Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning

Zeiler, Matthew D., Taylor, Graham W., Fergus, Rob·2011·2011 International Conference on Computer Vision

Abstract

We present a hierarchical model that learns image decompositions via alternating layers of convolutional sparse coding and max pooling. When trained on natural images, the layers of our model capture image information in a variety of forms: low-level edges, mid-level edge junctions, high-level object parts and complete objects. To build our model we rely on a novel inference scheme that ensures each layer reconstructs the input, rather than just the output of the layer directly beneath, as is common with existing hierarchical approaches. This makes it possible to learn multiple layers of representation and we show models with 4 layers, trained on images from the Caltech-101 and 256 datasets. When combined with a standard classifier, features extracted from these models outperform SIFT, as well as representations from other feature learning methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126474

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. yang, 2009, Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification, CVPR, 7
  2. 10.1561/0600000018 · DOI · Paper page
  3. wang, 2010, Localityconstrained linear coding for image classification, CVPR, 7
  4. 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206839 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.254 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s11263-006-6995-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.56 · DOI · Paper page
  8. rigamonti, 2010, Is sparsity really relevant for image classification? Technical Report 152499, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), 7
  9. 10.1145/1553374.1553453 · DOI · Paper page
  10. ranzato, 2007, Unsupervised learning of invariant feature hierarchies with applications to object reocgnition, CVPR, 2
  11. zhu, 2009, Learning a hierarchical deformable template for rapid deformable object parsing, PAMI, 2
  12. chen, 2010, Deep learning with hierarichal convolutional factor analysis, JMLR page Submitted, 1, 5
  13. 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539957 · DOI
  14. boureau, 2010, Learning midlevel features for recognition, IEEE CVPR05, 7
  15. 10.1016/j.cviu.2005.09.004 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587409 · DOI
  17. kavukcuoglu, 2010, Learning convolutional feature hierachies for visual recognition, NIPS, 1, 2

Cited by

See all 1,217

Metadata

Authors
Zeiler, M. D., Taylor, G. W., & Fergus, R.
Venue
2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-11
Pages
2018-2025
OpenAlex
W2141200610
Cited by
1,217
References
7
FWCI
20.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.