The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Salient Region Detection with Soft Image Abstraction
Open accessAbstract
Detecting visually salient regions in images is one of the fundamental problems in computer vision. We propose a novel method to decompose an image into large scale perceptually homogeneous elements for efficient salient region detection, using a soft image abstraction representation. By considering both appearance similarity and spatial distribution of image pixels, the proposed representation abstracts out unnecessary image details, allowing the assignment of comparable saliency values across similar regions, and producing perceptually accurate salient region detection. We evaluate our salient region detection approach on the largest publicly available dataset with pixel accurate annotations. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms 18 alternate methods, reducing the mean absolute error by 25.2% compared to the previous best result, while being computationally more efficient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1411 · Cited by 1,766 · cited 1×
“A considerable amount of research in cognitive psychology [48] and neurobiology [18] has been devoted to discovering the mechanisms of visual attention in humans [38].”
Background
Cited by
Structure-Measure: A New Way to Evaluate Foreground Maps
Fan, D.-P., Cheng, M.-M., Liu, Y., Li, T., & Borji, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.487 · Cited by 2,092
Self-citationVisual saliency based on multiscale deep features
Li, G., & Yu, Y. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299184 · Cited by 1,163
BING: Binarized Normed Gradients for Objectness Estimation at 300fps
Cheng, M.-M., Zhang, Z., Lin, W.-Y., & Torr, P. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.414 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationCNN: Single-label to Multi-label
Wei, Y., Xia, W., Huang, J., Ni, B., Dong, J., Zhao, Y., & Yan, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.5726 · Cited by 784
MobileSal: Extremely Efficient RGB-D Salient Object Detection
Wu, Y.-H., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Bian, J.-W., Gu, Y.-C., & Cheng, M.-M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3134684 · Cited by 176
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, M.-M., Warrell, J., Lin, W.-Y., Zheng, S., Vineet, V., & Crook, N.
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-12
- Pages
- 1529-1536
- OpenAlex
- W2156777442
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
