Cited by 1,766Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?

Wolfe, Jeremy M., Horowitz, Todd S.·2004·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1411

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wolfe, Jeremy M.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2004-06
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
495-501
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2030031014
Cited by
1,766
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 128 · 2013: 114 · 2012: 102
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
visual attention, attentional deployment, attentional control, cognitive load, stress, driving
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Brain, Cues, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review