Cited by 9Advanced Neural Network Applications3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Cutting Edge: Soft Correspondences in Multimodal Scene Parsing

Namin, Sarah Taghavi, Najafi, Mohammad, Salzmann, Mathieu, Petersson, Lars·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Exploiting multiple modalities for semantic scene parsing has been shown to improve accuracy over the single modality scenario. Existing methods, however, assume that corresponding regions in two modalities have the same label. In this paper, we address the problem of data misalignment and label inconsistencies, e.g., due to moving objects, in semantic labeling, which violate the assumption of existing techniques. To this end, we formulate multimodal semantic labeling as inference in a CRF, and introduce latent nodes to explicitly model inconsistencies between two domains. These latent nodes allow us not only to leverage information from both domains to improve their labeling, but also to cut the edges between inconsistent regions. To eliminate the need for hand tuning the parameters of our model, we propose to learn intra-domain and inter-domain potential functions from training data. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach on two publicly available datasets containing 2D imagery and 3D point clouds. Thanks to our latent nodes and our learning strategy, our method outperforms the state-of-the-art in both cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2015.141

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many different methods are available, such as soft correspondences and 3D scene analysis from RGB-D data, to ensure dense and accurate scene parsing of indoor and outdoor environments.

    “Many different methods are available, such as soft correspondences [94], 3D scene analysis from RGB-D data [95], to ensure dense and accurate scene parsing of indoor and outdoor environments.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Namin, S. T., Najafi, M., Salzmann, M., & Petersson, L.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Data61 (AU)
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-12
Pages
1188-1196
OpenAlex
W2204747942
Cited by
9
References
29
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
semantic annotation, label inconsistency, conditional random fields, 3D point clouds, moving objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review