Cited by 443Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

In defense of soft-assignment coding

Lingqiao Liu, Lei Wang, Xinwang Liu·2011·2011 International Conference on Computer Vision

Abstract

In object recognition, soft-assignment coding enjoys computational efficiency and conceptual simplicity. However, its classification performance is inferior to the newly developed sparse or local coding schemes. It would be highly desirable if its classification performance could become comparable to the state-of-the-art, leading to a coding scheme which perfectly combines computational efficiency and classification performance. To achieve this, we revisit soft-assignment coding from two key aspects: classification performance and probabilistic interpretation. For the first aspect, we argue that the inferiority of soft-assignment coding is due to its neglect of the underlying manifold structure of local features. To remedy this, we propose a simple modification to localize the soft-assignment coding, which surprisingly achieves comparable or even better performance than existing sparse or local coding schemes while maintaining its computational advantage. For the second aspect, based on our probabilistic interpretation of the soft-assignment coding, we give a probabilistic explanation to the magic max-pooling operation, which has successfully been used by sparse or local coding schemes but still poorly understood. This probability explanation motivates us to develop a new mix-order max-pooling operation which further improves the classification performance of the proposed coding scheme. As experimentally demonstrated, the localized soft-assignment coding achieves the state-of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126534

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We propose to do continuous orientation estimation via classification with soft assignment coding.

    “Alternatively, we propose to do continuous orientation estimation via classification with soft assignment coding [39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Wang, L., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-11
Pages
2486-2493
OpenAlex
W2123745357
Cited by
443
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 25
FWCI
37.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
sparse coding, object recognition, max pooling, probabilistic interpretation, computational efficiency, image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review