 · Cited by 3,059
Cited by
Kalal, Z., Mikolajczyk, K., & Matas, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.239 · Cited by 3,285
Multiple Object Tracking Using K-Shortest Paths Optimization
Berclaz, J., Fleuret, F., Turetken, E., & Fua, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.21 · Cited by 1,015
Globally-optimal greedy algorithms for tracking a variable number of objects
Pirsiavash, H., Ramanan, D., & Fowlkes, C. C. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995604 · Cited by 790
A mobile vision system for robust multi-person tracking
Ess, A., Leibe, B., Schindler, K., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587581 · Cited by 721
Self-citationStable multi-target tracking in real-time surveillance video
Benfold, B., & Reid, I. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995667 · Cited by 651
Metadata
- Authors
- Leibe, B., Schindler, K., & Van Gool, L.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2148442626
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coupled Detection and Trajectory Estimation for Multi-Object Tracking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408936
- The paper
- Leibe, B., Schindler, K., & Van Gool, L. (2007). Coupled Detection and Trajectory Estimation for Multi-Object Tracking. 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408936
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.